linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/19] x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:21:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7ff0d73b8621ebb17bd04d7f328b9dd3d1899f5.1469136008.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1469136008.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

Convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder.  dump_trace() has been
deprecated.

show_trace_log_lvl() is special compared to other users of the unwinder.
It's the only place where both reliable *and* unreliable addresses are
needed.  With frame pointers enabled, most stack walking code doesn't
want to know about unreliable addresses.  But in this case, when we're
dumping the stack to the console because something presumably went
wrong, the unreliable addresses are useful:

- They show stale data on the stack which can provide useful clues.

- If something goes wrong with the unwinder, or if frame pointers are
  corrupt or missing, all the stack addresses still get shown.

So in order to show all addresses on the stack, and at the same time
figure out which addresses are reliable, we have to do the scanning and
the unwinding in parallel.

The scanning is done with the help of get_stack_info() to traverse the
stacks.  The unwinding is done separately by the new unwinder.

In theory we could simplify show_trace_log_lvl() by instead pushing some
of this logic into the unwind code.  But then we would need some kind of
"fake" frame logic in the unwinder which would add a lot of complexity
and wouldn't be worth it in order to support only one user.

Another benefit of this approach is that once we have a DWARF unwinder,
we should be able to just plug it in with minimal impact to this code.

Another change here is that callers of show_trace_log_lvl() don't need
to provide the 'bp' argument.  The unwinder already finds the relevant
frame pointer by unwinding until it reaches the first frame after the
provided stack pointer.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  10 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c       | 180 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c    |   6 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c    |  10 +--
 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 647ce3f..c66dece 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -132,13 +132,11 @@ get_stack_pointer(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
 }
 
-extern void
-show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		   unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl);
+void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl);
 
-extern void
-show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		   unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl);
+void show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl);
 
 extern unsigned int code_bytes;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 6ef8ab5..198dc9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
-
+#include <asm/unwind.h>
 
 int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
 int panic_on_io_nmi;
@@ -79,107 +79,105 @@ ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx, unsigned long addr)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
 
-/*
- * x86-64 can have up to three kernel stacks:
- * process stack
- * interrupt stack
- * severe exception (double fault, nmi, stack fault, debug, mce) hardware stack
- */
-
-unsigned long
-print_context_stack(struct task_struct *task,
-		unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
-		const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data,
-		struct stack_info *info, int *graph)
+void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl)
 {
-	struct stack_frame *frame = (struct stack_frame *)bp;
+	struct unwind_state state;
+	struct stack_info stack_info = {0};
+	unsigned long stack_mask = 0;
+	int graph_idx = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * If we overflowed the stack into a guard page, jump back to the
-	 * bottom of the usable stack.
-	 */
-	if ((unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) - (unsigned long)stack <
-	    PAGE_SIZE)
-		stack = (unsigned long *)task_stack_page(task);
-
-	while (on_stack(info, stack, sizeof(*stack))) {
-		unsigned long addr = *stack;
-
-		addr = *stack;
-		if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) {
-			int reliable = 0;
-			unsigned long real_addr;
+	printk("%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
 
-			if ((unsigned long) stack == bp + sizeof(long)) {
-				reliable = 1;
-				frame = frame->next_frame;
-				bp = (unsigned long) frame;
-			}
+	stack = stack ? : get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
+	if (!task)
+		task = current;
 
-			real_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(task, graph, addr);
-			if (addr != real_addr)
-				ops->address(data, addr, 0);
-			ops->address(data, real_addr, reliable);
-		}
-		stack++;
-	}
-	return bp;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_context_stack);
+	unwind_start(&state, task, regs, stack);
 
