linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	kernel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: improve percpu_alloc_percpu event trace
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 17:51:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1c09bbb-2c58-a986-c704-1db538da905a@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202205070420.aAhuqpYk-lkp@intel.com>

On 5/6/22 23:38, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted gfp_t
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned long flags @@     got restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp_flags @@
>    include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse:     expected unsigned long flags
>    include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse:     got restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp_flags
>    mm/percpu.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/trace_events.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, include/trace/events/percpu.h):
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted gfp_t
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted gfp_t
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer
>>> include/trace/events/percpu.h:11:1: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer
>    mm/percpu.c:2012:24: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'pcpu_balance_free' - unexpected unlock

The same messages are generated for any other gfp_t argument in trace events.
As far as I understand it is not a bug per se,
but trace macros lacks __force attribute in 'gfp_t'-> 'unsigned long' casts.
The same thing happens with mode_t and with some other places using __print_flags()
for __bitwise marked types.

I can make sparse happy, here and elsewhere but it requires a lot of __force attributes.
Is anyone interested in such patches, or can we silently ignore these messages?

Need to add __force attribute to all entries in __def_gfpflag_names array
and add few changes into trace description, below is an example.

> vim +11 include/trace/events/percpu.h
> 
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  10  
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19 @11  TRACE_EVENT(percpu_alloc_percpu,
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  12  
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  13  	TP_PROTO(bool reserved, bool is_atomic, size_t size,
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  14  		 size_t align, void *base_addr, int off,
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  15  		 void __percpu *ptr, size_t bytes_alloc, gfp_t gfp_flags),
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  16  
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  17  	TP_ARGS(reserved, is_atomic, size, align, base_addr, off, ptr,
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  18  		bytes_alloc, gfp_flags),
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  19  
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  20  	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  21  		__field(	bool,			reserved	)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  22  		__field(	bool,			is_atomic	)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  23  		__field(	size_t,			size		)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  24  		__field(	size_t,			align		)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  25  		__field(	void *,			base_addr	)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  26  		__field(	int,			off		)
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  27  		__field(	void __percpu *,	ptr		)
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  28  		__field(	size_t,			bytes_alloc	)
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  29  		__field(	gfp_t,			gfp_flags	)
VvS: need to replace gfp_t to unsigned long ...

> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  30  	),
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  31  	TP_fast_assign(
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  32  		__entry->reserved	= reserved;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  33  		__entry->is_atomic	= is_atomic;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  34  		__entry->size		= size;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  35  		__entry->align		= align;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  36  		__entry->base_addr	= base_addr;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  37  		__entry->off		= off;
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  38  		__entry->ptr		= ptr;
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  39  		__entry->bytes_alloc	= bytes_alloc;
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  40  		__entry->gfp_flags	= gfp_flags;
VvS: ... and use here (__force unsigned long)

> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  41  	),
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  42  
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  43  	TP_printk("reserved=%d is_atomic=%d size=%zu align=%zu base_addr=%p off=%d ptr=%p bytes_alloc=%zu gfp_flags=%s",
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  44  		  __entry->reserved, __entry->is_atomic,
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  45  		  __entry->size, __entry->align,
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  46  		  __entry->base_addr, __entry->off, __entry->ptr,
> dee6876db0a7a4 Vasily Averin 2022-05-06  47  		  __entry->bytes_alloc, show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags))
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  48  );
> df95e795a72289 Dennis Zhou   2017-06-19  49  
 Thank you,
	Vasily Averin

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-07 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06  4:46 [PATCH] percpu: improve percpu_alloc_percpu event trace Vasily Averin
2022-05-06  7:52 ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-06 19:29   ` [PATCH v2] " Vasily Averin
2022-05-11  2:33     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-11  5:11       ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-11 17:30         ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-15 22:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-05-06 20:38 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2022-05-07 14:51   ` Vasily Averin [this message]
2022-05-07 19:02     ` [PATCH mm] tracing: incorrect gfp_t conversion Vasily Averin
2022-05-07 19:37       ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-07 22:28         ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-07 22:48           ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-07 23:00             ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-08 20:37               ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-08 20:51             ` Joe Perches
2022-05-11  7:20               ` [PATCH mm v2] " Vasily Averin
2022-05-15 22:09                 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-05-16 20:55                   ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-09 21:06     ` [PATCH] percpu: improve percpu_alloc_percpu event trace Steven Rostedt
2022-05-10  4:22       ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-10 14:16         ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1c09bbb-2c58-a986-c704-1db538da905a@openvz.org \
    --to=vvs@openvz.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kernel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).