linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:53:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de8f306a-f7f9-f1f4-a8f6-97897b4c78e7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5E61244-386C-4FD8-AAF8-3135F471B92E@arista.com>

Hi James,

On 3/9/19 12:57 AM, James Sewart wrote:
> Hey Lu,
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2019, at 03:09, Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do you mind if I work on top of your patches for further cleanups and
>>>> sign off a v2 together with you?
>>> Sure, sounds good. I’ll fixup patch 3 and have a go at integrating
>>> iommu_prepare_isa into get_resv_regions. This should make the initial
>>> domain logic here quite concise.
>> Here attached three extra patches which I think should be added before
>> PATCH 3/4, and some further cleanup changes which you can merge with
>> PATCH 4/4.
>>
>> ----------------
>>
>> 0006-iommu-Add-ops-entry-for-vendor-specific-default-doma.patch
>> 0007-iommu-vt-d-Add-is_identity_map-ops-entry.patch
>>
>> These two patches aim to add a generic method for vendor specific iommu
>> drivers to specify the type of the default domain for a device. Intel
>> iommu driver will register an ops for this since it already has its own
>> identity map adjudicator for a long time.
> This seems like a good idea, but as domain alloc is only called for the
> default domain on first device attached to a group, we may miss checking
> whether a device added later should have an identity domain. Should there
> be paths to downgrade a groups domain if one of the devices requires one?
> 

Good catch!

This is supposed to be handled in iommu_no_mapping(). But, obviously
current code sticks to lazy domain allocation. I'm not sure whether
there are any real such cases, but we should handle it in a clean way.
My idea is that we could downgrade to multiple domains per group (just
like what we have now) in this case and print a kernel message for this.

Or any other thoughts?

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-09  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-04 15:41 [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46   ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:47     ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-05  6:59       ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:46         ` James Sewart
2019-03-06  7:00           ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-06 18:08             ` James Sewart
2019-03-07  6:31               ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-07 10:21                 ` James Sewart
2019-03-08  1:09                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08  3:09                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08 16:57                     ` James Sewart
2019-03-09  1:53                       ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-03-09 11:49                         ` James Sewart
2019-03-10  2:51                           ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-05  6:46     ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:34       ` James Sewart
2019-03-08  1:20     ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-03-09 11:57       ` James Sewart
2019-03-05  6:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:14   ` James Sewart
2019-03-06  6:27     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA direct mapping region via iommu_get_resv_regions James Sewart
2019-03-15  2:19     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22  9:57       ` James Sewart
2019-03-25  2:03         ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-25 12:57           ` James Sewart
2019-03-26  1:10             ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-26  1:24             ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-28 18:37               ` James Sewart
2019-03-29 15:26                 ` James Sewart
2019-04-04  6:49                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-05 18:02                     ` James Sewart
2019-04-08  2:43                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-10  5:22                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-15 14:16                         ` James Sewart
2019-04-16  2:18                           ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-24 23:47                             ` Tom Murphy
2019-04-25  1:15                               ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Ignore domain parameter in attach_device if device requires identity map James Sewart
2019-03-15  2:30     ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Enable DMA remapping after rmrr mapped James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA to be allocated by iommu_ops James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-14 23:35     ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-22 10:07       ` James Sewart
2019-03-15  3:13   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain Lu Baolu
2019-03-19 13:35     ` James Sewart
2019-03-20  1:26       ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22 10:05         ` James Sewart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de8f306a-f7f9-f1f4-a8f6-97897b4c78e7@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jamessewart@arista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).