From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] devfreq: tegra30: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_opp()
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:28:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f33334e7-bd28-af82-b557-681a2b4132da@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122062659.qss3hef4kltfgciu@vireshk-i7>
22.01.2021 09:26, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 22-01-21, 00:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 21.01.2021 14:17, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>> dev_pm_opp_set_bw() is getting removed and dev_pm_opp_set_opp() should
>>> be used instead. Migrate to the new API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>> index 117cad7968ab..d2477d7d1f66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>>> return PTR_ERR(opp);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = dev_pm_opp_set_bw(dev, opp);
>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_opp(dev, opp);
>>> dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>
>> This patch introduces a very serious change that needs to be fixed.
>>
>> Now dev_pm_opp_set_opp() changes both clock rate and bandwidth, this is
>> unacceptable for this driver because it shall not touch the clock rate.
>>
>> I think dev_pm_opp_set_bw() can't be removed.
>
> I am wondering here on what would be a better solution, do what you
> said or introduce another helper like dev_pm_opp_clear_clk(), which
> will make sure the OPP core doesn't play with device's clk.
>
Either way will work, but maybe keeping the dev_pm_opp_set_bw() is a bit
more straightforward variant for now since it will avoid the code's
changes and it's probably a bit more obvious variant for the OPP users.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 11:17 [PATCH 00/13] opp: Implement dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] opp: Rename _opp_set_rate_zero() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] opp: No need to check clk for errors Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] opp: Keep track of currently programmed OPP Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 21:41 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-22 14:31 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-25 3:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 16:31 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-01-28 4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-07 10:24 ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-07-08 7:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-09 8:57 ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-07-12 4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] opp: Split _set_opp() out of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] opp: Allow _set_opp() to work for non-freq devices Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] opp: Allow _generic_set_opp_regulator() " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] opp: Allow _generic_set_opp_clk_only() " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 20:26 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22 4:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-25 21:09 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-27 6:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] opp: Update parameters of _set_opp_custom() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] opp: Implement dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] cpufreq: qcom: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_opp() Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] devfreq: tegra30: " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 21:36 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-22 6:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-22 15:28 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2021-01-25 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-25 16:00 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-27 9:10 ` [PATCH V2 " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 10:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-27 15:58 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-28 7:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-02-01 0:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2021-02-01 19:57 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm: msm: " Viresh Kumar
2021-01-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] opp: Remove dev_pm_opp_set_bw() Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f33334e7-bd28-af82-b557-681a2b4132da@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).