LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / Atom feed
From: Sibi S <sibis@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org,
	jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, ohad@wizery.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	kyan@codeaurora.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	akdwived@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	tsoni@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] remoteproc: qcom: Always assert and deassert reset signals in SDM845
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 22:27:47 +0530
Message-ID: <e4422d6e-c151-0823-606f-e43a9ae62f80@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518214708.GU14924@minitux>

Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the review. Will make all the required changes in v5.

On 05/19/2018 03:17 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 25 Apr 08:08 PDT 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> 
>> SDM845 brings a new reset signal ALT_RESET which is a part of the MSS
>> subsystem hence requires some of the active clks to be enabled before
>> assert/deassert
>>
>> Reset the modem if the BOOT FSM does timeout
>>
>> Reset assert/deassert sequence vary across SoCs adding reset, adding
>> start/stop helper functions to handle SoC specific reset sequences
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> [..]
>> @@ -349,6 +356,32 @@ static int q6v5_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int q6v5_reset_assert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> +{
>> +	return reset_control_assert(qproc->mss_restart);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int q6v5_reset_deassert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> +{
>> +	return reset_control_deassert(qproc->mss_restart);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int q6v5_alt_reset_assert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> +{
>> +	return reset_control_reset(qproc->mss_restart);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int q6v5_alt_reset_deassert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* Ensure alt reset is written before restart reg */
>> +	writel(1, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_ALT_RESET);
>> +
>> +	reset_control_reset(qproc->mss_restart);
>> +
>> +	writel(0, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_ALT_RESET);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> Rather than having these four functions and scattering jumps to some
> function pointer in the code I think it will be shorter and cleaner to
> just have the q6v5_reset_{asert,deassert}() functions and in there check
> if has_alt_reset and take appropriate action.
> 

yes this seems simpler

>>   static int q6v5_rmb_pbl_wait(struct q6v5 *qproc, int ms)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long timeout;
>> @@ -424,6 +457,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>>   				val, (val & BIT(0)) != 0, 10, BOOT_FSM_TIMEOUT);
>>   		if (ret) {
>>   			dev_err(qproc->dev, "Boot FSM failed to complete.\n");
>> +			/* Reset the modem so that boot FSM is in reset state */
>> +			qproc->reset_deassert(qproc);
> 
> 
> A thing like this typically should go into it's own patch, to keep a
> clear record of why it was changed, but as this is simply amending the
> previous patch it indicates that that one wasn't complete.
> 
> So if you reorder the two patches you can just put this directly into
> the sdm845 patch, making it "complete".
> 
> (This also means that I want to merge the handover vs ready interrupt
> patch before that one, so please include it in the next revision of the
> series).
> 

Will re-order them.


>>   			return ret;
>>   		}
>>   
>> @@ -792,12 +827,20 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>>   		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable supplies\n");
>>   		goto disable_proxy_clk;
>>   	}
>> -	ret = reset_control_deassert(qproc->mss_restart);
>> +
>> +	ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
>> +			      qproc->reset_clk_count);
> 
> Remind me, why can't you always enable the active clock before
> deasserting reset? That way we wouldn't have to split out the iface
> clock handling to be just slightly longer than the active clocks.
> 

Have to introduce reset clks for backward compatibility, both msm8916
and msm8996 require the mss_reset to be deasserted before enabling
the active clks.

>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to deassert mss restart\n");
>> +		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable reset clocks\n");
>>   		goto disable_vdd;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	ret = qproc->reset_deassert(qproc);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to deassert mss restart\n");
>> +		goto disable_reset_clks;
>> +	}
>> +
> [..]
>> @@ -1335,8 +1399,11 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
>>   			"prng",
>>   			NULL
>>   	},
>> -	.active_clk_names = (char*[]){
>> +	.reset_clk_names = (char*[]){
>>   			"iface",
>> +			NULL
>> +	},
>> +	.active_clk_names = (char*[]){
> 
> Again, if you reorder your patches to first add the support for
> alt_reset and then introduce sdm845 you don't need to modify the
> previous patch directly to make it work.
> 

yeah I'll re-order them

>>   			"bus",
>>   			"mem",
>>   			"gpll0_mss",
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc, is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

      reply index

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25 15:08 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add support for remoteproc modem-pil on SDM845 SoCs Sibi Sankar
2018-04-25 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: reset: Add AOSS reset bindings for " Sibi Sankar
2018-04-27 10:24   ` Philipp Zabel
2018-04-27 10:45     ` Sibi S
2018-04-25 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] reset: qcom: AOSS (always on subsystem) reset controller Sibi Sankar
2018-04-27 10:41   ` Philipp Zabel
2018-04-27 11:15     ` Sibi S
2018-04-27 11:54       ` Philipp Zabel
2018-04-25 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Q6v5 Modem PIL binding for SDM845 Sibi Sankar
2018-04-27 14:32   ` Rob Herring
2018-04-25 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for mss remoteproc on SDM845 Sibi Sankar
2018-05-18 21:31   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-21 16:51     ` Sibi S
2018-04-25 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] remoteproc: qcom: Always assert and deassert reset signals in SDM845 Sibi Sankar
2018-05-18 21:47   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-21 16:57     ` Sibi S [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4422d6e-c151-0823-606f-e43a9ae62f80@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sibis@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=akdwived@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kyan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox