From: "eric miao" <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: "Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net>,
"Bill Gatliff" <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
"Haavard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>,
"Andrew Victor" <andrew@sanpeople.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@mvista.com>,
"Paul Mundt" <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben@trinity.fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:11:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f17812d70711272111g4fe1abeeo7b1ec31d547975b6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711271129.46754.david-b@pacbell.net>
Sorry, I thought you want a preliminary one, here's the one
tested and including your comments except for one:
if caller holds gpio_lock, gpio_ensure_requested() is actually
safe.
please review:
---
include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 35 +++-----
lib/gpiolib.c | 212 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
index 869b739..34e60ba 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
@@ -14,14 +14,22 @@
*/
#ifndef ARCH_NR_GPIOS
-#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 512
+#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 256
#endif
-#ifndef ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP
-#define ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP BITS_PER_LONG
+struct seq_file;
+struct gpio_chip;
+
+struct gpio_desc {
+ struct gpio_chip *chip;
+ unsigned is_out:1;
+ unsigned requested:1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
+ const char *requested_label;
#endif
+};
-struct seq_file;
+extern struct gpio_desc gpio_desc[ARCH_NR_GPIOS];
/**
* struct gpio_chip - abstract a GPIO controller
@@ -41,8 +49,6 @@ struct seq_file;
* (base + ngpio - 1).
* @can_sleep: flag must be set iff get()/set() methods sleep, as they
* must while accessing GPIO expander chips over I2C or SPI
- * @is_out: bit array where bit N is true iff GPIO with offset N has been
- * called successfully to configure this as an output
*
* A gpio_chip can help platforms abstract various sources of GPIOs so
* they can all be accessed through a common programing interface.
@@ -70,17 +76,6 @@ struct gpio_chip {
int base;
u16 ngpio;
unsigned can_sleep:1;
-
- /* other fields are modified by the gpio library only */
- DECLARE_BITMAP(is_out, ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
- /* fat bits */
- const char *requested[ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP];
-#else
- /* thin bits */
- DECLARE_BITMAP(requested, ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP);
-#endif
};
/* returns true iff a given gpio signal has been requested;
@@ -89,11 +84,7 @@ struct gpio_chip {
static inline int
gpiochip_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
- return chip->requested[offset] != NULL;
-#else
- return test_bit(offset, chip->requested);
-#endif
+ return gpio_desc[chip->base + offset].requested;
}
/* add/remove chips */
diff --git a/lib/gpiolib.c b/lib/gpiolib.c
index a853715..6050af5 100644
--- a/lib/gpiolib.c
+++ b/lib/gpiolib.c
@@ -28,39 +28,30 @@
#define extra_checks 0
#endif
-/* gpio_lock protects the table of chips and gpio_chip->requested.
+/* gpio_lock protects the table of gpio_desc[] and desc->requested.
* While any GPIO is requested, its gpio_chip is not removable;
* each GPIO's "requested" flag serves as a lock and refcount.
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpio_lock);
-static struct gpio_chip *chips[DIV_ROUND_UP(ARCH_NR_GPIOS,
- ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP)];
-
+struct gpio_desc gpio_desc[ARCH_NR_GPIOS];
/* Warn when drivers omit gpio_request() calls -- legal but
* ill-advised when setting direction, and otherwise illegal.
