linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: fix multi-statement macro checks
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 06:42:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3dadda8af7eef6613d7a4105170058f2759507d.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABJPP5CFE3KXzMzuvVxtJt5tOg8Ye6y1V7-mqT5pqazHjVWvJw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 18:57 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 6:47 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 16:03 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > > Checkpatch.pl doesn't have a check for excluding while (...) {...}
> > > blocks from MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE error.
> > > 
> > > For example, running checkpatch.pl on the file mm/access.c in the
> > > kernel generates the following error:
> > > 
> > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> > > +#define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label)        \
> > > +     while (len >= sizeof(type)) {                                   \
> > > +             __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label);        \
> > > +             dst += sizeof(type);                                    \
> > > +             src += sizeof(type);                                    \
> > > +             len -= sizeof(type);                                    \
> > > +     }
> > > 
> > > The error is misleading for this case. Enclosing it in parantheses
> > > doesn't make any sense.
> > 
> > OK
> > 
> > > Checkpatch already has an exception list for such common macro types.
> > > Added a new exception for while (...) {...} style blocks to the same.
> > > This effectively fixed the wrong error message.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > []
> > > @@ -5342,6 +5342,7 @@ sub process {
> > >                           $dstat !~ /^\.$Ident\s*=/ &&                                # .foo =
> > >                           $dstat !~ /^(?:\#\s*$Ident|\#\s*$Constant)\s*$/ &&          # stringification #foo
> > >                           $dstat !~ /^do\s*$Constant\s*while\s*$Constant;?$/ &&       # do {...} while (...); // do {...} while (...)
> > > +                         $dstat !~ /^while\s*$Constant\s*$Constant\s*$/ &&           # while (...) {...}

Note the \s*
                                                              ^

> > Did you try to output $dstat for some matching cases?
> > What was the $dstat value for the cases you tried?
> > 
> > 
> Hi,
> I did check $dstat values.
> 
> For example on file mm/maccess.c, there were two such macros:
> 
> Case 1:
> 
> $ctx:
> +#define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
> + while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
> + __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + dst += sizeof(type); \
> + src += sizeof(type); \
> + len -= sizeof(type); \
> + }
> 
> $dstat:
> while 1 1

And perhaps this test should use \s+ instead.
What is $dstat with a #define like:

#define foo(bar,baz)while(bar){bar--;baz++;}

(no spaces anywhere bot the required one after define
	
> Case 2:
> 
> $ctx:
> +#define copy_to_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
> + while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
> + __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + dst += sizeof(type); \
> + src += sizeof(type); \
> + len -= sizeof(type); \
> + }
> 
> $dstat:
> while 1 1
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Dwaipayan.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 10:33 [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: fix multi-statement macro checks Dwaipayan Ray
2020-10-01 11:12 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-10-01 13:17 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-01 13:27   ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-10-01 13:42     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-10-01 14:14       ` Dwaipayan Ray
2020-10-01 14:38         ` Joe Perches
2020-10-01 15:26           ` Joe Perches
2020-10-01 15:36             ` Dwaipayan Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3dadda8af7eef6613d7a4105170058f2759507d.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).