From: "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@huawei.com> To: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>, "naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>, "anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>, "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:02:47 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ddb44b9b-cc18-8f49-e82c-b1ae00546962@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <2f32fff3-6b58-583f-8e85-06ec1553d3f4@huawei.com> On 2021/8/2 11:52, liuqi (BA) wrote: [...] >> This might be the direction to go later. Anyway, "Rome wasn't built >> in a day", for this stage, we might focus on optprobe for the case >> of non-randomized module region :-). >> >> BTW, @liuqi, if users set "nokaslr" in bootargs, will your optprobe >> always work and not fall back to normal kprobe even we remove the >> dependency on RANDOMIZED_MODULE_REGION_FULL? >> > Hi Barry, > > I do some tests on Hip08 platform, using nokaslr in booting cmdline and > remove dependency on RANDOMIZED_MODULE_REGION_FULL, optprobe seems work. > Here is the log: > > estuary:/$ uname -a > Linux (none) 5.13.0-rc4+ #37 SMP PREEMPT Mon Aug 2 08:13:37 CST 2021 > aarch64 GNU/Linux > estuary:/$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep RANDOMIZE_MODULE_REGION > CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MODULE_REGION_FULL=y > estuary:/$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep OPTPROBE > CONFIG_OPTPROBES=y > CONFIG_HAVE_OPTPROBES=y > estuary:/$ cat /proc/cmdline > console=ttyAMA0,115200 earlycon=pl011,0x9000000 kpti=off nokaslr > estuary:/$ cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/hello_driver/kprobe_test > [ 61.304143] do_empty returned 0 and took 200 ns to execute > [ 61.304662] do_empty returned 0 and took 110 ns to execute > [ 61.305196] do_empty returned 0 and took 100 ns to execute > [ 61.305745] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.306262] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.306781] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.307286] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.307798] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.308314] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.308828] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.309323] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > [ 61.309832] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > [ 61.310357] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > [ 61.310871] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > [ 61.311361] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > [ 61.311851] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.312358] do_empty returned 0 and took 90 ns to execute > [ 61.312879] do_empty returned 0 and took 80 ns to execute > > Thanks, > Qi > Hi Barry, I've done test on Hip08 platform using nokaslr in booting cmdline and remove dependency on RANDOMIZED_MODULE_REGION_FULL, on following 4 cases: 1. probed code in module, pre_handler in kernel. 2. probed code in kernel, pre_handler in kernel. 3. probed code in module, pre_handler in module. 4. probed code in kernel, pre_handler in module. and optprobe works in these 4 cases. Thanks, Qi >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> -- >>> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> >> >> Thanks >> Barry >> . >> > > .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 12:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-19 12:24 Qi Liu 2021-07-21 8:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2021-07-22 10:24 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) 2021-07-22 15:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2021-07-23 2:43 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) 2021-07-30 10:04 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) 2021-07-31 1:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2021-07-31 12:21 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) 2021-08-02 3:52 ` liuqi (BA) 2021-08-02 3:59 ` liuqi (BA) 2021-08-02 12:02 ` liuqi (BA) [this message] 2021-07-30 3:32 ` liuqi (BA)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ddb44b9b-cc18-8f49-e82c-b1ae00546962@huawei.com \ --to=liuqi115@huawei.com \ --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \ --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \ --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).