Re: [PATCH -next] netlabel: Fix memory leak in netlbl_mgmt_add_common

[Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>]

On 2021/6/10 11:08, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> wrote:
>> Hulk Robot reported memory leak in netlbl_mgmt_add_common.
>> The problem is non-freed map in case of netlbl_domhsh_add() failed.
>>
>> BUG: memory leak
>> unreferenced object 0xffff888100ab7080 (size 96):
>>   comm "syz-executor537", pid 360, jiffies 4294862456 (age 22.678s)
>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>     05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>     fe 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01  ................
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<0000000008b40026>] netlbl_mgmt_add_common.isra.0+0xb2a/0x1b40
>>     [<000000003be10950>] netlbl_mgmt_add+0x271/0x3c0
>>     [<00000000c70487ed>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x20e/0x320
>>     [<000000001f2ff614>] genl_rcv_msg+0x2bf/0x4f0
>>     [<0000000089045792>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x134/0x3d0
>>     [<0000000020e96fdd>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
>>     [<0000000042810c66>] netlink_unicast+0x4a0/0x6a0
>>     [<000000002e1659f0>] netlink_sendmsg+0x789/0xc70
>>     [<000000006e43415f>] sock_sendmsg+0x139/0x170
>>     [<00000000680a73d7>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x658/0x7d0
>>     [<0000000065cbb8af>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x170
>>     [<0000000019932b6c>] __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x190
>>     [<00000000643ac172>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
>>     [<000000009b79d6dc>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>>
>> Fixes: 63c416887437 ("netlabel: Add network address selectors to the NetLabel/LSM domain mapping")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
>> index e664ab990941..e7f00c0f441e 100644
>> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
>> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
>> @@ -191,6 +191,12 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>>                 entry->family = AF_INET;
>>                 entry->def.type = NETLBL_NLTYPE_ADDRSELECT;
>>                 entry->def.addrsel = addrmap;
>> +
>> +               ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_add(entry, audit_info);
>> +               if (ret_val != 0) {
>> +                       kfree(map);
>> +                       goto add_free_addrmap;
>> +               }
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>>         } else if (info->attrs[NLBL_MGMT_A_IPV6ADDR]) {
>>                 struct in6_addr *addr;
>> @@ -243,13 +249,19 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>>                 entry->family = AF_INET6;
>>                 entry->def.type = NETLBL_NLTYPE_ADDRSELECT;
>>                 entry->def.addrsel = addrmap;
>> +
>> +               ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_add(entry, audit_info);
>> +               if (ret_val != 0) {
>> +                       kfree(map);
>> +                       goto add_free_addrmap;
>> +               }
>>  #endif /* IPv6 */
>> +       } else {
>> +               ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_add(entry, audit_info);
>> +               if (ret_val != 0)
>> +                       goto add_free_addrmap;
>>         }
>>
>> -       ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_add(entry, audit_info);
>> -       if (ret_val != 0)
>> -               goto add_free_addrmap;
>> -
> Hi Shixin,
>
> I have a small suggestion about this patch: you can move the variable
> map out of if/else if branches, like the following code snippet.
>
> Be aware to assign the variable map to NULL at first. Then kfree in
> the last else branch will do nothing.
>
> I don't test the following diff, if there are any issues, please let me know.
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index ca52f5085989..1824bcd2272b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>  {
>         int ret_val = -EINVAL;
>         struct netlbl_domaddr_map *addrmap = NULL;
> +       struct netlbl_domaddr4_map *map = NULL;
>         struct cipso_v4_doi *cipsov4 = NULL;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>         struct calipso_doi *calipso = NULL;
> @@ -147,7 +148,6 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>         if (info->attrs[NLBL_MGMT_A_IPV4ADDR]) {
>                 struct in_addr *addr;
>                 struct in_addr *mask;
> -               struct netlbl_domaddr4_map *map;
>
>                 addrmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*addrmap), GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (addrmap == NULL) {
> @@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>         } else if (info->attrs[NLBL_MGMT_A_IPV6ADDR]) {
>                 struct in6_addr *addr;
>                 struct in6_addr *mask;
> -               struct netlbl_domaddr6_map *map;
>
>                 addrmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*addrmap), GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (addrmap == NULL) {
> @@ -247,8 +246,10 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_add_common(struct genl_info *info,
>         }
>
>         ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_add(entry, audit_info);
> -       if (ret_val != 0)
> +       if (ret_val != 0) {
> +               kfree(map);
>                 goto add_free_addrmap;
> +       }
>
>         return 0;
>
The type of map can be struct netlbl_domaddr4_map or struct netlbl_domaddr6_map
under different conditions. It seems like I can't put them together simply.

Thanks,
>
>
>
>>         return 0;
>>
>>  add_free_addrmap:
>> --
>> 2.18.0.huawei.25
>>
> .
>