From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D2DC433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327820691 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388440AbgFISIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:08:46 -0400 Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com ([67.231.154.164]:50580 "EHLO dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731294AbgFISIg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:08:36 -0400 Received: from mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (unknown [10.110.50.137]) by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTP id F2C0B20093; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us4-mdac16-21.at1.mdlocal (unknown [10.110.49.203]) by mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTP id F03EA6009B; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (unknown [10.110.49.106]) by mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 88AD022007A; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 27A57B4007C; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.17.20.203] (10.17.20.203) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:08:25 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Documentation: dynamic-debug: Add description of level bitmask To: Joe Perches , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Stanimir Varbanov CC: , , , , , , , Jason Baron , Jonathan Corbet , Jim Cromie References: <20200609104604.1594-1-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> <20200609104604.1594-2-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> <20200609111615.GD780233@kroah.com> <727b31a0-543b-3dc5-aa91-0d78dc77df9c@solarflare.com> <2b291c34e10b3b3d9d6e01f8201ec0942e39575f.camel@perches.com> From: Edward Cree Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:08:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2b291c34e10b3b3d9d6e01f8201ec0942e39575f.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [10.17.20.203] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1020-25470.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No-10.210900-8.000000-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 7ySqCuYCpfjsYbGmK/WYxvZvT2zYoYOwC/ExpXrHizyMUViaYYbK3JYv /wbpWcIKq5ewd0UPS9hdKS1gReph0aH2g9syPs88A9lly13c/gEg/CIfleX9D0hcmj54ab4UNP+ 2kwiBPOV5DzCqPSy3yOKHzP0BuUCDNyl1nd9CIt2DGx/OQ1GV8hFMgtPIAD6i+gtHj7OwNO2Ohz Oa6g8KrdL6UoKG2HjArEiGVSydaXgrmmLgt5BrqsqcASyOtFdbnkXNoeOrXbw= X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.210900-8.000000 X-TMASE-Version: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1020-25470.003 X-MDID: 1591726113-WCvvrqNr18jp Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/06/2020 18:56, Joe Perches wrote: > These are _not_ netif_ control flags. Some are though. > For instance: > > $ git grep "MODULE_PARM.*\bdebug\b" drivers/net | head -10 > [...] > > These are all level/class output controls. TIL, thanks!  I should have looked deeperrather than assuming  they were all like ours. Though judging just by that grep output, it also looks like  quite a lot of those won't fit into 5 groups either, so some  rethink may still be needed... -ed