linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 10/11] mfd: as3722: Rid driver of superfluous I2C device ID structure
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:14:22 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed57eb93-4818-bdf7-7abf-da86a6f86bca@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161107230931.GA1439@katana>

Hello Wolfram,

On 11/07/2016 08:09 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Remember that i2c_device_uevent() always reports modalias of the form
>> MODALIAS=i2c:<foo> even when your series allows to match without a I2C
>> device ID table.
> 
> Not always. Can't we do something similar like ACPI does with

Right, I meant that it always report a platform I2C modalias for both OF
and legacy platform data I2C device registration mechanisms.

> acpi_device_uevent_modalias()?
>

Yes, doing that is trivial. I posted a RFC patch about a year ago that
changes i2c_device_uevent() to report a proper OF modalias [0] as a part
of a series that fixed module autoload in a bunch of I2C drivers [1].

What's tricky is to make sure that the change won't introduce regressions
in current I2C drivers. I enumerated the possible issues if the I2C core
starts reporting OF modaliases and fixed some of them in the same series.

> I mean the whole point of this series is to remove the need of having an
> I2C device ID table...
>

Agreed, one of the issues was that the I2C table was needed anyways for
the core to match and pass a struct i2c_device_id to the probe's function.

This series solves that so once it lands, I plan to address the possible
issues in the I2C drivers and re-send [0] as a proper patch.

[0]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6903991/
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/30/519

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-07 12:47 [PATCHv7 00/11] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 01/11] i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id() Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 02/11] i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an of_node Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 03/11] i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less compatible strings Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 04/11] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed devices Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 05/11] i2c: Export i2c_match_id() for direct use by device drivers Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 06/11] i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new() call-back type Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 07/11] i2c: match dt-style device names from sysfs interface Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 19:10   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-11-14 22:27   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-11-15  9:48     ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 08/11] i2c: match vendorless strings on the internal string length Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 19:12   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-11-14 22:27   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-11-15  9:49     ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 09/11] mfd: 88pm860x: Move over to new I2C device .probe() call Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 19:13   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 10/11] mfd: as3722: Rid driver of superfluous I2C device ID structure Kieran Bingham
2016-11-07 19:20   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-11-07 22:05     ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-08  2:02       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-11-07 23:09     ` Wolfram Sang
2016-11-08  2:14       ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2016-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCHv7 11/11] [TESTPATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new Kieran Bingham
2016-11-13 18:26 ` [PATCHv7 00/11] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Wolfram Sang
2016-11-17 21:15 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed57eb93-4818-bdf7-7abf-da86a6f86bca@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=kieran@ksquared.org.uk \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).