LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
	Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-microchip-pit64b: add Microchip PIT64B support
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:22:50 +0200
Message-ID: <e9e10fa5-dba6-e9ca-f319-036a71105b6a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408124213.GL7480@piout.net>

On 08/04/2019 14:42, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 08/04/2019 14:35:05+0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> What about commit 51f0aeb2d21f1 ?
>>
> 
> Well, do you see anything parsing that in drivers/clocksource ?

So to make it clear:

1. You say I said anything, emphasis this word in the previous answer.
But you are the one who should have argue and give the reasons of the
changes (and I'm sure they are valid). At the moment of the discussion
in the thread you mentioned, the DT change was already present.
 - Why did you not clarified this point in the thread discussion?
 - Why there is no Rob's acked-by in this commit?


2. You keep sending the atmel rework series again and again. And I'm
reviewing it again and again. And you object every single comment I do
on your code. I've already told you that.


3. I'm putting on the table again this clockevent/clocksource selection
from the DT hoping we can finally find a solution for *everyone* and
instead of jumping on the opportunity to discuss it, you blame me to not
have done this for you before.


4. Bonus, you resend your series again for the nth times two years after
the last discussion.


Do you want to see some progress?

Propose something generic telling if the node pointer is for a
clocksource or a clockevent. Get agreement from everyone and then resend
your atmel rework based on this.

Thanks

  -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply index

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-14 16:26 [PATCH 0/2] add Microchip PIT64B timer Claudiu.Beznea
2019-03-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add bindings for PIT64B Claudiu.Beznea
2019-03-31  6:40   ` Rob Herring
2019-04-01  8:41   ` Nicolas.Ferre
2019-03-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] clocksource/drivers/timer-microchip-pit64b: add Microchip PIT64B support Claudiu.Beznea
2019-04-01  8:40   ` Nicolas.Ferre
2019-04-08  8:43   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-08 11:48     ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-04-08 12:11     ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-08 12:35       ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-04-08 12:42         ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-08 13:22           ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-04-08 14:01             ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-30  7:46       ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-31 10:41         ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-13 14:12           ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-06-20  8:53             ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-21 10:34               ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-06-24  8:06                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-03-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS: change section name to be more generic Claudiu.Beznea
2019-04-01  8:41   ` Nicolas.Ferre
2019-03-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] MAINTAINERS: add myself as maintainer Claudiu.Beznea
2019-04-01  8:41   ` Nicolas.Ferre
2019-03-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add timer-microchip-pit64c.c Claudiu.Beznea
2019-04-01  8:41   ` Nicolas.Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9e10fa5-dba6-e9ca-f319-036a71105b6a@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git