From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
<Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>, <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
<adouglas@cadence.com>, <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI: dwc: Rework MSI callbacks handler
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef846300-1606-397e-c790-45ddee6b2417@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6320411aa93d76e3e861f6275cebb1caf6cf893.1529329262.git.gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Hi,
On Monday 18 June 2018 08:30 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Remove duplicate defines located on pcie-designware.h file already
> available on /include/uapi/linux/pci-regs.h file.
>
> Add pci_epc_set_msi() maximum 32 interrupts validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> ---
> Change v1->v2:
> - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
> Change v2->v3:
> - Replaced wrong return value 0 to -EINVAL.
> Change v3->v4:
> - Rebased to Lorenzo's master branch v4.18-rc1.
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 11 ------
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index ad25654..89d9e52 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -246,29 +246,38 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>
> static int dw_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
> {
> - int val;
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + u32 val, reg;
> +
> + if (!ep->msi_cap)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL);
> - if (!(val & MSI_CAP_MSI_EN_MASK))
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> + if (!(val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - val = (val & MSI_CAP_MME_MASK) >> MSI_CAP_MME_SHIFT;
> + val = (val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QSIZE) >> 4;
> +
> return val;
> }
>
> -static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 encode_int)
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts)
> {
> - int val;
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + u32 val, reg;
>
> - val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL);
> - val &= ~MSI_CAP_MMC_MASK;
> - val |= (encode_int << MSI_CAP_MMC_SHIFT) & MSI_CAP_MMC_MASK;
> + if (!ep->msi_cap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> + val &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK;
> + val |= (interrupts << 1) & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK;
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> - dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL, val);
> + dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, reg, val);
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -367,21 +376,29 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
> u16 msg_ctrl, msg_data;
> - u32 msg_addr_lower, msg_addr_upper;
> + u32 msg_addr_lower, msg_addr_upper, reg;
> u64 msg_addr;
> bool has_upper;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!ep->msi_cap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* Raise MSI per the PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0, 6.8.1. */
> - msg_ctrl = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL);
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> + msg_ctrl = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> has_upper = !!(msg_ctrl & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
> - msg_addr_lower = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_L32);
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO;
> + msg_addr_lower = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
> if (has_upper) {
> - msg_addr_upper = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_U32);
> - msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_64);
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI;
> + msg_addr_upper = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg);
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_DATA_64;
> + msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> } else {
> msg_addr_upper = 0;
> - msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_32);
> + reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_DATA_32;
> + msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> }
> msg_addr = ((u64) msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
> ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index b22c5bb..a0ab12f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -96,17 +96,6 @@
> #define PCIE_GET_ATU_INB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(region) \
> ((0x3 << 20) | ((region) << 9) | (0x1 << 8))
>
> -#define MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL 0x52
> -#define MSI_CAP_MMC_SHIFT 1
> -#define MSI_CAP_MMC_MASK (7 << MSI_CAP_MMC_SHIFT)
> -#define MSI_CAP_MME_SHIFT 4
> -#define MSI_CAP_MSI_EN_MASK 0x1
> -#define MSI_CAP_MME_MASK (7 << MSI_CAP_MME_SHIFT)
> -#define MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_L32 0x54
> -#define MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_U32 0x58
> -#define MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_32 0x58
> -#define MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_64 0x5C
> -
> #define MAX_MSI_IRQS 256
> #define MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL 32
> #define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> index c72e656..094dcc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ int pci_epc_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts)
> u8 encode_int;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
> + interrupts > 32)
> return -EINVAL;
This is not related to $patch->subject
Thanks
Kishon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 15:00 [PATCH v4 00/10] Add MSI-X support on pcitest tool Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: endpoint: Add MSI-X interfaces Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 19:12 ` [RFC PATCH] PCI: dwc: dw_pcie_ep_find_capability() can be static kbuild test robot
2018-06-20 9:23 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-20 6:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-06-20 9:26 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Update xxx_pcie_ep_raise_irq() and pci_epc_raise_irq() signatures Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 18:17 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-18 18:57 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-18 19:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-20 9:11 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-20 6:47 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-06-20 10:05 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI: dwc: Rework MSI callbacks handler Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-20 6:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2018-06-20 10:20 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] PCI: dwc: Add legacy interrupt callback handler Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] pci-epf-test/pci_endpoint_test: Cleanup PCI_ENDPOINT_TEST memspace Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-20 7:53 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-06-20 14:18 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] pci-epf-test/pci_endpoint_test: Use irq_type module parameter Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] pci-epf-test/pci_endpoint_test: Add MSI-X support Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] pci_endpoint_test: Add 2 ioctl commands Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-20 7:58 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-06-20 14:28 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2018-06-18 15:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] tools: PCI: Add MSI-X support Gustavo Pimentel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef846300-1606-397e-c790-45ddee6b2417@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=adouglas@cadence.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).