linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:04:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef0e669e-9d08-993b-26d8-939692032cfb@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab2b910b-cd2a-d63b-f080-987d0bb4b5a5@csgroup.eu>

On 8/2/21 7:42 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 28/07/2021 à 00:26, Tom Lendacky a écrit :
>> Replace occurrences of mem_encrypt_active() with calls to prot_guest_has()
>> with the PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT attribute.
> 
> 
> What about
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Flinuxppc-dev%2Fpatch%2F20210730114231.23445-1-will%40kernel.org%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C1198d62463e04a27be5908d955b30433%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637635049667233612%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Erpu4Du05sVYkYuAfTkXdLvq48%2FlfLS2q%2FZW8DG3tFw%3D&amp;reserved=0> ?

Ah, looks like that just went into the PPC tree and isn't part of the tip
tree. I'll have to look into how to handle that one.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/head64.c                | 4 ++--
>>   arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c                   | 4 ++--
>>   arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c               | 5 ++---
>>   arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c            | 3 ++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 4 +++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c             | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c     | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c     | 6 +++---
>>   drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c               | 3 ++-
>>   drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c            | 3 ++-
>>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c                   | 3 ++-
>>   fs/proc/vmcore.c                        | 6 +++---
>>   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                    | 4 ++--
>>   13 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/start_kernel.h>
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>>   #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>>     #include <asm/processor.h>
>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ unsigned long __head __startup_64(unsigned long
>> physaddr,
>>        * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption
>>        * attribute.
>>        */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>           vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted;
>>           vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted;
>>           for (; vaddr < vaddr_end; vaddr += PMD_SIZE) {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> index 0f2d5ace5986..5e1c1f5cbbe8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static bool __init
>> early_memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>>   bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned
>> long size,
>>                    unsigned long flags)
>>   {
>> -    if (!mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (!prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return true;
>>         if (flags & MEMREMAP_ENC)
>> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ pgprot_t __init
>> early_memremap_pgprot_adjust(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>>   {
>>       bool encrypted_prot;
>>   -    if (!mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (!prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return prot;
>>         encrypted_prot = true;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> index 451de8e84fce..0f1533dbe81c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> @@ -364,8 +364,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long
>> vaddr, unsigned long size)
>>   /*
>>    * SME and SEV are very similar but they are not the same, so there are
>>    * times that the kernel will need to distinguish between SME and SEV.
>> The
>> - * sme_active() and sev_active() functions are used for this.  When a
>> - * distinction isn't needed, the mem_encrypt_active() function can be
>> used.
>> + * sme_active() and sev_active() functions are used for this.
>>    *
>>    * The trampoline code is a good example for this requirement.  Before
>>    * paging is activated, SME will access all memory as decrypted, but SEV
>> @@ -451,7 +450,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void)
>>        * The unused memory range was mapped decrypted, change the
>> encryption
>>        * attribute from decrypted to encrypted before freeing it.
>>        */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> +    if (sme_me_mask) {
>>           r = set_memory_encrypted(vaddr, npages);
>>           if (r) {
>>               pr_warn("failed to free unused decrypted pages\n");
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> index ad8a5c586a35..6925f2bb4be1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
>>   #include <linux/vmstat.h>
>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>     #include <asm/e820/api.h>
>>   #include <asm/processor.h>
>> @@ -1986,7 +1987,7 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_dec(unsigned long
>> addr, int numpages, bool enc)
>>       int ret;
>>         /* Nothing to do if memory encryption is not active */
>> -    if (!mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (!prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return 0;
>>         /* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> index abb928894eac..8407224717df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>   #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>>   #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
>>   #include <linux/suspend.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>     #include "amdgpu.h"
>>   #include "amdgpu_irq.h"
>> @@ -1239,7 +1240,8 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>        * however, SME requires an indirect IOMMU mapping because the
>> encryption
>>        * bit is beyond the DMA mask of the chip.
>>        */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active() && ((flags & AMD_ASIC_MASK) == CHIP_RAVEN)) {
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT) &&
>> +        ((flags & AMD_ASIC_MASK) == CHIP_RAVEN)) {
>>           dev_info(&pdev->dev,
>>                "SME is not compatible with RAVEN\n");
>>           return -ENOTSUPP;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> index 546599f19a93..4d01d44012fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-buf-map.h>
>>   #include <linux/export.h>
>>   #include <linux/highmem.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <xen/xen.h>
>>     #include <drm/drm_cache.h>
>> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bool drm_need_swiotlb(int dma_bits)
>>        * Enforce dma_alloc_coherent when memory encryption is active as
>> well
>>        * for the same reasons as for Xen paravirtual hosts.