*/
-static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned gpio)
{
- int requested;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
- requested = (int) chip->requested[offset];
- if (!requested)
- chip->requested[offset] = "[auto]";
-#else
- requested = test_and_set_bit(offset, chip->requested);
+ if (!desc->requested)
+ desc->requested_label = "(auto)";
#endif
-
- if (!requested)
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "GPIO-%d autorequested\n",
- chip->base + offset);
+ if (!desc->requested)
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "GPIO-%d autorequested\n", gpio);
}
/* caller holds gpio_lock *OR* gpio is marked as requested */
static inline struct gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
{
- return chips[gpio / ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP];
+ return gpio_desc[gpio].chip;
}
/**
@@ -75,26 +66,25 @@ static inline struct gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int status = 0;
unsigned id;
- if (chip->base < 0 || (chip->base % ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP) != 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- if ((chip->base + chip->ngpio) >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
- return -EINVAL;
- if (chip->ngpio > ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP)
+ if (chip->base < 0 || (chip->base + chip->ngpio) >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- id = chip->base / ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP;
- if (chips[id] == NULL)
- chips[id] = chip;
- else
- status = -EBUSY;
+ /* make sure the GPIOs are not claimed by any gpio_chip */
+ for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
+ if (gpio_desc[id].chip != NULL) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
+ gpio_desc[id].chip = chip;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- return status;
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
@@ -107,28 +97,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int status = 0;
- int offset;
- unsigned id = chip->base / ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP;
+ unsigned id;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- for (offset = 0; offset < chip->ngpio; offset++) {
- if (gpiochip_is_requested(chip, offset)) {
- status = -EBUSY;
- break;
+ for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
+ if (gpio_desc[id].requested) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+ return -EBUSY;
}
- }
- if (status == 0) {
- if (chips[id] == chip)
- chips[id] = NULL;
- else
- status = -EINVAL;
- }
+ for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
+ gpio_desc[id].chip = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- return status;
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
@@ -139,17 +122,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
*/
int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
{
- struct gpio_chip *chip;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
int status = -EINVAL;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
- if (!chip)
- goto done;
- gpio -= chip->base;
- if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
+ desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+
+ if (desc->chip == NULL)
goto done;
/* NOTE: gpio_request() can be called in early boot,
@@ -157,18 +138,16 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
*/
status = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
- if (!label)
- label = "?";
- if (chip->requested[gpio])
- status = -EBUSY;
+
+ if (!desc->requested)
+ desc->requested = 1;
else
- chip->requested[gpio] = label;
-#else
- if (test_and_set_bit(gpio, chip->requested))
status = -EBUSY;
-#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
+ if (status == 0)
+ desc->requested_label = (label == NULL) ? "?" : label;
+#endif
done:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
return status;
@@ -178,27 +157,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_request);
void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
{
unsigned long flags;
- struct gpio_chip *chip;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
- if (!chip)
- goto done;
- gpio -= chip->base;
- if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
+ desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+
+ if (desc->chip == NULL)
goto done;
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
- if (chip->requested[gpio])
- chip->requested[gpio] = NULL;
+ if (desc->requested)
+ desc->requested = 0;
else
- chip = NULL;
-#else
- if (!test_and_clear_bit(gpio, chip->requested))
- chip = NULL;
+ WARN_ON(extra_checks);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
+ desc->requested_label = NULL;
#endif
- WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip == NULL);
done:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
}
@@ -218,17 +193,22 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
int status = -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
+ desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+ chip = desc->chip;
+
+ gpio_ensure_requested(desc, gpio);
+
if (!chip || !chip->get || !chip->direction_input)
goto fail;
+
gpio -= chip->base;
if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
goto fail;
- gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio);
/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */
@@ -238,7 +218,7 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
status = chip->direction_input(chip, gpio);
if (status == 0)
- clear_bit(gpio, chip->is_out);
+ desc->is_out = 0;
return status;
fail:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
@@ -250,17 +230,22 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
int status = -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
+ desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+ chip = desc->chip;
+
+ gpio_ensure_requested(desc, gpio);
+
if (!chip || !chip->set || !chip->direction_output)
goto fail;
+
gpio -= chip->base;
if (gpio >= chip->ngpio)
goto fail;
- gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio);
/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */
@@ -270,7 +255,7 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
status = chip->direction_output(chip, gpio, value);
if (status == 0)
- set_bit(gpio, chip->is_out);
+ desc->is_out = 1;
return status;
fail:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
@@ -363,29 +348,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_set_value_cansleep);
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
-
-static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
+static int gpiolib_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
- unsigned i;
+ unsigned gpio = 0;
+ unsigned offset;
+
+ /* REVISIT this isn't locked against gpio_chip removal ... */
- for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
- unsigned gpio;
- int is_out;
+ seq_printf(s, "gpio chip_name requested direction value irq\n");
- if (!chip->requested[i])
+ while (gpio < ARCH_NR_GPIOS) {
+ struct gpio_desc *desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+ struct gpio_chip *chip = desc->chip;
+
+ if (chip == NULL)
continue;
- gpio = chip->base + i;
- is_out = test_bit(i, chip->is_out);
+ if (chip->dbg_show) {
+ chip->dbg_show(s, chip);
+ gpio += chip->ngpio;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ offset = gpio - chip->base;
- seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-12s) %s %s",
- gpio, chip->requested[i],
- is_out ? "out" : "in ",
- chip->get
- ? (chip->get(chip, i) ? "hi" : "lo")
- : "? ");
+ seq_printf(s, " %3d %11.11s %10.10s %9.9s %5.5s", gpio,
+ chip->label,
+ desc->requested_label,
+ (desc->is_out) ? "out" : "in",
+ (chip->get) ?
