From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"jolsa@redhat.com" <jolsa@redhat.com>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Replace 'overwrite' by 'flightrecorder' for better naming
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:05:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfc4dad3-75dc-6dcd-b5ee-45f030ddd414@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537DC1C0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 2017/11/1 21:26, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> The meaning of perf record's "overwrite" option and many "overwrite" in
>> source code are not clear. In perf's code, the 'overwrite' has 2 meanings:
>> 1. Make ringbuffer readonly (perf_evlist__mmap_ex's argument).
>> 2. Set evsel's "backward" attribute (in apply_config_terms).
>>
>> perf record doesn't use meaning 1 at all, but have a overwrite option, its
>> real meaning is setting backward.
>>
> I don't understand here.
> 'overwrite' has 2 meanings. perf record only support 1.
> It should be a bug, and need to be fixed.
Not a bug, but ambiguous.
Perf record doesn't need overwrite main channel (we have two channels:
evlist->mmap is main channel and evlist->backward_mmap is backward channel),
but some testcases require it, and your new patchset may require it.
'perf record --overwrite' doesn't set main channel overwrite. What it does
is moving all evsels to backward channel, and we can move some evsels back
to the main channel by /no-overwrite/ setting. This behavior is hard to
understand.
Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-01 5:53 [PATCH 0/2] perf record: Fix --overwrite and clarify concepts Wang Nan
2017-11-01 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf mmap: Fix perf backward recording Wang Nan
2017-11-01 9:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 10:32 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 12:10 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-01 12:56 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-02 15:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-01 13:57 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 16:12 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 16:22 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-02 5:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-02 13:25 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-02 14:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-01 5:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Replace 'overwrite' by 'flightrecorder' for better naming Wang Nan
2017-11-01 10:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 10:17 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 13:26 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 14:05 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2017-11-01 14:22 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 14:44 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 15:04 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 16:00 ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 16:13 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfc4dad3-75dc-6dcd-b5ee-45f030ddd414@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).