linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	Ray.Huang@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	Borislav.Petkov@amd.com
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Xinmei.Huang@amd.com,
	Xiaojian.Du@amd.com, Li.Meng@amd.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: remove set_boost callback for passive mode
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:45:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddc3bc6a-b120-4327-bc04-b1b88318610e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3404e063b86a5517b70d497b066c3fdeb5d8bef3.1706255676.git.perry.yuan@amd.com>

On 1/26/2024 02:08, Perry Yuan wrote:
> From: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
> 
> The following patches will enable `amd-pstate` CPU boost control method
When it's committed it won't be a patch.  How about instead "A specific 
amd-pstate CPU boost control method is to be introduced and the legacy 
callback doesn't make sense" or something along those lines.

Also; is the ordering correct?  In terms of bisectability should this 
come after the new one is introduced perhaps?

> which will not need this common boost control callback anymore, so we
> remove the legacy set_boost interface from amd-pstate driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 26 --------------------------
>   1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 9a1e194d5cf8..8f308f56ade6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -632,31 +632,6 @@ static int amd_get_lowest_nonlinear_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   	return lowest_nonlinear_freq * 1000;
>   }
>   
> -static int amd_pstate_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
> -{
> -	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (!cpudata->boost_supported) {
> -		pr_err("Boost mode is not supported by this processor or SBIOS\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (state)
> -		policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cpudata->max_freq;
> -	else
> -		policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cpudata->nominal_freq;
> -
> -	policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> -
> -	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&cpudata->req[1],
> -				      policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>   static void amd_pstate_boost_init(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   {
>   	u32 highest_perf, nominal_perf;
> @@ -1391,7 +1366,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = {
>   	.exit		= amd_pstate_cpu_exit,
>   	.suspend	= amd_pstate_cpu_suspend,
>   	.resume		= amd_pstate_cpu_resume,
> -	.set_boost	= amd_pstate_set_boost,
>   	.name		= "amd-pstate",
>   	.attr		= amd_pstate_attr,
>   };


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26  8:08 [PATCH 0/7] AMD Pstate Driver Core Performance Boost Perry Yuan
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: remove set_boost callback for passive mode Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 15:45   ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-01-29  4:46     ` Yuan, Perry
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize new core precision boost state Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 16:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-01-27 19:01   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-11 18:19   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-14  6:37   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: implement cpb_boost sysfs entry for boost control Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 15:56   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-01-29  5:22     ` Yuan, Perry
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix max_perf calculation for amd_get_max_freq() Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 15:54   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-01-29  5:16     ` Yuan, Perry
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the MSR highest perf will be reset issue while cpb boost off Perry Yuan
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq:amd-pstate: add suspend and resume callback for passive mode Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 15:52   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-01-26  8:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: introduce the new cpu boost control method Perry Yuan
2024-01-26 15:47   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-01-29  5:07     ` Yuan, Perry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddc3bc6a-b120-4327-bc04-b1b88318610e@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
    --cc=Xinmei.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).