From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753504AbZDEL34 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:29:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751363AbZDEL3n (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:29:43 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.218.169]:58611 "EHLO mail-bw0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751016AbZDEL3m (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:29:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fzHuwIege/Sm/hyH7H73zAKx3D1plRVgv0hg4x0jwDiGgnatr3RZiq3+7t3D21wPLs Z8hOSG+quyTqS5MKtjCnBSIzsh+MMXiLbqmAReKjbssyFgkVD2wctWIBBqT4Bt1H4SvP MDCGGdOBzubhq99jaSgyCZgRngWlqp28mjOmg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49D7B122.50103@wpkg.org> References: <49D7AD54.4060408@vlnb.net> <49D7B122.50103@wpkg.org> Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:29:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) From: Bart Van Assche To: Tomasz Chmielewski Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, James Bottomley , scst-devel , stgt@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > I made some simple SCST and STGT tests last week, there were some where SCST > won, there were some where STGT won. Hello Tomasz, It would be great if you could publish the details of your setup and the tests you have run, such that we are able to reproduce the tests and analyze the results further. Bart.