linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:36:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaabf501-80fe-dd15-c03c-f75ce4f75877@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595327263.lk78cqolxm.astroid@bobo.none>

On 7/21/20 7:08 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> index b752d34517b3..26d8766a1106 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> @@ -31,16 +31,57 @@ static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>   
>   #else
>   extern void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
> +extern void queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(struct qspinlock *lock);
>   #endif
>   
>   static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>   {
> -	u32 val = 0;
> -
> -	if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)))
> +	atomic_t *a = &lock->val;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +again:
> +	asm volatile(
> +"1:\t"	PPC_LWARX(%0,0,%1,1) "	# queued_spin_lock			\n"
> +	: "=&r" (val)
> +	: "r" (&a->counter)
> +	: "memory");
> +
> +	if (likely(val == 0)) {
> +		asm_volatile_goto(
> +	"	stwcx.	%0,0,%1							\n"
> +	"	bne-	%l[again]						\n"
> +	"\t"	PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "						\n"
> +		:
> +		: "r"(_Q_LOCKED_VAL), "r" (&a->counter)
> +		: "cr0", "memory"
> +		: again );
>   		return;
> -
> -	queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (likely(val == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)) {
> +		asm_volatile_goto(
> +	"	stwcx.	%0,0,%1							\n"
> +	"	bne-	%l[again]						\n"
> +		:
> +		: "r"(_Q_LOCKED_VAL | _Q_PENDING_VAL), "r" (&a->counter)
> +		: "cr0", "memory"
> +		: again );
> +
> +		atomic_cond_read_acquire(a, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK));
> +//		clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
> +//		lockevent_inc(lock_pending);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
> +		int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
> +		val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(a,
> +					       (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--);
> +		if (!(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK))
> +			goto again;
> +        }
> +	queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(lock);
>   }
>   #define queued_spin_lock queued_spin_lock
>   

I am fine with the arch code override some part of the generic code.


> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> index b9515fcc9b29..ebcc6f5d99d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -287,10 +287,14 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
>   #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath	native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
> +#define queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue	native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue
>   #endif
>   
>   #endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
>   
> +void queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(struct qspinlock *lock);
> +static void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(struct qspinlock *lock);
> +
>   /**
>    * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
>    * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> @@ -314,12 +318,6 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
>    */
>   void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
>   {
> -	struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
> -	u32 old, tail;
> -	int idx;
> -
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
> -
>   	if (pv_enabled())
>   		goto pv_queue;
>   
> @@ -397,6 +395,26 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
>   queue:
>   	lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
>   pv_queue:
> +	__queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
> +
> +void queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +{
> +	lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
> +	__queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue);
> +
> +static void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath_queue(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +{
> +	struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
> +	u32 old, tail;
> +	u32 val;
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
> +
>   	node = this_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[0].mcs);
>   	idx = node->count++;
>   	tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx);
> @@ -559,7 +577,6 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
>   	 */
>   	__this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
>   }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
>   
>   /*
>    * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().
>
I would prefer to extract out the pending bit handling code out into a 
separate helper function which can be overridden by the arch code 
instead of breaking the slowpath into 2 pieces.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-21 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-06  4:35 [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-09 10:05   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-09 10:11   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-09 10:15   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-09 10:20   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-09 10:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 14:37   ` Michal Suchánek
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-09 10:53   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-09 11:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 16:06     ` Waiman Long
2020-07-23 14:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 18:32         ` Waiman Long
2020-07-23 18:47           ` peterz
2020-07-23 19:04             ` Waiman Long
2020-07-23 19:58               ` peterz
2020-07-23 20:30                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-23 21:58                 ` Waiman Long
2020-07-24  8:16             ` Will Deacon
2020-07-24 19:10               ` Waiman Long
2020-07-25  3:02                 ` Waiman Long
2020-07-25 17:26                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-25 17:36                   ` Waiman Long
2020-07-23 14:09     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-06  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] powerpc/qspinlock: optimised atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock that adds the lock hint Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-06 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks Waiman Long
2020-07-07  5:57   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-08  3:33     ` Waiman Long
2020-07-08  5:10       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-08 23:50         ` Waiman Long
2020-07-08 23:58           ` Waiman Long
2020-07-08  8:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 23:53         ` Waiman Long
2020-07-08  8:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 23:54       ` Waiman Long
2020-07-09  8:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 11:20           ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-21 11:08       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-21 14:36         ` Waiman Long [this message]
2020-07-23 13:30           ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-23 14:29             ` Waiman Long
2020-07-23 16:12               ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eaabf501-80fe-dd15-c03c-f75ce4f75877@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).