* [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request
@ 2020-09-15 7:34 Sibi Sankar
2020-09-15 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2020-09-15 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjorn.andersson, mathieu.poirier
Cc: agross, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, ohad,
rishabhb, Sibi Sankar
Currently the coredump debugfs entry takes in "disable" to set the
coredump state to "disabled". Let's just accept the expected state
instead.
Fixes: 3afdc59e43904 ("remoteproc: Add coredump debugfs entry")
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
index 2e3b3e22e1d01..7ca823f6aa638 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t rproc_coredump_write(struct file *filp,
goto out;
}
- if (!strncmp(buf, "disable", count)) {
+ if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", count)) {
rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
} else if (!strncmp(buf, "inline", count)) {
rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request
2020-09-15 7:34 [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request Sibi Sankar
@ 2020-09-15 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-09-15 15:32 ` Sibi Sankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-09-15 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sibi Sankar
Cc: mathieu.poirier, agross, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc,
linux-kernel, ohad, rishabhb
On Tue 15 Sep 07:34 UTC 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Currently the coredump debugfs entry takes in "disable" to set the
> coredump state to "disabled". Let's just accept the expected state
> instead.
>
I like this patch, but rather than arguing that it should match the name
of the internal state I think you should either argue that when read you
get "disabled" back or that "disabled" would make it consistent with the
recovery.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Fixes: 3afdc59e43904 ("remoteproc: Add coredump debugfs entry")
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> index 2e3b3e22e1d01..7ca823f6aa638 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t rproc_coredump_write(struct file *filp,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!strncmp(buf, "disable", count)) {
> + if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", count)) {
> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
> } else if (!strncmp(buf, "inline", count)) {
> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request
2020-09-15 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2020-09-15 15:32 ` Sibi Sankar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2020-09-15 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: mathieu.poirier, agross, linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc,
linux-kernel, ohad, rishabhb
Hey Bjorn,
Thanks for taking time to review the
patch.
On 2020-09-15 20:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 15 Sep 07:34 UTC 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>
>> Currently the coredump debugfs entry takes in "disable" to set the
>> coredump state to "disabled". Let's just accept the expected state
>> instead.
>>
>
> I like this patch, but rather than arguing that it should match the
> name
> of the internal state I think you should either argue that when read
> you
> get "disabled" back or that "disabled" would make it consistent with
> the
> recovery.
Sure, I'll re-word the commit message.
I probably choose the read back argument
because that's what was odd about it in
the first place.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> Fixes: 3afdc59e43904 ("remoteproc: Add coredump debugfs entry")
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> index 2e3b3e22e1d01..7ca823f6aa638 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t rproc_coredump_write(struct file
>> *filp,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!strncmp(buf, "disable", count)) {
>> + if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", count)) {
>> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
>> } else if (!strncmp(buf, "inline", count)) {
>> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-15 22:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-15 7:34 [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request Sibi Sankar
2020-09-15 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-09-15 15:32 ` Sibi Sankar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).