-unsigned long
-print_context_stack_bp(struct task_struct *task,
-		       unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
-		       const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data,
-		       struct stack_info *info, int *graph)
-{
-	struct stack_frame *frame = (struct stack_frame *)bp;
-	unsigned long *ret_addr = &frame->return_address;
-
-	while (on_stack(info, stack, sizeof(*stack) * 2)) {
-		unsigned long addr = *ret_addr;
+	/*
+	 * Iterate through the stacks, starting with the current stack pointer.
+	 * Each stack has a pointer to the next one.
+	 *
+	 * x86-64 can have several stacks:
+	 * - task stack
+	 * - interrupt stack
+	 * - HW exception stacks (double fault, nmi, debug, mce)
+	 *
+	 * x86-32 can have up to three stacks:
+	 * - task stack
+	 * - softirq stack
+	 * - hardirq stack
+	 */
+	for (; stack; stack = stack_info.next) {
+		const char *str_begin, *str_end;
 
-		if (!__kernel_text_address(addr))
-			break;
+		/*
+		 * If we overflowed the task stack into a guard page, jump back
+		 * to the bottom of the usable stack.
+		 */
+		if (task_stack_page(task) - (void *)stack < PAGE_SIZE)
+			stack = task_stack_page(task);
 
-		addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(task, graph, addr);
-		if (ops->address(data, addr, 1))
+		if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &stack_mask))
 			break;
-		frame = frame->next_frame;
-		ret_addr = &frame->return_address;
-	}
 
-	return (unsigned long)frame;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_context_stack_bp);
+		stack_type_str(stack_info.type, &str_begin, &str_end);
+		if (str_begin)
+			printk("%s <%s> ", log_lvl, str_begin);
+
+		/*
+		 * Scan the stack, printing any text addresses we find.  At the
+		 * same time, follow proper stack frames with the unwinder.
+		 *
+		 * Addresses found during the scan which are not reported by
+		 * the unwinder are considered to be additional clues which are
+		 * sometimes useful for debugging and are prefixed with '?'.
+		 * This also serves as a failsafe option in case the unwinder
+		 * goes off the rails.
+		 */
+		for (; stack < stack_info.end; stack++) {
+			unsigned long addr = *stack;
+			unsigned long real_addr;
+			unsigned long *ret_addr_p = \
+				unwind_get_return_address_ptr(&state);
 
-static int print_trace_stack(void *data, const char *name)
-{
-	printk("%s <%s> ", (char *)data, name);
-	return 0;
-}
+			if (!__kernel_text_address(addr))
+				continue;
 
-/*
- * Print one address/symbol entries per line.
- */
-static int print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
-{
-	printk_stack_address(addr, reliable, data);
-	return 0;
-}
+			if (stack != ret_addr_p) {
+				/* found an "unreliable" address */
+				printk_stack_address(addr, 0, log_lvl);
+				continue;
+			}
 
-static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
-	.stack			= print_trace_stack,
-	.address		= print_trace_address,
-	.walk_stack		= print_context_stack,
-};
+			/*
+			 * When function graph tracing is enabled, the original
+			 * return address on the stack of a traced function is
+			 * replaced with the address of an ftrace handler.
+			 * In that case we print the ftrace handler address as
+			 * an unreliable clue and then print the real function
+			 * as a reliable address.
+			 */
+			real_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(task, &graph_idx,
+							  addr);
+			if (real_addr != addr)
+				printk_stack_address(addr, 0, log_lvl);
+
+			printk_stack_address(real_addr, 1, log_lvl);
+
+			/*
+			 * Get the next frame from the unwinder.  No need to
+			 * check for an error: if anything goes wrong with the
+			 * unwinder, the rest of the addresses will just be
+			 * printed as unreliable.
+			 */
+			unwind_next_frame(&state);
+		}
 
-void
-show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
-{
-	printk("%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
-	dump_trace(task, regs, stack, bp, &print_trace_ops, log_lvl);
+		if (str_end)
+			printk("%s <%s> ", log_lvl, str_end);
+	}
 }
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
@@ -195,12 +193,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
 		bp = (unsigned long)get_frame_pointer(current, NULL);
 	}
 
