From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B31C47096 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F66E613B4 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230359AbhFBNdh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:33:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:46946 "EHLO mail-ej1-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230083AbhFBNdH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:33:07 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id b9so3805145ejc.13 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 06:31:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CmMKEjn5wAawQySc5ZWj7VIbRiSvzSHnPMe8fkp0pgw=; b=kAxAlm1SDECm+U40H38LsnsUnrYJO14WdtHq27vPyu2WTYmqehBdHDrnM4i2dVrtRp GawhKW8IWFOrqlcEVUxBbmL9F/agDS1sv8q7HZ+2hJkhz76rZvve91nV9kxYKrTp/sfv XRFmJA2DS1vwJ55grpA6mxEprRo+q4vB4fdEPQcZHj+6dpJDGFfNtrLe+MR5ouSvecq2 nD7SzKSiT2bt3up2Qdw+YAuyN46/z6clv4YfaolSuECeo4chfScIPvSRhMQ233CzyC20 Q61OmYhmKg4u5wyn/pYVnpbmNtzHUU3b7KjqCNPZtYE1u0VFITxMerKVzwAph2EuEzbk pkAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CmMKEjn5wAawQySc5ZWj7VIbRiSvzSHnPMe8fkp0pgw=; b=Y3mL7lM5a4+bPmEo/ePkhAylLROQF0Z9qHtaynfa8U4VZC1L5ezXdRiPNitbC7zUw8 EpFr9/n7I+EvJQlrPBxgfW7f53xZkPDp7KPO6WDZeg1ysAvUaCEs7HvpxCOpJnP/STM0 4Um/GG00m9p3CcS4aUcepy2+XHoP4N74SL5lF0TgnpBTkFbh0OQC9a39I0L5ilyHbuDH eoemih5QGjP1+YqPquhLF/oGlQhUmJCYu5wPrhL7XjK3HUSyw98IUnmDMaeq3ECeZ5Up arvvPNZRsGxE8589rW+CSNRi3bkUw5nGnXzJspnIX/712Eux+yRtIGXA/lZ29VWCfRFI gCpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kP3qp63NGyXF4J1KD10sEZ5I76t35LhDaDB0GBaxuSO4JXuZa b6wGA1iiYK74S7bP3R0l0P+mmQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg+epbXioL5/fO0o9gGBXzXyN7l/jPgr2tavbf7OQrtL0PJbH3WM8ENHvucWWNwIYcVXt8Hw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3818:: with SMTP id v24mr25708052ejc.197.1622640609750; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 06:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.28] (hst-221-100.medicom.bg. [84.238.221.100]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm1352966eds.79.2021.06.02.06.30.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 06:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] venus: Add a handling of QC10C compressed format To: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <20210429105815.2790770-1-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> <20210429105815.2790770-4-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> <37d5e58c-ce5b-07f8-396f-662258a9b229@xs4all.nl> From: Stanimir Varbanov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:30:08 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <37d5e58c-ce5b-07f8-396f-662258a9b229@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/21 1:01 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 29/04/2021 12:58, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >> This adds QC10C compressed pixel format in the Venus driver, and >> make it enumeratable from v4l2 clients. > > enumeratable -> possible to discover > > (or possibly 'enumerable', but I prefer the phrase suggested above) > >> >> Note: The QC10C format shouldn't be possible to enumerate by the >> client if the decoded bitstream is not 10bits. This is not > > 10bits -> 10-bits > >> implemented in this patch yet. > > Obvious question: will this be done in a later patch that is being > prepared? Would it be better to wait until such a patch is available? > Yes, It will be implemented in v2. -- regards, Stan