From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bp@alien8.de, mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
james.morse@arm.com, rric@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
keescook@chromium.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/11] drivers/edac: convert pci counters to counter_atomic
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 19:43:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e790d894bf9a1e610ac3f88c7e8474ecd23809c7.1600816121.git.skhan@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1600816121.git.skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
counter_atomic is introduced to be used when a variable is used as
a simple counter and doesn't guard object lifetimes. This clearly
differentiates atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes.
counter_atomic variables will wrap around to 0 when it overflows and
should not be used to guard resource lifetimes, device usage and
open counts that control state changes, and pm states.
atomic_t variables used for pci counters keep track of pci parity and
non-parity errors. Overflow will wrap around and reset the counts as
was the case prior to the conversion.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/edac/edac_pci.h | 5 +++--
drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.h b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.h
index 5175f5724cfa..2f8a21e56377 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.h
@@ -30,12 +30,13 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/counters.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
struct edac_pci_counter {
- atomic_t pe_count;
- atomic_t npe_count;
+ struct counter_atomic pe_count;
+ struct counter_atomic npe_count;
};
/*
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c
index 53042af7262e..fccec2677907 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ static int edac_pci_log_pe = 1; /* log PCI parity errors */
static int edac_pci_log_npe = 1; /* log PCI non-parity error errors */
static int edac_pci_poll_msec = 1000; /* one second workq period */
-static atomic_t pci_parity_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static atomic_t pci_nonparity_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static struct counter_atomic pci_parity_count = COUNTER_ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static struct counter_atomic pci_nonparity_count = COUNTER_ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static struct kobject *edac_pci_top_main_kobj;
static atomic_t edac_pci_sysfs_refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
@@ -58,13 +58,13 @@ int edac_pci_get_poll_msec(void)
/**************************** EDAC PCI sysfs instance *******************/
static ssize_t instance_pe_count_show(struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci, char *data)
{
- return sprintf(data, "%u\n", atomic_read(&pci->counters.pe_count));
+ return sprintf(data, "%u\n", counter_atomic_read(&pci->counters.pe_count));
}
static ssize_t instance_npe_count_show(struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci,
char *data)
{
- return sprintf(data, "%u\n", atomic_read(&pci->counters.npe_count));
+ return sprintf(data, "%u\n", counter_atomic_read(&pci->counters.npe_count));
}
#define to_instance(k) container_of(k, struct edac_pci_ctl_info, kobj)
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_PCI,
"Signaled System Error on %s\n",
pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_nonparity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_nonparity_count);
}
if (status & (PCI_STATUS_PARITY)) {
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
"Master Data Parity Error on %s\n",
pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
}
if (status & (PCI_STATUS_DETECTED_PARITY)) {
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
"Detected Parity Error on %s\n",
pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
}
}
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_PCI, "Bridge "
"Signaled System Error on %s\n",
pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_nonparity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_nonparity_count);
}
if (status & (PCI_STATUS_PARITY)) {
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
"Master Data Parity Error on "
"%s\n", pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
}
if (status & (PCI_STATUS_DETECTED_PARITY)) {
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void edac_pci_dev_parity_test(struct pci_dev *dev)
"Detected Parity Error on %s\n",
pci_name(dev));
- atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci_parity_count);
}
}
}
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ void edac_pci_do_parity_check(void)
if (!check_pci_errors)
return;
- before_count = atomic_read(&pci_parity_count);
+ before_count = counter_atomic_read(&pci_parity_count);
/* scan all PCI devices looking for a Parity Error on devices and
* bridges.
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ void edac_pci_do_parity_check(void)
/* Only if operator has selected panic on PCI Error */
if (edac_pci_get_panic_on_pe()) {
/* If the count is different 'after' from 'before' */
- if (before_count != atomic_read(&pci_parity_count))
+ if (before_count != counter_atomic_read(&pci_parity_count))
panic("EDAC: PCI Parity Error");
}
}
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ void edac_pci_handle_pe(struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci, const char *msg)
{
/* global PE counter incremented by edac_pci_do_parity_check() */
- atomic_inc(&pci->counters.pe_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci->counters.pe_count);
if (edac_pci_get_log_pe())
edac_pci_printk(pci, KERN_WARNING,
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ void edac_pci_handle_npe(struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci, const char *msg)
{
/* global NPE counter incremented by edac_pci_do_parity_check() */
- atomic_inc(&pci->counters.npe_count);
+ counter_atomic_inc(&pci->counters.npe_count);
if (edac_pci_get_log_npe())
edac_pci_printk(pci, KERN_WARNING,
--
2.25.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 1:43 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic and non-atomic counters Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] counters: Introduce counter and counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 10:35 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 19:34 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 20:54 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 20:48 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 20:58 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 21:19 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 22:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] selftests:lib: add new test for counters Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] drivers/base: convert deferred_trigger_count and probe_count to counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 10:30 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] drivers/base/devcoredump: convert devcd_count " Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 10:31 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] drivers/acpi: convert seqno counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-24 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-24 15:08 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-24 15:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] drivers/acpi/apei: " Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] drivers/android/binder: convert stats, transaction_log to counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 5:10 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 19:31 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 20:51 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe: convert to use counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 10:33 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] drivers/char/ipmi: convert stats " Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 1:43 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] drivers/misc/vmw_vmci: convert num guest devices counter to counter_atomic Shuah Khan
2020-09-23 10:29 ` Greg KH
2020-09-23 1:43 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e790d894bf9a1e610ac3f88c7e8474ecd23809c7.1600816121.git.skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).