From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DF7C3B194 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC28D217F4 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rYa9XgJG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728642AbgBNF2G (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:28:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f66.google.com ([209.85.216.66]:55370 "EHLO mail-pj1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725955AbgBNF2F (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:28:05 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f66.google.com with SMTP id d5so3373693pjz.5; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:28:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1uZtESjl7HpLdeVC/AAX+aRSr5H3TvQiHR9FhMEa2hA=; b=rYa9XgJGlI+sSN7980fT3QjT2S68H1NlrGjwKVZRQwju1aVkfz+i6F60197y56u2N0 Q9ecw4D3cLXfNibJa+ppqx46wYKmOpcAQBiCf9kkf0SEt2r6eWXiPm9dLlvJk2Smmfrf qAjzHTSW1VvaIgqY9obLf1oprqpKxdFanPQyFrA4KdhlYf2Z/GpkbVyC1kEhINp1nH+x tXTgdhp0Z7qqZTy+Wc4o7XhMAKbcizAExaqozFvJmAd8sUcoWObI4xu4LdOJWUEyEBg+ XrSmkZ9aHSWUrfz9zkNF3IIEnyF0tqA6XBfYti5U+VKpeI12T7wheVGKwbnFZa8JmToC ZWCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1uZtESjl7HpLdeVC/AAX+aRSr5H3TvQiHR9FhMEa2hA=; b=bJIHBML8alnCmCdB+RW0U/jvpH/aq81wAU7nsyTWR1SmnDhhDTfNizaKAoM0aaccIV VHop8XrzsvUZ7bOygQLMy7HrGpXJMCrrFpHLcTH1FRww2q/liYzEp+u8w/wImwjDnL/+ 9elk7ADTKEMv17H8M10L9acTXr1Tgd7pvZaq1kgwbbG5crXyYOU+laEvrzwObbYOuQ+2 kRXat6tjsK7uhKzzZQQ//MpEe2QqkEC06hafvLbykwMJC7/RoiGOFRVeMDSKjofCeyRq vDELCjYIZoMBl/3TjU/t3E1HM3LQUvWlv4WSCCqhrkKj1awT+pYGq27DqKKL0AsAHU7w 3jwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUj3VlLf61vvdcx0ru/FJyZEwMd7xfg68cjXRmBTkCjhbslTdKT gzkporVyjiOy6V0d9JSPazvfHtEi X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQytfYa5uIWf5nOsZBZa4V0DzDaJG6jHeCcVC6/11hKMQCXHcI+yiZ3VUlk9xlKDgMOyROlw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:868e:: with SMTP id g14mr1602334plo.87.1581658084987; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:28:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm4862461pja.30.2020.02.13.21.28.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:28:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/173] 4.14.171-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20200213151931.677980430@linuxfoundation.org> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:28:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200213151931.677980430@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/13/20 7:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.171 release. > There are 173 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:16:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 379 pass: 365 fail: 14 Failed tests: arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:mem128:zynq-zc702:initrd arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:mem128:zynq-zc702:rootfs arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:mem128:zynq-zc706:rootfs arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs arm64:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:initrd:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:sd:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:sata:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:nosmp:mem2G:initrd:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:nosmp:mem2G:sd:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64be:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:initrd:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64be:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:sd:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64be:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:smp:mem2G:sata:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64be:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:nosmp:mem2G:initrd:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 arm64be:xlnx-zcu102:defconfig:nosmp:mem2G:sd:rootfs:xilinx/zynqmp-ep108 Failures as reported separately. Guenter