From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D582C07E85 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFE62082F for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Tb7KyShu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3FFE62082F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726532AbeLKNdL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:33:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:49118 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726203AbeLKNdK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:33:10 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBBDWdDA086348; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:32:39 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1544535159; bh=Y+yfj3rJdcOxf0IL9jSvKQdzDMJM+vVEZXfNt4j07Uc=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Tb7KyShu+CJ1Sr/oQVgZ9B3QFWgEzskbta27jwI/5VLuU33+JalBvQEk8i6d6p9gV ADZ7gewfuw4pgfKaYXMe9mZjd7LVofLGnQtOCwAy3dtt6hT+nmb7ca2rJivBi51Sjq OQuS+9W7TJhWnI/GTEVaTXvkmkfVldM9MQ69Ukeg= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBBDWdua082186 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:32:39 -0600 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:32:39 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:32:39 -0600 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBBDWZLB030930; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:32:35 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am654-base-board: Add MMC/SD support To: Tony Lindgren , Nishanth Menon CC: Faiz Abbas , , , , , , , , , , , Arnd Bergmann References: <20181207084233.13700-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20181207084233.13700-3-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20181208155427.jmidz4vsw4k4qj36@akan> <20181210120647.i3ply3p7umvedb3u@akan> <20181210234730.GH6707@atomide.com> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:02:34 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181210234730.GH6707@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, On 11/12/18 5:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Nishanth Menon [181210 12:07]: >> I really am curious how Arnd / Tony actually pull this one off.. If they >> have continous cron job for checking if your patch is ready... I doubt >> it.. > > The only way that works in a distributed manner is for the patch > authors to resend after the dependencies have cleared. > > As some people don't know this, at least I try to reply with > something about tagging patch as read and assuming it will get > resent after dependencies have cleard. > > Otherwise the todo list just keeps growing eternally :) Alright, if the preference is to resend patches after dependencies are cleared, I think it will also be better to mark the initial review-only version as "RFC" (as Nishanth requested). Thanks, Sekhar