Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] lib, stackdepot: Add helper to print stack entries.

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 9/2/21 02:01, Imran Khan wrote:
> To print a stack entries, users of stackdepot, first
> use stack_depot_fetch to get a list of stack entries
> and then use stack_trace_print to print this list.
> Provide a helper in stackdepot to print stack entries
> based on stackdepot handle.
> Also change above mentioned users to use this helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  include/linux/stackdepot.h |  2 ++
>  lib/stackdepot.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  mm/kasan/report.c          | 15 +++------------
>  mm/page_owner.c            | 13 ++++---------
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/stackdepot.h b/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> index 6bb4bc1a5f54..d77a30543dd4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  unsigned int stack_depot_fetch(depot_stack_handle_t handle,
>  			       unsigned long **entries);
>  
> +void stack_depot_print(depot_stack_handle_t stack);
> +
>  unsigned int filter_irq_stacks(unsigned long *entries, unsigned int nr_entries);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
> index 67439c082490..873aeb152f52 100644
> --- a/lib/stackdepot.c
> +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,23 @@ static inline struct stack_record *find_stack(struct stack_record *bucket,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * stack_depot_print - print stack entries from a depot
> + *
> + * @handle:		Stack depot handle which was returned from
> + *			stack_depot_save().
> + *
> + */
> +void stack_depot_print(depot_stack_handle_t stack)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *entries;
> +	unsigned int nr_entries;
> +
> +	nr_entries = stack_depot_fetch(stack, &entries);

Maybe this should also skip stack_trace_print when nr_entries is 0, to avoid
the warning. While the callers added by this patch check handle != 0, future
ones might not.