From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758997AbcIWLHp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:07:45 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:57624 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758196AbcIWLHm (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:07:42 -0400 Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <4d34446f-05ad-c3ce-5d33-8fb4f25af25c@users.sourceforge.net> <05418fb1-ad66-aba3-bd8c-f6b684a83279@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Emil Velikov , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:07:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:atvu0yaX1Ba+LmhpmxW/yCrND1bTvNgoHkAkOCVGX0LBHJBvWA7 QTX+bg4xthPklE0hNGVXl/4PxJdJK+7YwtfBDxS5ea3DI2Yr4JJsdH3k/oG0kTnQDoLkbx9 7qpk0JprMV+OfdQnOz8Ak7F7X5m5lypP56SJy59wsSLQ4NApwi4WMa/KmVp/EcOqxoIRyQz eQNstBgsyjF7AGW/jAYcA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XT0+GALtbzQ=:TPstmXXBMS31Wo6QcDc9Uv HQgTouF+yXfsZ+q4/Ebo1xjinHELUpNBWpxrM3vvDjThCB0gKYzUxvs8bzHkgBTaBpdzj5ix9 SGEdBRhWlHKVRJLy9zwQxSuf2a+XJc83ZElptEH6BS3rsqwPtDkQw4fGH6yOIXueYgMB4f/xt nXedynglv1mEVrZgCwGcBG0+enoHwTTmSo1m0PhRma3j+9R3bTetGi3r/vGkMC5kd/wj+PE9E kURrLsWMxzlzkL+Xrpz5i2gD4QT6YQrZ/uPuzvrsOXMYlRsyhlvqCayuI+zEWXa2Zc0uYoZRB NGvQP0c181qW8ldkzxzet9eX0BJtk4+pkRx0ZKEJdWCBYBR1awJDevkFlph7imv6e0K6sbl4v sYCH1DSHdHoMy/NRnONyj42uZ3jaNKiueT2cU8aA7FmgN+vqO1nAe5VJuI1EZG+bH26Kxkhb4 4WwbcVeiQ5hwGVgs/TVp/lTJgOzdv+WSYTdmlzkhZblkysc2RFK49UPE77s/hw/ewHaZ7c2ao r27rPDJK8pHHv+NSERgS5HWO1qHseCddbQ0Co3D4yFNUZ/weLShOJDrI7syc6WQJj/CwxgkRi 4ERz/RbhBQgnLFwp6CikFnZ7agNpEAWwjXW1ktgo0FfLGBAxaLDQheoXqFkd4Hfe7lK16vXTY RJBo7uv9yoxKIT+65a2dQm1oJMcL2mUV46+FXZ4GbgeKa8VF8UGeXqGc2fvFu/uxOk2vXt9ZS IacibAgTgfRCDNlUM08DPi0zH+8J6Lnpm3IbSXzOmpMQ4ly3iuy7HkRvSHqLLDV0GXgOO+8dK qfdvKIx Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's just the names like "out" or "restart" perfectly explain why the labels exists. I have got an other impression. > So they fulfill this requirement from the coding style as far as I can see. Short identifiers might look more convenient in some cases because they are quicker to type. > So why do you want to change them? 1. I suggest to select identifiers also for jump labels which are more meaningful and eventually unique for some function implementations. 2. How do you think about to add a single space character before any label? Regards, Markus