From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725A0C4321D for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A652087B for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:59:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32A652087B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728039AbeHVWZs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:25:48 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49130 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727877AbeHVWZr (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:25:47 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7MIxZYm157457 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:59:42 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m1c1mkmqe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:59:42 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:59:41 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.24) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:59:38 -0400 Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.106]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7MIxaHe57934068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:59:36 GMT Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F02228059; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:58:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4B028058; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oc8043147753.ibm.com (unknown [9.60.75.213]) by b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/22] guest dedicated crypto adapters To: Cornelia Huck , Tony Krowiak Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com References: <1534196899-16987-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180822121955.6767f8d3.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:59:34 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180822121955.6767f8d3.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082218-0060-0000-0000-000002A271C0 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009593; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01077325; UDB=6.00555438; IPR=6.00857300; MB=3.00022872; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-22 18:59:40 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082218-0061-0000-0000-00004641B85A Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-22_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808220187 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/22/2018 06:19 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:47:57 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> From: Tony Krowiak >> >> Notes: >> ===== >> >> Patches 1-4 (by Harald) posted with this series are forthcoming via >> Martins tree and are based on changes in the ap driver/bus that we use as a >> foundation. They have been included here because some of the functions >> in this patch series are dependent upon them. >> >> Patches 5-6 (by David) are posted with this series because they are not >> currently in our master branch. Patches 19 and 20 of this series are >> dependent upon them. I believe David's patches are available in the >> mainline now. > What's the current status of David's patches, BTW? > > It's probably easiest to rebase this upon master when the patches have > hit mainline. > > I don't have any comments beyond what I already wrote; we'll hopefully > be able to figure out that control domain stuff soon. > > Would be great to get some LGTM from the vfio-mdev folks :) > > I believe Pierre is also doing some fixing in the existing crypto vsie > code right now? Yes. I will roll his patches into my branch when available prior to posting v10. > >> This patch series works with the v6 QEMU patches. There is no new QEMU >> patchset version yet because there have been no review comments worthy of >> creating a new series; only a couple of extremely minor nits. > Probably best to repost that once the kernel part is basically through, > if just to solicit more comments. Will do. >