From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Łukasz Majczak" <lma@semihalf.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, "Qian Cai" <cai@lca.pw>,
"Sarvela, Tomi P" <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:59:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3648990-eb2a-5607-286b-c2e7f352c455@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1302d8e-5380-18d1-0f55-2dfd61f470e6@suse.cz>
On 2/16/21 1:34 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 2/16/21 12:01 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>
>>> I do understand that. And I am not objecting to the patch. I have to
>>> confess I haven't digested it yet. Any changes to early memory
>>> intialization have turned out to be subtle and corner cases only pop up
>>> later. This is almost impossible to review just by reading the code.
>>> That's why I am asking whether we want to address the specific VM_BUG_ON
>>> first with something much less tricky and actually reviewable. And
>>> that's why I am asking whether dropping the bug_on itself is safe to do
>>> and use as a hot fix which should be easier to backport.
>>
>> I can't say I'm familiar enough with migration and compaction code to say
>> if it's ok to remove that bug_on. It does point to inconsistency in the
>> memmap, but probably it's not important.
>
> On closer look, removing the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() in set_pfnblock_flags_mask() is
> not safe. If we violate the zone_spans_pfn condition, it means we will write
> outside of the pageblock bitmap for the zone, and corrupt something. Actually
Clarification. This is true only for !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM, which is unlikely in
practice to produce the configurations that trigger this issue. So we can remove
the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE()
> similar thing can happen in __get_pfnblock_flags_mask() where there's no
> VM_BUG_ON, but there we can't corrupt memory. But we could theoretically fault
> to do accessing some unmapped range?
>
> So the checks would have to become unconditional !DEBUG_VM and return instead of
> causing a BUG. Or we could go back one level and add some checks to
> fast_isolate_around() to detect a page from zone that doesn't match cc->zone.
> The question is if there is another code that will break if a page_zone()
> suddenly changes e.g. in the middle of the pageblock - __pageblock_pfn_to_page()
> assumes that if first and last page is from the same zone, so are all pages in
> between, and the rest relies on that. But maybe if Andrea's
> fast_isolate_around() issue is fixed, that's enough for stable backport.
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-16 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 11:08 [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2021-02-08 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-08 21:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 9:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:11 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:37 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 17:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15 8:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-16 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 18:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15 9:00 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-15 21:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16 8:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 11:01 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 12:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-02-16 13:11 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 16:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 17:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-17 12:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3648990-eb2a-5607-286b-c2e7f352c455@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lma@semihalf.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).