linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug 215734 - shared object loaded very low in memory ARM 32bit with kernel 5.17.0 #forregzbot
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 06:42:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5c8cccd-c9dd-ff80-ae88-b47f70f66c6a@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2b90c55-1a4a-4cf1-2dc7-2b2a4dc7d168@leemhuis.info>

TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.

#regzbot fixed-by: aeb7923733d100


On 31.03.22 08:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
> 
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody
> acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided
> to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant
> here. Note, this is the second regression report referencin a commit
> from H.J. Lu as culprit (9630f0d60fec ("fs/binfmt_elf: use PT_LOAD
> p_align values for static PIE")). I forwarded the first one on Monday
> already, but seems nothing happened:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cb5b81bd-9882-e5dc-cd22-54bdbaaefbbc@leemhuis.info/
> 
> Anyway, to get back to the latest report. To quote from
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215734 :
> 
>>  Jan Palus 2022-03-24 10:17:02 UTC
>>
>> This is a followup to https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28990 where ld.so --verify segfault was reported on binaries > 4MB.
>>
>> It appears that starting with kernel 5.17.0 shared object is loaded in the begging of address space at least on 32-bit ARM:
>>
>> /proc/<pid>/maps just before mmap (5.17):
>> 00400000-00429000 r-xp 00000000 b3:02 393320     /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>> 00439000-0043c000 rw-p 00029000 b3:02 393320     /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>> 76ffd000-76ffe000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [sigpage]
>> 76ffe000-76fff000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0          [vvar]
>> 76fff000-77000000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [vdso]
>> 7efdf000-7f000000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0          [stack]
>> ffff0000-ffff1000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [vectors]
>>
>> causing segfaults when mmaping large binaries at fixed address 0x10000 (ie done by ld.so --verify used by ldd).
>>
>> By comparison it is not the case for kernel 5.16.8:
>>
>> /proc/<pid>/maps just before mmap (5.16):
>> 76fc4000-76fed000 r-xp 00000000 b3:02 393320     /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>> 76ffa000-76ffb000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [sigpage]
>> 76ffb000-76ffc000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0          [vvar]
>> 76ffc000-76ffd000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [vdso]
>> 76ffd000-77000000 rw-p 00029000 b3:02 393320     /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>> 7efdf000-7f000000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0          [stack]
>> ffff0000-ffff1000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [vectors]
>>
>> [reply] [−] Comment 1 Jan Palus 2022-03-29 22:14:12 UTC
>>
>> First bad commit appears to be:
>>
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:09:40 -0800
>> Subject: fs/binfmt_elf: use PT_LOAD p_align values for static PIE
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9630f0d60fec5fbcaa4435a66f75df1dc9704b66
>>
> 
> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere
> else already? Or even fixed?
> 
> 
> Anyway, to get this tracked:
> 
> #regzbot introduced: 9630f0d60fec5fbcaa4435a66f75df1dc9704b6
> #regzbot from: Jan Palus <jpalus@fastmail.com>
> #regzbot title: shared object loaded very low in memory ARM 32bit
> causing segfaults on binaries > 4MB
> #regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215734
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> 
> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
> reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack
> knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately
> will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope
> that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me
> in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record
> straight.
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-16  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-31  6:17 Bug 215734 - shared object loaded very low in memory ARM 32bit with kernel 5.17.0 Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-04-09 11:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-04-09 22:17   ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-16  4:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5c8cccd-c9dd-ff80-ae88-b47f70f66c6a@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).