From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0BBC433F5 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239916AbhLFJHm (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:07:42 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:28027 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230492AbhLFJHj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:07:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1638781451; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eCz1k7fVnWvveVn2f/X/M5AqFdb9nW25Tyb/GRGTDTU=; b=AtEuQBixW6+sXboKsdGPyFqWvX1L9W+8wERu2gDKLZ8kaLg/QnHUFtdHqj+7nDuAgdbral mLRalGBSbNxv1M5Owx7BX0trMrSjQDaV7GB3AQWoXunKSXQlJKSNUV+2nl3HplcYnRo1OX HTeKtYRDCTX53FPwv0J/J6/O4MtOt4g= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-602-blYKVapyNT-rqgfYS1BKPA-1; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:04:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: blYKVapyNT-rqgfYS1BKPA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id s12-20020a50ab0c000000b003efdf5a226fso7740408edc.10 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:04:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eCz1k7fVnWvveVn2f/X/M5AqFdb9nW25Tyb/GRGTDTU=; b=7t9x5/txW+pi6Juj8oNrAxIDvyXaxlPEiE9L830vhJ0XUYOhqwIeUOYqmfnlY/gIBu Qznl1UkPpqT2aZGFvVSU3paa5lDrA7c61tp7CKzM9yCsxRxqVUK/1KJbkQUPcqbJgzIM ROHThik9giKOJvmsPV9V5iW2D6hgedsa3w9qFvd5VAgBXmFLwNoqx6FfFghPJ5W6W7RD cNb6nCs5JVeNgCw/5goChz/KNYyJnEMIDh8XKl7L4V3kiZTHXEzIGPX2lvJtR3DvxP4X gX3jEAxQxgNKa2xMj65tjiyJOibixCJY8GEHDUPWWerxnX0ve0noD38lqcEPMGkLUcbH s4IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lgNl9sCV41SjaqYWUXU8b4I8VkcLdYoQoT0gbsDSsO27J8vV1 8fH5QLwLD5ybWcI7pym8f/2LhVLY/0zy378NAWpFy1G0Ilf8GN1WsvN1OTnGaeTr142qVnp67Ve MLtdNH8LBKHWyZ6/wsZBpWi+g X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:354e:: with SMTP id f14mr51893434edd.245.1638781446348; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:04:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxD0cif/EQgl1GZxIYPmco6+CVBBRmPEgg+DVW4/c2W97sveNAX8oBEfwAGEcwgl6vuG5YbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:354e:: with SMTP id f14mr51893414edd.245.1638781446187; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214? (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-1054-9d19-e0f0-8214.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t20sm7410599edv.81.2021.12.06.01.04.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:04:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 10:04:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: scan: Introduce a replacement for acpi_bus_get_device() Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , LKML , Sakari Ailus References: <2828957.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher> From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <2828957.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 12/3/21 17:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > Because acpi_bus_get_device() turned out to be problematic in the past, it has > been changed to the point that its calling convention doesn't make much sense > any more (ie. the pointer passed to it as the second argument is cleared on > errors and it can only return one error value if that pointer is nonzero, so > there is some duplication of information in there) and it has to make redundant > checks. > > Moreover, its name suggests some kind of reference counting which really isn't > the case. > > Thus patch [1/2] introduces a replacement for it, called acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(), > and makes the code in scan.c use it instead of acpi_bus_get_device() internally. > > Patch [2/2] updates all of the callers of acpi_bus_get_device() within the ACPI > subsystem to use the replacement (which involves fixing a couple of bugs related > to that). Thanks, the series looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede for the series. Regards, Hans