-	show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, bp, "");
+	show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, "");
 }
 
 void show_stack_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	show_stack_log_lvl(current, regs, NULL, 0, "");
+	show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, "");
 }
 
 static arch_spinlock_t die_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index 8f55ddb..6a881cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
 
 void
 show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		   unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
+		   unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl)
 {
 	unsigned long *stack;
 	int i;
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		touch_nmi_watchdog();
 	}
 	pr_cont("\n");
-	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
+	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, log_lvl);
 }
 
 
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		u8 *ip;
 
 		pr_emerg("Stack:\n");
-		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, 0, KERN_EMERG);
+		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, KERN_EMERG);
 
 		pr_emerg("Code:");
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index e1a5b6f..6e5ccec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
 
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
+#include <asm/unwind.h>
 
 static char *exception_stack_names[N_EXCEPTION_STACKS] = {
 		[ DOUBLEFAULT_STACK-1	]	= "#DF",
@@ -190,9 +191,8 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
 
-void
-show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		   unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
+void show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl)
 {
 	unsigned long *irq_stack, *irq_stack_end;
 	unsigned long *stack;
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	}
 
 	pr_cont("\n");
-	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
+	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, log_lvl);
 }
 
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		u8 *ip;
 
 		printk(KERN_DEFAULT "Stack:\n");
-		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, 0, KERN_DEFAULT);
+		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
 
 		printk(KERN_DEFAULT "Code: ");
 
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-21 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-21 21:21 [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86/dumpstack: remove show_trace() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_pointer() and get_frame_pointer() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:53   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86/dumpstack: remove unnecessary stack pointer arguments Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:56   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22  1:41     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22  2:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22  3:08       ` Brian Gerst
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86/dumpstack: make printk_stack_address() more generally useful Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-29 22:55   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-30  0:50     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-30  2:20       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-30 13:51         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-01 14:28           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-01 15:36             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-02 21:00               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-02 21:16                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-02 22:13                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-02 23:16                     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03  1:56                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-03  2:30                         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03  2:50                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-03  2:59                             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03  3:12                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-03  3:18                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03  3:21                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03  3:31                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-03  3:45                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-03 14:13                                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-03  3:30                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-01 15:59     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-01 16:05       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-01 16:19         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-01 16:24     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-08-01 16:56       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 06/19] x86/dumpstack: remove extra brackets around "EOE" Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 07/19] x86/dumpstack: add IRQ_USABLE_STACK_SIZE define Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 22:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22  1:48     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22  8:24       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 08/19] x86/dumpstack: don't disable preemption in show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 09/19] x86/dumpstack: simplify in_exception_stack() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 22:05   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 10/19] x86/dumpstack: add get_stack_info() interface Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 23:26   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22 23:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-23 13:09       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 23:54     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-23  0:15       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-23 14:04         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-26  0:09           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 16:26             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-26 17:51               ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-26 18:56                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-26 20:59               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 22:24                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-26 22:31                   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-26 22:37                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 16:47             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-26 17:49               ` Brian Gerst
2016-07-26 18:59                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 11/19] x86/dumptrace: add new unwind interface and implementations Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 12/19] perf/x86: convert perf_callchain_kernel() to the new unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 13/19] x86/stacktrace: convert save_stack_trace_*() " Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 14/19] oprofile/x86: convert x86_backtrace() " Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-07-21 21:49   ` [PATCH 15/19] x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() " Byungchul Park
2016-07-22  1:38     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 16/19] x86/dumpstack: remove dump_trace() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 17/19] x86/entry/dumpstack: encode pt_regs pointer in frame pointer Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 22:27   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 18/19] x86/dumpstack: print stack identifier on its own line Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 21:21 ` [PATCH 19/19] x86/dumpstack: print any pt_regs found on the stack Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-21 22:32   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22  3:30     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22  5:13       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22 15:57         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 21:46           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22 22:20             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 23:18               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-22 23:30                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 23:39                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-23  0:00                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-23  0:22 ` [PATCH 00/19] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code Linus Torvalds
2016-07-23  0:31   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-23  5:35     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-23  5:39       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-07-23 12:53         ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7ff0d73b8621ebb17bd04d7f328b9dd3d1899f5.1469136008.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).