Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix arm_smmu_device refcount leak when arm_smmu_rpm_get fails

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
	Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix arm_smmu_device refcount leak when arm_smmu_rpm_get fails
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5b8d7f6-862e-bca4-a1e9-35e0de47440e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1623245709-11123-1-git-send-email-xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>

On 2021-06-09 14:35, Xiyu Yang wrote:
> arm_smmu_rpm_get() invokes pm_runtime_get_sync(), which increases the
> refcount of the "smmu" even though the return value is less than 0.
> 
> The reference counting issue happens in some error handling paths of
> arm_smmu_rpm_get() in its caller functions. When arm_smmu_rpm_get()
> fails, the caller functions forget to decrease the refcount of "smmu"
> increased by arm_smmu_rpm_get(), causing a refcount leak.
> 
> Fix this issue by calling arm_smmu_rpm_put() or jumping to the "rpm_put"
> label when arm_smmu_rpm_get() fails.

If only there was some kind of helper function which could encapsulate 
the correct expected behaviour in a single place...

In fact with the new pm_runtime_resume_and_get() API I think these two 
patches boil down to a one-line change.

Thanks,
Robin.

> Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 13 +++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 6f72c4d208ca..177ee54c5534 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   
>   	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
> @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>   	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
>   
> +rpm_put:
>   	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   }
>   
> @@ -1153,7 +1154,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   
>   	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>   	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu, dev);
> @@ -1404,7 +1405,7 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto out_cfg_free;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
>   	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> @@ -1417,6 +1418,8 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	return &smmu->iommu;
>   
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   out_cfg_free:
>   	kfree(cfg);
>   out_free:
> @@ -1438,8 +1441,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>   
>   	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   		return;
> +	}
>   
>   	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(cfg, fwspec);
>   
> 