From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D754C433EF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA461130 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238783AbhINDY1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:24:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]:39456 "EHLO mail-pf1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238901AbhINDYV (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:24:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id e16so10837585pfc.6; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:23:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sXdm6Z9DA7+o083V6MRzxK6U4l2Js+yCvrccU9cF5zI=; b=ZfxkElickV39K5h0mR398p2NRoiwDbirXc9AuBkj6a4FkXsaCzSSA3PgB7cFe2YVMJ h7Ip7z11I5x9+FE5U72XUGVwEcm7zg9A2X5p3MhrpGtF2cbdRHdO68dLTlf3OPNoxqUV 9Yn/DHAGH3baHHHViMKvIZT9KV+Xe7/rpbtg/uE0TOyhg5J1fKMMHfyQVvjkMnXdYg2C KJi5NfoRi0Hv4hLY2D0gvkI5wOGf8PoV9ijMS7hE9IW8HQIYaShH4gRh1X6ubEtMTCcf PUwBTV1xfruau58qSr4t1QjmEtSzBXcb/7vK3A10xB7MGUVvkYrxA2iygw8YuwkOVZry rUeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328+IlY3QVdyZ4zqNF3kk/4pGdcrRFII1jIkXq3HDu0vvHaLT0v PnFao5fL/7KIAXTCo747vAk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlGAYaNH88tev/TPlNavWU2YeRy3ZBTX4vmY9xLeXD+LBOR6qK35RfChI49sAR/zW/YDWxzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:7d55:: with SMTP id m21mr14079307pgn.455.1631589784451; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:647:4000:d7:e47e:ab85:4d9e:deba? ([2601:647:4000:d7:e47e:ab85:4d9e:deba]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q18sm8623247pfj.46.2021.09.13.20.23.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:23:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr Content-Language: en-US To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Kiwoong Kim , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, open list , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" , Can Guo , Adrian Hunter , sc.suh@samsung.com, hy50.seo@samsung.com, sh425.lee@samsung.com, bhoon95.kim@samsung.com References: From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/13/21 10:26, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Thanks for your input. Completely agree with you, in fact your > suggestions make sense to me. As a driver developer, surely we can > take these concerns to the IP designers and see how far we can get in > terms of standardization. That, however, is not something that can be > accomplished overnight. My main concern is, what about millions of > devices which are already in the market? UFS subsystem does support > _vops_ to handle vendor specific hooks/modifications. I am not saying > we should always follow this path, but surely until these deviations > are either fixed or become part of UFS standard itself, IMO. Hi Alim, If there are already millions of devices in the market that support this feature then that's an argument to proceed with this patch series. Thanks, Bart.