linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wqu@suse.com, fdmanana@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH stable-5.4 4/6] btrfs: Ensure we trim ranges across block group boundary
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2020 18:59:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7c79e3e83c4914866f953f55458a13dc449459e.1599750901.git.anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1599750901.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

commit 6b7faadd985c990324b5b5bd18cc4ba5c395eb65 upstream.

[BUG]
When deleting large files (which cross block group boundary) with
discard mount option, we find some btrfs_discard_extent() calls only
trimmed part of its space, not the whole range:

  btrfs_discard_extent: type=0x1 start=19626196992 len=2144530432 trimmed=1073741824 ratio=50%

type:		bbio->map_type, in above case, it's SINGLE DATA.
start:		Logical address of this trim
len:		Logical length of this trim
trimmed:	Physically trimmed bytes
ratio:		trimmed / len

Thus leaving some unused space not discarded.

[CAUSE]
When discard mount option is specified, after a transaction is fully
committed (super block written to disk), we begin to cleanup pinned
extents in the following call chain:

btrfs_commit_transaction()
|- btrfs_finish_extent_commit()
   |- find_first_extent_bit(unpin, 0, &start, &end, EXTENT_DIRTY);
   |- btrfs_discard_extent()

However, pinned extents are recorded in an extent_io_tree, which can
merge adjacent extent states.

When a large file gets deleted and it has adjacent file extents across
block group boundary, we will get a large merged range like this:

      |<---    BG1    --->|<---      BG2     --->|
      |//////|<--   Range to discard   --->|/////|

To discard that range, we have the following calls:

  btrfs_discard_extent()
  |- btrfs_map_block()
  |  Returned bbio will end at BG1's end. As btrfs_map_block()
  |  never returns result across block group boundary.
  |- btrfs_issuse_discard()
     Issue discard for each stripe.

So we will only discard the range in BG1, not the remaining part in BG2.

Furthermore, this bug is not that reliably observed, for above case, if
there is no other extent in BG2, BG2 will be empty and btrfs will trim
all space of BG2, covering up the bug.

[FIX]
- Allow __btrfs_map_block_for_discard() to modify @length parameter
  btrfs_map_block() uses its @length paramter to notify the caller how
  many bytes are mapped in current call.
  With __btrfs_map_block_for_discard() also modifing the @length,
  btrfs_discard_extent() now understands when to do extra trim.

- Call btrfs_map_block() in a loop until we hit the range end Since we
  now know how many bytes are mapped each time, we can iterate through
  each block group boundary and issue correct trim for each range.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c     |  6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index ef05cbacef73..a546212594e8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -1306,8 +1306,10 @@ static int btrfs_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, u64 start, u64 len,
 int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr,
 			 u64 num_bytes, u64 *actual_bytes)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 	u64 discarded_bytes = 0;
+	u64 end = bytenr + num_bytes;
+	u64 cur = bytenr;
 	struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;
 
 
@@ -1316,15 +1318,23 @@ int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr,
 	 * associated to its stripes that don't go away while we are discarding.
 	 */
 	btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
-	/* Tell the block device(s) that the sectors can be discarded */
-	ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_DISCARD, bytenr, &num_bytes,
-			      &bbio, 0);
-	/* Error condition is -ENOMEM */
-	if (!ret) {
-		struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe = bbio->stripes;
+	while (cur < end) {
+		struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe;
 		int i;
 
+		num_bytes = end - cur;
+		/* Tell the block device(s) that the sectors can be discarded */
+		ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_DISCARD, cur,
+				      &num_bytes, &bbio, 0);
+		/*
+		 * Error can be -ENOMEM, -ENOENT (no such chunk mapping) or
+		 * -EOPNOTSUPP. For any such error, @num_bytes is not updated,
+		 * thus we can't continue anyway.
+		 */
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto out;
 
+		stripe = bbio->stripes;
 		for (i = 0; i < bbio->num_stripes; i++, stripe++) {
 			u64 bytes;
 			struct request_queue *req_q;
@@ -1341,10 +1351,19 @@ int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr,
 						  stripe->physical,
 						  stripe->length,
 						  &bytes);
-			if (!ret)
+			if (!ret) {
 				discarded_bytes += bytes;
-			else if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
-				break; /* Logic errors or -ENOMEM, or -EIO but I don't know how that could happen JDM */
+			} else if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+				/*
+				 * Logic errors or -ENOMEM, or -EIO, but
+				 * unlikely to happen.
+				 *
+				 * And since there are two loops, explicitly
+				 * go to out to avoid confusion.
+				 */
+				btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
+				goto out;
+			}
 
 			/*
 			 * Just in case we get back EOPNOTSUPP for some reason,
@@ -1354,7 +1373,9 @@ int btrfs_discard_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr,
 			ret = 0;
 		}
 		btrfs_put_bbio(bbio);
+		cur += num_bytes;
 	}
+out:
 	btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
 
 	if (actual_bytes)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 1dba45d43485..ad540283d455 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -5674,12 +5674,13 @@ void btrfs_put_bbio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
  * replace.
  */
 static int __btrfs_map_block_for_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
-					 u64 logical, u64 length,
+					 u64 logical, u64 *length_ret,
 					 struct btrfs_bio **bbio_ret)
 {
 	struct extent_map *em;
 	struct map_lookup *map;
 	struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+	u64 length = *length_ret;
 	u64 offset;
 	u64 stripe_nr;
 	u64 stripe_nr_end;
@@ -5713,6 +5714,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block_for_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 
 	offset = logical - em->start;
 	length = min_t(u64, em->start + em->len - logical, length);
+	*length_ret = length;
 
 	stripe_len = map->stripe_len;
 	/*
@@ -6127,7 +6129,7 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 
 	if (op == BTRFS_MAP_DISCARD)
 		return __btrfs_map_block_for_discard(fs_info, logical,
-						     *length, bbio_ret);
+						     length, bbio_ret);
 
 	ret = btrfs_get_io_geometry(fs_info, op, logical, *length, &geom);
 	if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-08 10:59 [PATCH stable-5.4 0/6] backport fixes for xfstests btrfs/199,200,203,204 Anand Jain
2020-10-08 10:59 ` [PATCH stable-5.4 1/6] Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file Anand Jain
2020-10-08 10:59 ` [PATCH stable-5.4 2/6] Btrfs: send, fix emission of invalid " Anand Jain
2020-10-08 10:59 ` [PATCH stable-5.4 3/6] btrfs: volumes: Use more straightforward way to calculate map length Anand Jain
2020-10-08 10:59 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2020-10-08 10:59 ` [PATCH stable-5.4 5/6] btrfs: fix RWF_NOWAIT write not failling when we need to cow Anand Jain
2020-10-08 10:59 ` [PATCH stable-5.4 6/6] btrfs: allow btrfs_truncate_block() to fallback to nocow for data space reservation Anand Jain
2020-10-09 14:06   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7c79e3e83c4914866f953f55458a13dc449459e.1599750901.git.anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).