From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A63C1799E; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708595564; cv=none; b=jhce5Se1+R2dti59stAstzk8Drwjn8vfcg8A874gpNeMFroxVr8/5QIPeWjOFD1pzwZcKmAKb7SJmBbGKN024VcOCcgVEZe8jqn4yNeWJiMP8458HaTbCACeI4+gq+zyMLBWKdT81Fyu1MIQw9qgf544jf7Yex5sizgOhETH6bg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708595564; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UtQejpj2ub5GgwVa1H1jgT4JT5ap+riBEaepGdBSwnc=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=NvBKnfLVE91Vl30F20L0kdbkoZQizACiTSN1/y8MbPN8DY2woU43jDXaEXc6C1KjfTPhjd4d0/XSGkNRwkFyTGTPX9oYeHlLAfvyqstYWO3+btAeEgNXbnpkJD+FYWY0xlHa1q728yiyLPBs1m9bZDWqafsbjA+EQqup1Bmn1+Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=L+va+wK+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="L+va+wK+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708595562; x=1740131562; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=UtQejpj2ub5GgwVa1H1jgT4JT5ap+riBEaepGdBSwnc=; b=L+va+wK+ZTtRqbj97rIJq3ZdF7U7hDDI3KHshzoz2ZF3CJOohcWjeV3b Vqm4Zw+812RfDYT01Dxo9PgZTyExlBEJR1Y4ABvPYsfHEnbgYu49AdTNW NI6Sq9NrnQf+TUrQOkAhf5kcnqmAv2kcwukIQNcn+4K/77YDso7tzkIZy nSlDZA58AbxP0ObXVpepYGuAGWvhdFTjiMfGzXv5pskGXTeL5YPaW95XY 3Ktl+OT4TGFQZ8TiDwp/fW6DUCyevxzK14y8GnBQma01DDDSThC8hnqLI UqFmNfSgt+cmvvt/uieBgdzEq6jS9Yqe3FIdM+Lo/I7nYBNaOo11Ei5iD Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10991"; a="13430390" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,177,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13430390" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2024 01:52:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,177,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="10132604" Received: from binm223x-mobl2.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.168]) ([10.249.254.168]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2024 01:52:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe/tests: Fix printf format specifiers in xe_migrate test From: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= To: David Gow , Linus Torvalds , Shuah Khan , Guenter Roeck , Rae Moar , Matthew Auld , Arunpravin Paneer Selvam , Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Kees Cook , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ma=EDra?= Canal , Rodrigo Vivi , Matthew Brost , Willem de Bruijn , Florian Westphal , Cassio Neri , Javier Martinez Canillas , Arthur Grillo Cc: Brendan Higgins , Daniel Latypov , Stephen Boyd , David Airlie , Maxime Ripard , "David S . Miller" , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:52:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20240221092728.1281499-9-davidgow@google.com> References: <20240221092728.1281499-1-davidgow@google.com> <20240221092728.1281499-9-davidgow@google.com> Autocrypt: addr=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Organization: Intel Sweden AB, Registration Number: 556189-6027 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 (3.50.3-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:27 +0800, David Gow wrote: > KUNIT_FAIL() is used to fail the xe_migrate test when an error > occurs. > However, there's a mismatch in the format specifier: '%li' is used to > log 'err', which is an 'int'. >=20 > Use '%i' instead of '%li', and for the case where we're printing an > error pointer, just use '%pe', instead of extracting the error code > manually with PTR_ERR(). (This also results in a nicer output when > the > error code is known.) >=20 > Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel > GPUs") > Signed-off-by: David Gow Ack to merge through the Kunit tree. Acked-by: Thomas Hellstr=C3=B6m