>>        */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return true;
>>         for (tmp = iomem_resource.child; tmp; tmp = tmp->sibling)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
>> index dde8b35bb950..06ec95a650ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>     #include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_aperture.h>
>> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int vmw_dma_select_mode(struct vmw_private
>> *dev_priv)
>>           [vmw_dma_map_bind] = "Giving up DMA mappings early."};
>>         /* TTM currently doesn't fully support SEV encryption. */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return -EINVAL;
>>         if (vmw_force_coherent)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c
>> index 3d08f5700bdb..0c70573d3dce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>     #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
>>   @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static unsigned long vmw_port_hb_out(struct
>> rpc_channel *channel,
>>       unsigned long msg_len = strlen(msg);
>>         /* HB port can't access encrypted memory. */
>> -    if (hb && !mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> +    if (hb && !prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>           unsigned long bp = channel->cookie_high;
>>             si = (uintptr_t) msg;
>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static unsigned long vmw_port_hb_in(struct
>> rpc_channel *channel, char *reply,
>>       unsigned long si, di, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>>         /* HB port can't access encrypted memory */
>> -    if (hb && !mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> +    if (hb && !prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>           unsigned long bp = channel->cookie_low;
>>             si = channel->cookie_high;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> index 811a49a95d04..def63a8deab4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>   #include <linux/percpu.h>
>>   #include <linux/io-pgtable.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <asm/irq_remapping.h>
>>   #include <asm/io_apic.h>
>>   #include <asm/apic.h>
>> @@ -2178,7 +2179,7 @@ static int amd_iommu_def_domain_type(struct device
>> *dev)
>>        * active, because some of those devices (AMD GPUs) don't have the
>>        * encryption bit in their DMA-mask and require remapping.
>>        */
>> -    if (!mem_encrypt_active() && dev_data->iommu_v2)
>> +    if (!prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT) && dev_data->iommu_v2)
>>           return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
>>         return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
>> index f8d4ad421e07..ac359bc98523 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/wait.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/gfp.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>     #include "amd_iommu.h"
>>   @@ -741,7 +742,7 @@ int amd_iommu_init_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> int pasids)
>>        * When memory encryption is active the device is likely not in a
>>        * direct-mapped domain. Forbid using IOMMUv2 functionality for now.
>>        */
>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           return -ENODEV;
>>         if (!amd_iommu_v2_supported())
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> index 5419c4b9f27a..ddbedb1b5b6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/property.h>
>>   #include <linux/fsl/mc.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <trace/events/iommu.h>
>>     static struct kset *iommu_group_kset;
>> @@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ static int __init iommu_subsys_init(void)
>>           else
>>               iommu_set_default_translated(false);
>>   -        if (iommu_default_passthrough() && mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> +        if (iommu_default_passthrough() &&
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>               pr_info("Memory encryption detected - Disabling default
>> IOMMU Passthrough\n");
>>               iommu_set_default_translated(false);
>>           }
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index 9a15334da208..b466f543dc00 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>>   #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <asm/io.h>
>>   #include "internal.h"
>>   @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ ssize_t __weak elfcorehdr_read(char *buf, size_t
>> count, u64 *ppos)
>>    */
>>   ssize_t __weak elfcorehdr_read_notes(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
>>   {
>> -    return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, mem_encrypt_active());
>> +    return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0,
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT));
>>   }
>>     /*
>> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffer, size_t
>> buflen, loff_t *fpos,
>>                           buflen);
>>               start = m->paddr + *fpos - m->offset;
>>               tmp = read_from_oldmem(buffer, tsz, &start,
>> -                           userbuf, mem_encrypt_active());
>> +                           userbuf, prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT));
>>               if (tmp < 0)
>>                   return tmp;
>>               buflen -= tsz;
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
>> index e50df8d8f87e..2e8dee23a624 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/highmem.h>
>>   #include <linux/gfp.h>
>>   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>   #include <linux/set_memory.h>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device
>> *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
>>       if (!mem)
>>           panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now
>> provide you with the DMA bounce buffer");
>>   -    if (mem_encrypt_active())
>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>>           pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using
>> DMA bounce buffers\n");
>>         if (mapping_size > alloc_size) {
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27 22:26 [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 16:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-02 10:34   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-11 14:53   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 15:39     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29 14:24     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:35   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:37   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:42   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:45   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-09 21:59     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:08       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-30 22:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 21:55     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 12:42   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-09 22:04     ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-08-10 18:45   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 19:48     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 20:09       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 12:19       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 15:52         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-12 10:07           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-13 17:08             ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:47   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:46   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-08-09  1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:16   ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef0e669e-9d08-993b-26d8-939692032cfb@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).