From: Andrey Ryabinin <arbn@yandex-team.com>
To: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cputime,cpuacct: Include guest time in user time in cpuacct.stat
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:37:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dee3d594-65bb-ffa2-f009-7900a4cf3f89@yandex-team.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnu5l9e6.fsf@oracle.com>
Sorry for abandoning this, got distracted by lots of other stuff.
On 3/18/21 1:09 AM, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> Andrey Ryabinin <arbn@yandex-team.com> writes:
>
>> cpuacct.stat in no-root cgroups shows user time without guest time
>> included int it. This doesn't match with user time shown in root
>> cpuacct.stat and /proc/<pid>/stat.
>
> Yeah, that's inconsistent.
>
>> Make account_guest_time() to add user time to cgroup's cpustat to
>> fix this.
>
> Yep.
>
> cgroup2's cpu.stat is broken the same way for child cgroups, and this
> happily fixes it. Probably deserves a mention in the changelog.
>
Sure.
> The problem with cgroup2 was, if the workload was mostly guest time,
> cpu.stat's user and system together reflected it, but it was split
> unevenly across the two. I think guest time wasn't actually included in
> either bucket, it was just that the little user and system time there
> was got scaled up in cgroup_base_stat_cputime_show -> cputime_adjust to
> match sum_exec_runtime, which did have it.
>
> The stats look ok now for both cgroup1 and 2. Just slightly unsure
> whether we want to change the way both interfaces expose the accounting
> in case something out there depends on it. Seems like we should, but
> it'd be good to hear more opinions.
>
>> @@ -148,11 +146,11 @@ void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, u64 cputime)
>>
>> /* Add guest time to cpustat. */
>> if (task_nice(p) > 0) {
>> - cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += cputime;
>> - cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE] += cputime;
>> + task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_NICE, cputime);
>> + task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE, cputime);
>> } else {
>> - cpustat[CPUTIME_USER] += cputime;
>> - cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST] += cputime;
>> + task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_USER, cputime);
>> + task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_GUEST, cputime);
>> }
>
> Makes sense for _USER and _NICE, but it doesn't seem cgroup1 or 2
> actually use _GUEST and _GUEST_NICE.
>
> Could go either way. Consistency is nice, but I probably wouldn't
> change the GUEST ones so people aren't confused about why they're
> accounted. It's also extra cycles for nothing, even though most of the
> data is probably in the cache.
>
Agreed, will live the _GUEST* as is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 12:00 [PATCH 1/4] cputime,cpuacct: Include guest time in user time in cpuacct.stat Andrey Ryabinin
2021-02-17 12:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] cgroup: Fix 'usage_usec' time in root's cpu.stat Andrey Ryabinin
2021-03-17 22:13 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-02-17 12:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/cpuacct: fix user/system in shown cpuacct.usage* Andrey Ryabinin
2021-03-17 22:22 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-08-20 9:37 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2021-02-17 12:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/cpuacct: Make user/system times in cpuacct.stat more precise Andrey Ryabinin
2021-03-17 22:25 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-03-17 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] cputime,cpuacct: Include guest time in user time in cpuacct.stat Daniel Jordan
2021-08-20 9:37 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2021-08-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cputime, cpuacct: " Andrey Ryabinin
2021-08-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cpuacct: convert BUG_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() Andrey Ryabinin
2021-08-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cgroup: Fix 'usage_usec' time in root's cpu.stat Andrey Ryabinin
2021-08-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched/cpuacct: fix user/system in shown cpuacct.usage* Andrey Ryabinin
2021-09-10 19:03 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-08-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/cpuacct: Make user/system times in cpuacct.stat more precise Andrey Ryabinin
2021-09-07 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cputime, cpuacct: Include guest time in user time in cpuacct.stat Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dee3d594-65bb-ffa2-f009-7900a4cf3f89@yandex-team.com \
--to=arbn@yandex-team.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).