linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	allison.henderson@oracle.com, hch@lst.de,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: xfs: Deadlock between fs_reclaim and sb_internal
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:31:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee795573-6ab3-361a-d076-b464293bdcc4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello Darrick,

Lockdep is reporting a deadlock with following trace. Saw this on my
powerpc vm with 4GB of ram, running Linus/master kernel. Though, I
don't have exact testcase to reproduce it. Is this something known?


[ 1797.620389] ======================================================
[ 1797.620541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 1797.620695] 4.18.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted
[ 1797.620791] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 1797.620942] kswapd0/362 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1797.621067] 0000000001ad2774 (sb_internal){.+.+}, at: xfs_trans_alloc+0x284/0x360 [xfs]
[ 1797.621616] 
[ 1797.621616] but task is already holding lock:
[ 1797.621779] 00000000bb0609ea (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x10/0x60
[ 1797.622090] 
[ 1797.622090] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 1797.622090] 
[ 1797.622266] 
[ 1797.622266] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1797.622440] 
[ 1797.622440] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
[ 1797.622609]        fs_reclaim_acquire.part.22+0x44/0x60
[ 1797.622764]        kmem_cache_alloc+0x60/0x500
[ 1797.622983]        kmem_zone_alloc+0xb4/0x168 [xfs]
[ 1797.623220]        xfs_trans_alloc+0xac/0x360 [xfs]
[ 1797.623454]        xfs_vn_update_time+0x278/0x420 [xfs]
[ 1797.623576]        touch_atime+0xfc/0x120
[ 1797.623668]        generic_file_read_iter+0x95c/0xbd0
[ 1797.623948]        xfs_file_buffered_aio_read+0x98/0x2e0 [xfs]
[ 1797.624190]        xfs_file_read_iter+0xac/0x170 [xfs]
[ 1797.624304]        __vfs_read+0x128/0x1d0
[ 1797.624388]        vfs_read+0xbc/0x1b0
[ 1797.624476]        kernel_read+0x60/0xa0
[ 1797.624562]        prepare_binprm+0xf8/0x1f0
[ 1797.624676]        __do_execve_file.isra.13+0x7ac/0xc80
[ 1797.624791]        sys_execve+0x58/0x70
[ 1797.624880]        system_call+0x5c/0x70
[ 1797.624965] 
[ 1797.624965] -> #0 (sb_internal){.+.+}:
[ 1797.625119]        lock_acquire+0xec/0x310
[ 1797.625204]        __sb_start_write+0x18c/0x290
[ 1797.625435]        xfs_trans_alloc+0x284/0x360 [xfs]
[ 1797.625692]        xfs_iomap_write_allocate+0x230/0x470 [xfs]
[ 1797.625945]        xfs_map_blocks+0x1a8/0x610 [xfs]
[ 1797.626181]        xfs_do_writepage+0x1a8/0x9e0 [xfs]
[ 1797.626414]        xfs_vm_writepage+0x4c/0x78 [xfs]
[ 1797.626527]        pageout.isra.17+0x180/0x680
[ 1797.626640]        shrink_page_list+0xe0c/0x1470
[ 1797.626758]        shrink_inactive_list+0x3a4/0x890
[ 1797.626872]        shrink_node_memcg+0x268/0x790
[ 1797.626986]        shrink_node+0x124/0x630
[ 1797.627089]        balance_pgdat+0x1f0/0x550
[ 1797.627204]        kswapd+0x214/0x8c0
[ 1797.627301]        kthread+0x1b8/0x1c0
[ 1797.627389]        ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x88
[ 1797.627509] 
[ 1797.627509] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1797.627509] 
[ 1797.627684]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1797.627684] 
[ 1797.627820]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1797.627965]        ----                    ----
[ 1797.628072]   lock(fs_reclaim);
[ 1797.628166]                                lock(sb_internal);
[ 1797.628308]                                lock(fs_reclaim);
[ 1797.628453]   lock(sb_internal);
[ 1797.628551] 
[ 1797.628551]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1797.628551] 
[ 1797.628693] 1 lock held by kswapd0/362:
[ 1797.628779]  #0: 00000000bb0609ea (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x10/0x60
[ 1797.628955] 
[ 1797.628955] stack backtrace:
[ 1797.629067] CPU: 18 PID: 362 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc2+ #2
[ 1797.629199] Call Trace:
[ 1797.629311] [c0000000f4ebaff0] [c000000000cc4414] dump_stack+0xe8/0x164 (unreliable)
[ 1797.629473] [c0000000f4ebb040] [c0000000001a9f54] print_circular_bug.isra.17+0x284/0x3d0
[ 1797.629639] [c0000000f4ebb0e0] [c0000000001aed58] __lock_acquire+0x1d48/0x2020
[ 1797.629797] [c0000000f4ebb260] [c0000000001af7cc] lock_acquire+0xec/0x310
[ 1797.629933] [c0000000f4ebb330] [c000000000454c5c] __sb_start_write+0x18c/0x290
[ 1797.630191] [c0000000f4ebb380] [d000000009b7896c] xfs_trans_alloc+0x284/0x360 [xfs]
[ 1797.630443] [c0000000f4ebb3e0] [d000000009b58958] xfs_iomap_write_allocate+0x230/0x470 [xfs]
[ 1797.630710] [c0000000f4ebb560] [d000000009b2c760] xfs_map_blocks+0x1a8/0x610 [xfs]
[ 1797.630961] [c0000000f4ebb5d0] [d000000009b2eb20] xfs_do_writepage+0x1a8/0x9e0 [xfs]
[ 1797.631223] [c0000000f4ebb6b0] [d000000009b2f3a4] xfs_vm_writepage+0x4c/0x78 [xfs]
[ 1797.631384] [c0000000f4ebb720] [c0000000003692e0] pageout.isra.17+0x180/0x680
[ 1797.631557] [c0000000f4ebb800] [c00000000036ccfc] shrink_page_list+0xe0c/0x1470
[ 1797.631730] [c0000000f4ebb920] [c00000000036e064] shrink_inactive_list+0x3a4/0x890
[ 1797.631912] [c0000000f4ebb9f0] [c00000000036ef48] shrink_node_memcg+0x268/0x790
[ 1797.632078] [c0000000f4ebbb00] [c00000000036f594] shrink_node+0x124/0x630
[ 1797.632213] [c0000000f4ebbbd0] [c0000000003714e0] balance_pgdat+0x1f0/0x550
[ 1797.632350] [c0000000f4ebbcd0] [c000000000371a54] kswapd+0x214/0x8c0
[ 1797.632488] [c0000000f4ebbdc0] [c0000000001506b8] kthread+0x1b8/0x1c0
[ 1797.632624] [c0000000f4ebbe30] [c00000000000c3d4] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x88


Thanks,
Ravi


             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28  4:01 Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2018-06-29  6:18 ` xfs: Deadlock between fs_reclaim and sb_internal Chandan Rajendra
2018-07-01  9:30   ` Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee795573-6ab3-361a-d076-b464293bdcc4@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).