linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Clear the stack
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:41:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f590b536-5b8a-0cc4-c697-31675661b351@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718211013.14512-3-labbott@redhat.com>

Hello Laura,

Thanks again for your work.
Please see some comments below.

On 19.07.2018 00:10, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Implementation of stackleak based heavily on the x86 version
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> ---
> Since last time: Minor style cleanups. Re-wrote check_alloca to
> correctly handle all stack types. While doing that, I also realized
> current_top_of_stack was incorrect so I fixed that as well.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                    |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h    | 17 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S             |  7 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c           | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile           |  3 ++-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile |  3 ++-
>  include/linux/stackleak.h             |  1 +
>  7 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 42c090cf0292..216d36a49ab5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ config ARM64
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS if COMPAT
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
> +	select HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_THREAD_STRUCT_WHITELIST
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index a73ae1e49200..4f3062ee22c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -266,5 +266,22 @@ extern void __init minsigstksz_setup(void);
>  #define SVE_SET_VL(arg)	sve_set_current_vl(arg)
>  #define SVE_GET_VL()	sve_get_current_vl()
>  
> +/*
> + * For CONFIG_STACKLEAK

Our config option is called CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK.

> + *
> + * These need to be macros because otherwise we get stuck in a nightmare
> + * of header definitions for the use of task_stack_page.
> + */
> +
> +#define current_top_of_stack()		\
> +({					\
> +	unsigned long _low = 0;		\
> +	unsigned long _high = 0;	\
> +					\
> +	current_stack_type(current, current_stack_pointer, &_low, &_high); \
> +	_high;	\
> +})

Do you really need _low here? Ah, I see this in the previous patch:
+	if (stack_low && stack_high) {
+		*stack_low = low;
+		*stack_high = high;
+	}

How about checking them against NULL separately? That would allow
+	current_stack_type(current, current_stack_pointer, NULL, &_high);

Also a minor comment - how about aligning backslashes?

> +#define on_thread_stack()	(on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer, NULL, NULL))
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* __ASM_PROCESSOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 28ad8799406f..67d12016063d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -431,6 +431,11 @@ tsk	.req	x28		// current thread_info
>  
>  	.text
>  
> +	.macro	stackleak_erase
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
> +	bl	stackleak_erase
> +#endif
> +	.endm
>  /*
>   * Exception vectors.
>   */
> @@ -910,6 +915,7 @@ ret_fast_syscall:
>  	and	x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK
>  	cbnz	x2, work_pending
>  	enable_step_tsk x1, x2
> +	stackleak_erase
>  	kernel_exit 0
>  ret_fast_syscall_trace:
>  	enable_daif
> @@ -936,6 +942,7 @@ ret_to_user:
>  	cbnz	x2, work_pending
>  finish_ret_to_user:
>  	enable_step_tsk x1, x2
> +	stackleak_erase
>  	kernel_exit 0
>  ENDPROC(ret_to_user)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index e10bc363f533..904defa36689 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -493,3 +493,35 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
>  {
>  	current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
> +void __used stackleak_check_alloca(unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long stack_left;
> +	enum stack_type type;
> +	unsigned long current_sp = current_stack_pointer;
> +	unsigned long low, high;
> +
> +	type = current_stack_type(current, current_sp, &low, &high);
> +	BUG_ON(type == STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN);
> +
> +	stack_left = current_sp - low;
> +
> +	if (size >= stack_left) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Kernel stack depth overflow is detected, let's report that.
> +		 * If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is enabled, we can safely use BUG().
> +		 * If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is disabled, BUG() handling can corrupt
> +		 * the neighbour memory. CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK calls
> +		 * panic() in a similar situation, so let's do the same if that
> +		 * option is on. Otherwise just use BUG() and hope for the best.
> +		 */
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK)
> +		panic("alloca() over the kernel stack boundary\n");
> +#else
> +		BUG();
> +#endif

This comment and #if logic should be dropped, we should always use panic() here
on arm64. Mark Rutland and I have worked out the solution for arm64 in this thread:
http://openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/05/11/12

Rationale: on arm64 with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, a stack overflow results in panic()
anyway.

> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(stackleak_check_alloca);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile
> index 4313f7475333..2fabc2dc1966 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/Makefile
> @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
>  # Makefile for Kernel-based Virtual Machine module, HYP part
>  #
>  
> -ccflags-y += -fno-stack-protector -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> +ccflags-y += -fno-stack-protector -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
> +		$(DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN)
>  
>  KVM=../../../../virt/kvm
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> index a34e9290a699..25dd2a14560d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_EFI_ARMSTUB)	+= -I$(srctree)/scripts/dtc/libfdt
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS			:= $(cflags-y) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
>  				   -D__NO_FORTIFY \
>  				   $(call cc-option,-ffreestanding) \
> -				   $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector)
> +				   $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) \
> +				   $(DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN)
>  
>  GCOV_PROFILE			:= n
>  KASAN_SANITIZE			:= n
> diff --git a/include/linux/stackleak.h b/include/linux/stackleak.h
> index b911b973d328..08420ec6b7c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stackleak.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stackleak.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>  /*
>   * Check that the poison value points to the unused hole in the
>   * virtual memory map for your platform.
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-19 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1531341400-12077-1-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com>
2018-07-18 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] Stackleak for arm64 Laura Abbott
2018-07-18 21:10   ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Introduce current_stack_type Laura Abbott
2018-07-19 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-18 21:10   ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Clear the stack Laura Abbott
2018-07-19  2:20     ` Kees Cook
2018-07-19 10:41     ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2018-07-19 11:41     ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-19 23:28 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Stackleak for arm64 Laura Abbott
2018-07-19 23:28   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] arm64: Add stack information to on_accessible_stack Laura Abbott
2018-07-20  6:38     ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-19 23:28   ` [PATCHv2 2/2] arm64: Clear the stack Laura Abbott
2018-07-20  4:33     ` Kees Cook
2018-07-20  6:39     ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 21:41 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Stackleak for arm64 Laura Abbott
2018-07-20 21:41   ` [PATCHv3 1/2] arm64: Add stack information to on_accessible_stack Laura Abbott
2018-07-20 21:41   ` [PATCHv3 2/2] arm64: Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin Laura Abbott
2018-07-24 12:44     ` Alexander Popov
2018-07-24 16:35       ` Kees Cook
2018-07-24 16:38   ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Stackleak for arm64 Will Deacon
2018-07-25 11:49     ` Will Deacon
2018-07-25 22:05       ` Laura Abbott
2018-07-26  9:55         ` Will Deacon
2018-05-02 20:33 [PATCH " Laura Abbott
2018-05-02 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Clear the stack Laura Abbott
2018-05-02 21:31   ` Kees Cook
2018-05-02 23:07     ` Laura Abbott
2018-05-02 23:37       ` Kees Cook
2018-05-03 16:05       ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-03 16:45         ` Kees Cook
2018-05-03  7:19   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-03 11:37     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-05-03 17:33     ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-03 19:09       ` Laura Abbott
2018-05-04  8:30         ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-04 11:09       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-06  8:22         ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-11 15:50           ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-11 16:13             ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-13  8:40               ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-14  5:15                 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14  9:35                   ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-14 10:06                     ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14 13:53                       ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-14 14:07                         ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-03 19:00     ` Laura Abbott
2018-05-04 11:16       ` Mark Rutland
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-21  1:13 [PATCH 0/2] Stackleak for arm64 Laura Abbott
2018-02-21  1:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Clear the stack Laura Abbott
2018-02-21 15:38   ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-21 23:53     ` Laura Abbott
2018-02-22  1:35       ` Laura Abbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f590b536-5b8a-0cc4-c697-31675661b351@linux.com \
    --to=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).