linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com>,
	"paltsev@snyopsys.com" <paltsev@snyopsys.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma access permission code
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 11:57:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e76d2db0-14e9-2c65-947d-a2c1ccc7b832@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR1201MB0120A3C58405DD60FF6B4359A10A0@CY4PR1201MB0120.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On 5/16/19 10:44 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> On 5/16/19 10:24 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>>>> +	unsigned int write = 0, exec = 0, mask;
>>> Probably it's better to use 'bool' type for 'write' and 'exec' as we really use them as a boolean
>> variables.
>>
>> Right those are semantics, but the generated code for "bool" is not ideal - given
>> it is inherently a "char" it is promoted first to an int with an additional EXTB
>> which I really dislike.
>> Guess it is more of a style thing.
> 
> In that sense maybe think about re-definition of "bool" type to 32-bit one
> for entire architecture and get that benefit across the entire source tree?

what bool maps to is driven by the ABI and while not explicit in the ARCv2 ABI
doc, I guess it is byte and hence can't be changed just like that.

-Vineet

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-16 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-15  0:29 [PATCH 0/9] ARC do_page_fault rework Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARC: mm: SIGSEGV userspace trying to access kernel virtual memory Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #1: remove label @good_area Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #2: remove short lived variable Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma access permission code Vineet Gupta
2019-05-16 17:24   ` Eugeniy Paltsev
2019-05-16 17:37     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-16 17:44       ` Alexey Brodkin
2019-05-16 18:57         ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2019-05-17 22:23       ` Eugeniy Paltsev
2019-05-30 17:58         ` extraneous generated EXTB (was Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #3: tidyup vma access permission code) Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #4: consolidate retry related logic Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #5: scoot no_context to end Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #6: error handlers to use same pattern Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #7: fold the various error handling Vineet Gupta
2019-05-15  0:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARC: mm: do_page_fault refactor #8: release mmap_sem sooner Vineet Gupta
2019-05-30 16:48   ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e76d2db0-14e9-2c65-947d-a2c1ccc7b832@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=paltsev@snyopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).