From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A61AC4724C for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A73D20857 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="XoXKYZkl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728933AbgEAPFm (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2020 11:05:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728839AbgEAPFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2020 11:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0417DC061A0E for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 08:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id z2so5119051iol.11 for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OywnYsOX9HSwp3HTdJRlErOVC37z2JBjZDdUK+Itl5s=; b=XoXKYZklpDZih+9yxf0ODOQ/y0+Vmxko1JosGAeZXU45gZMn6YNFWNUWCp9GuaNntH O7H5d5gaqvWtU8h0jphO0HZcqqolrQAbHqvWbezjVKK5+M8BF0kxwHFYYSbU86ZbYUKT meDetoUN6obcwwZp7R5gR4ZU0dBT+ZBlI6YhoTDNSwjlvWrUSTC1Xuelb2HLtGpyDoMC RnmB8M/kQ+XNb0UyKvOQl6BbTj667ABkx5+Uvs2tPgzCP9146Jun+CltJGNQUouL+woA xZV6R0wPt4RRMUaJC9bYDt8zAr6jnF//yUv8hXhz2L45SdSeIY1P9SYEVkNgbQgrMMd+ q/0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OywnYsOX9HSwp3HTdJRlErOVC37z2JBjZDdUK+Itl5s=; b=JHIOsGQWo3sHwklacoqB7Pp+RqG4uI9Z9cpHB5WLyjlmUDhxV8cnf69LioQJ+h5aD/ X0OjBIcaTI6Z9z3dDKHNqXVlioo8BB55t3OS/IfrrXmvIVdXLIScXUsS9s1AdUv0KQ+2 Y07DihTz0myZpizt0nT+PbHIh3bAe1elwk4JG2N5Yevax4Yvt/11vL5jlSYhmeDPnFA9 ysvDCq5b25L60HQHJ9GjVE1P2vuz6VN68QjSNaFaHDJE0CNlDKga8TsQ6bNzqdgeasbF 2MCmYR04aHkLwOmnfNAtJFjfnluGLNaxpE/FTFcdAygSoTCeGVMWWz3KVAClNtFsLnkE S13Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZMG7ZfYzPwROqUoXQmSmFbsAKFaGnpo9Hhco3DkLFoTtf8WV60 74skrbdqCeLTYK4QBYV4AKYk4O0ieAZXIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKJmeTbRVpekRlRZX2ChMEx0WDcl6JX+ShhzejzFCOyGuQBkN1mqfwiMRrg1Cnf8jtwyxEEXg== X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9518:: with SMTP id r24mr4292114ioj.209.1588345538701; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.159] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i20sm1047218ioj.14.2020.05.01.08.05.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2020 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] small fixes for-5.7 To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 09:05:37 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/1/20 8:09 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > I split the sent patchset, please consider this part for current. > > I'll send a test for [1] in a day or so. > > Regarding [3], Jens, I haven't looked properly yet, how long > splice can wait on a inode mutex, but it can be problematic, > especially for latencies. How about go safe for-5.7, and > maybe think something out for next? Agree, let's play it safe for 5.7, and look further into expanding this for 5.8 so we don't always have to go async. Series looks good to me, applied. Thanks Pavel! -- Jens Axboe