linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] rcu: Limit rcu_capacity[] size to RCU_NUM_LVLS items
Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2015 09:34:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f23c9a049f317e5dfdfdafc229f85b5924702a31.1425889432.git.agordeev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1425889432.git.agordeev@redhat.com>

Number of items in rcu_capacity[] array is defined by macro
MAX_RCU_LVLS. However, that array is never accessed beyond
RCU_NUM_LVLS index. Therefore, we can limit the array to
RCU_NUM_LVLS items and eliminate MAX_RCU_LVLS. As result,
in most cases the memory is conserved.

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 12 ++++++------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 98e36c3..dbcec66 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3924,19 +3924,19 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 		"rcu_node_0",
 		"rcu_node_1",
 		"rcu_node_2",
-		"rcu_node_3" };  /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
+		"rcu_node_3" };
 	static const char * const fqs[] = {
 		"rcu_node_fqs_0",
 		"rcu_node_fqs_1",
 		"rcu_node_fqs_2",
-		"rcu_node_fqs_3" };  /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
+		"rcu_node_fqs_3" };
 	static u8 fl_mask = 0x1;
 	int cpustride = 1;
 	int i;
 	int j;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RCU_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf));  /* Fix buf[] init! */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(RCU_NUM_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf));  /* Fix buf[] init! */
 
 	/* Silence gcc 4.8 warning about array index out of range. */
 	if (rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
@@ -4008,7 +4008,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
 {
 	ulong d;
 	int i;
-	int rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS];
+	int rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialize any unspecified boot parameters.
@@ -4035,7 +4035,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
 	 * with the given number of levels.
 	 */
 	rcu_capacity[0] = rcu_fanout_leaf;
-	for (i = 1; i < MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
+	for (i = 1; i < RCU_NUM_LVLS; i++)
 		rcu_capacity[i] = rcu_capacity[i - 1] * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT;
 
 	/*
@@ -4048,7 +4048,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
 	 * the rcu_node masks.  Complain and fall back to the compile-
 	 * time values if these limits are exceeded.
 	 */
-	if (nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS - 1])
+	if (nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS - 1])
 		panic("rcu_init_geometry: rcu_capacity[] is too small");
 	else if (rcu_fanout_leaf < CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
 		 rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) {
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index f358a83..661d2d4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
  * In practice, this did work well going from three levels to four.
  * Of course, your mileage may vary.
  */
-#define MAX_RCU_LVLS 4
 #define RCU_FANOUT_1	      (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
 #define RCU_FANOUT_2	      (RCU_FANOUT_1 * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
 #define RCU_FANOUT_3	      (RCU_FANOUT_2 * CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT)
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-09  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09  8:34 [PATCH 00/10] rcu: Cleanup RCU tree initialization Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] rcu: Remove superfluous local variable in rcu_init_geometry() Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_geometry() capacity arithmetics Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] rcu: Limit rcu_state::levelcnt[] to RCU_NUM_LVLS items Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] rcu: Remove unnecessary fields from rcu_state structure Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] rcu: Limit count of static data to the number of RCU levels Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] rcu: Simplify arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  8:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] rcu: Remove unnecessary grpnum field from rcu_node structure Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09  9:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] rcu: Cleanup RCU tree initialization Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-09 21:35   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10 14:33     ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-10 14:57       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-09 21:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-09 23:39   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-09 23:49     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10  4:43       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10 14:39         ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-03-10 14:52           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f23c9a049f317e5dfdfdafc229f85b5924702a31.1425889432.git.agordeev@redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).