From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF915C433DB for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F9064F03 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234662AbhBXWTv (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:19:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43506 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233615AbhBXWTq (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:19:46 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36DBBC06174A for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d8so5587606ejc.4 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:19:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=esgHPFAXtJraAFZeVMnbgtLoIpVTIBSPXC2kaE9EIyo=; b=Bk62oPLB6TXDuzwnMS2NVq6cZU2EJ+AgM1xn5jV+9BsuyYK0qKJTJ/1QjllD0IpCIx C0+vR8F8imu7znz7XfUVRtxSj6vyCbzzt8h7YyWqTTT8M88zCKOKkfMeCKTG8Pdj5Ljw 2AgNFO6k0WOlAPxrmeYAKCUVW2ktlwKBGt5JE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=esgHPFAXtJraAFZeVMnbgtLoIpVTIBSPXC2kaE9EIyo=; b=uFPkcVI1zglEvbCalvbM/IR+qqybk6lmDWYOLjLARE8gI/CK47QO3BbT7Z0SahcC/w 4cexjzo+FAVLDkim4NNA3sTNHejOVCqwiAAp5U0IV5Kra+EbCXfidXPxNPoyJxhUuwvh PggKWpEN9XIuiFhqzh676nJ/kx19sgC9V8FYD71iduLnDysN6McBRf/3hWrsA6a5G4JO tDrMeHGnq5FZsp3n8a9KquDk6mwkcF3MsLQTLU7oy5H5mqo8vjK4F+4PvUnHaHkq22mq vW6IQZpjvcJ8STz9Uye3ET/jQNwM2jn+g3IysX+5btBzVH3KS62ZlLfMhRJ/WLip2jPh nv4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329sKli3Sx9ZjlehLUW8wraVfVYvujlFX/daSx89Wa6xf7cgUTl gQ5rSanv+YaYAHuguaZq4MuF4o6JJxaWtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjiD5KAeODBCv+FcuEH0jO8vVbYzDx7TZOo87cBVxKIdxa0Yg5W3ud56iHmkQMwwQ8RBhiPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:32d1:: with SMTP id k17mr33393373ejk.141.1614205144864; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:19:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.149] ([80.208.71.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19sm1987576ejs.122.2021.02.24.14.19.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:19:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] background initramfs unpacking, and CONFIG_MODPROBE_PATH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Luis Chamberlain , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra References: <20210224142909.2092914-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Rasmus Villemoes Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:19:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210224142909.2092914-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/02/2021 15.29, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > These two patches are independent, but better-together. kernel test robot says I'll have to add a 0/2 patch: linux/initrd.h: grow an include guard [because defining a macro a second time with the same contents is ok, so is doing another extern declaration, but a trivial static inline definition can't be repeated sigh]