+ (chip->get(chip, offset) ? "hi" : "lo")
+ : "?");
- if (!is_out) {
+ if (!desc->is_out) {
int irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
@@ -430,32 +425,7 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s,
struct gpio_chip *chip)
}
seq_printf(s, "\n");
- }
-}
-
-static int gpiolib_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
-{
- struct gpio_chip *chip;
- unsigned id;
- int started = 0;
-
- /* REVISIT this isn't locked against gpio_chip removal ... */
-
- for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(chips); id++) {
- chip = chips[id];
- if (!chip)
- continue;
-
- seq_printf(s, "%sGPIOs %d-%d, %s%s:\n",
- started ? "\n" : "",
- chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
- chip->label ? : "generic",
- chip->can_sleep ? ", can sleep" : "");
- started = 1;
- if (chip->dbg_show)
- chip->dbg_show(s, chip);
- else
- gpiolib_dbg_show(s, chip);
+ gpio++;
}
return 0;
}
--
1.5.2.5.GIT
On Nov 28, 2007 3:29 AM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007, eric miao wrote:
> > status = chip->direction_input(chip, gpio);
> > -if (status == 0)
> > -clear_bit(gpio, chip->is_out);
> > +if (status)
> > +desc->is_out = 0;
>
> You added that same bug in two places (direction_output too).
> Only zero status means success; otherwise it's negative errno.
>
> Clearly this patch wasn't tested at all.
>
--
Cheers
- eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200710291809.29936.david-b@pacbell.net>
2007-10-30 1:51 ` [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework David Brownell
2007-11-05 21:05 ` David Brownell
2007-11-13 2:28 ` eric miao
2007-11-13 19:06 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 0:57 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 1:00 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 1:02 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 1:03 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 1:04 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 1:04 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 4:36 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 6:51 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 7:19 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 7:36 ` eric miao
2007-11-17 10:38 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-17 17:36 ` David Brownell
2007-11-20 15:20 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-14 4:18 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 6:46 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 3:28 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 3:25 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 3:53 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 6:37 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 3:30 ` David Brownell
2007-11-14 6:40 ` eric miao
2007-11-14 7:08 ` David Brownell
2007-11-27 1:46 ` David Brownell
2007-11-27 10:58 ` eric miao
2007-11-27 17:26 ` David Brownell
2007-11-27 19:03 ` David Brownell
2007-11-27 19:29 ` David Brownell
2007-11-28 5:11 ` eric miao [this message]
2007-11-28 3:15 ` [patch/rfc 2.6.24-rc3-mm] gpiolib grows a gpio_desc David Brownell
2007-11-28 9:10 ` eric miao
2007-11-28 9:53 ` David Brownell
2007-10-30 1:51 ` [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver David Brownell
2007-11-30 12:32 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 13:04 ` Bill Gatliff
2007-11-30 13:36 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 14:09 ` Bill Gatliff
2007-11-30 18:40 ` David Brownell
2007-11-30 20:13 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 20:59 ` David Brownell
2008-04-04 2:06 ` Trent Piepho
2008-04-04 2:45 ` Ben Nizette
2008-04-04 3:33 ` Trent Piepho
2008-04-04 4:57 ` Ben Nizette
2008-04-05 4:05 ` userspace GPIO access (WAS: [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x ...) David Brownell
2008-04-07 17:56 ` Trent Piepho
2008-04-04 8:09 ` [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf875x I2C GPIO expander driver Jean Delvare
2008-04-04 19:07 ` Trent Piepho
2008-04-04 19:36 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-04 20:18 ` Trent Piepho
2008-04-05 2:51 ` David Brownell
2008-04-05 2:53 ` David Brownell
2007-12-06 3:03 ` [patch/rfc 2/4] pcf857x " David Brownell
2007-12-06 23:17 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-07 4:02 ` David Brownell
2007-10-30 1:53 ` [patch/rfc 3/4] DaVinci platform uses new GPIOLIB David Brownell
2007-10-30 1:54 ` [patch/rfc 4/4] DaVinci EVM uses pcf857x GPIO driver David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f17812d70711272111g4fe1abeeo7b1ec31d547975b6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@sanpeople.com \
--cc=ben@trinity.fluff.org \
--cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=khilman@mvista.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).