Re: [RFT][PATCH v2 0/2] PM / QoS: Device resume latency framework fix

[Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>]

On 07/11/17 03:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, November 6, 2017 2:46:48 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:00:27 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> This series is a replacement for commit 0cc2b4e5a020 (PM / QoS: Fix device
>>>> resume latency PM QoS) that had to be reverted due to problems introduced by it.
>>>>
>>>> This time the genpd PM QoS governor is first updated to be more consistent
>>>> and the PM QoS changes are made on top of that which simplifies the second
>>>> patch quite a bit.
>>>>
>>>> This is based on the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git as of now (should
>>>> also apply to the current mainline just fine).
>>>>
>>>> Please test if you can or let me know if you have any comments.
>>>
>>> The v2 removes a couple of redundant checks from the first patch (and add
>>> comments to explain why the checks are not needed) and fixes up the
>>> "no constraint" value collision with a valid constraint multiplied by
>>> NSEC_PER_USEC in the second patch.
>>>
>>> Please test if possible and let me know about any issues.
>>
>> With this series, the 3 issues I reported before do not happen.
>>
>> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>
>> Thank you.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Rafael
> 

The latest patches (#1 v3 and #2 v4) seem to work fine in my sanity 
tests also.

Tested-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki