From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932411AbXCRPod (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932231AbXCRPod (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:33 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:24307 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932356AbXCRPoc (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UxyTgT9Ku+zcnH+Nmyj4slbbBAD4/ZlkIsCHmuzl1efzWccRsnfXPWvrHGz2r5XRUVSiqKqmDiBuk8eCSEz8jgP1gQzmKlJVkPETXqDvM8+g/ee5tAhAmplQaN2T8UE8PRPUv790TNzzA1yPhDFl7a8e1FW/ntrsLyYvu7nb9fQ= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:44:31 +0100 From: "Radoslaw Szkodzinski" To: "Mike Galbraith" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31 Cc: "Kasper Sandberg" , "Al Boldi" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org, "Linus Torvalds" , "Nicholas Miell" In-Reply-To: <1174203482.8855.8.camel@Homer.simpson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200703042335.26785.a1426z@gawab.com> <200703172048.46267.kernel@kolivas.org> <1174125534.7734.2.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <200703172355.30989.a1426z@gawab.com> <1174198651.8199.44.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1174200463.10498.23.camel@localhost> <1174201726.8732.6.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1174203482.8855.8.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/18/07, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Hm. Sounds rather a lot like the... > X sucks, fix X and RSDL will rock your world. RSDL is perfect. > ...that I've been getting. Blah. Nothing's perfect. Especially not computer programs. Still, it's not a smart decision on KDE's part. It will break a lot of scheduling decisions, esp. you can't use IO priorities.