From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B6DC433DB for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F272222D for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726636AbhAJPsF (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:48:05 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:21352 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726265AbhAJPsE (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:48:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610293597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nJHPoDKDKNzn4WVZWR4KeYqpHAlbzTvnVzZyjMDlt1c=; b=HDRVXHEuphXrHfm6cZOsQ7dw/eWv10yEu1olpo+59+uVzR/AGWOKGFVfDIACIZz38XYke/ pUeDe5M3LAybE3hQou6uFnwmhJP4pXCdE9YgEx1ecV5p8Ss7Xnz5z+wqkaVQyHmEJhVVdT 5kXkQam/vZ0puSBUY1BciUYQUX+odhQ= Received: from mail-io1-f70.google.com (mail-io1-f70.google.com [209.85.166.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-433-fwfEgbcKM3uDWK7tSk-SaA-1; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:46:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: fwfEgbcKM3uDWK7tSk-SaA-1 Received: by mail-io1-f70.google.com with SMTP id b136so10918884iof.19 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=nJHPoDKDKNzn4WVZWR4KeYqpHAlbzTvnVzZyjMDlt1c=; b=pzv4RXDW60w95bbC2QjcYIiyaH8HBFvU2i2aeqfNh9DMfVpx+g54xR4+ii859Qq+2L TwVOzpFLnazN+DXYFgG7Z6jGH8CWqtcpEnZnr5+KDlnVqSk/oUo8NllyLj6TTqwi8v/n S1sZzh5ar4kUPs0xsAgJ4t4LKveKvO/No6TRK78x9/Mb0RTiKkLIx1N0hgYrh2KXpPJb A6/jnD79PqaTiV1JcXxjcAsxfp9flwqNbWicCUxmByplkJyFToGUKNs1I96N++/Mn3WZ pp9EgOBM+Q8j6n4P3J2IxCybsZuNxljMErINxpuEgZ5EcOtHYtWingK46vvc32sYWuLz 6c/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53161qYJ0hpcgeqcUU4u7WzM6jz8Azn8yVguUmtrfLAeKEOxf0Xq m1rI8OzRCk8OdwaPqOkU5op+Mya37aJezSyQ/3EstTiFwk9tFmyRs8u8ekcMfc52Mdjb1B41OYL wm2/BbhncP667YKpWdaFk0Zzm X-Received: by 2002:a92:bbc1:: with SMTP id x62mr12385743ilk.73.1610293593354; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZ3r6sw5d9VM0GgPbcaCZGcSx2U4R9erKNULHXWVKc2CCssIlcALBlqUui9irGxbStQvwoBw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:bbc1:: with SMTP id x62mr12385736ilk.73.1610293593158; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from trix.remote.csb (075-142-250-213.res.spectrum.com. [75.142.250.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v6sm12043670ilo.61.2021.01.10.07.46.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12 From: Tom Rix To: Moritz Fischer , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, moritzf@google.com, Rikard Falkeborn , Zheng Yongjun , Russ Weight , "Gerlach, Matthew" , Sonal Santan , Xu Yilun , Richard Gong References: <20210107043714.991646-1-mdf@kernel.org> <80b29715-aa0a-b2ac-03af-904fc8f8be98@redhat.com> Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:29 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <80b29715-aa0a-b2ac-03af-904fc8f8be98@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote: > On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of >> changes for FPGA DFL. > Is there something I can do to help ? > > I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time. > > Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly. > > 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state. > > 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution These are respectively https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now. fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock respectively https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com/ There are a couple of patchsets that conflict https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@intel.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com/ Which I will follow up on. And the xilinx patchset https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xilinx.com/ Which is being split/worked on offline. If I have missed any patchset, poke me. Tom > > Tom > >