From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66E0C35646 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799182071E for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Oh4yKSqG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728085AbgBUL6I (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:58:08 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:41750 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726909AbgBUL6I (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:58:08 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01LBvPlh111162; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:57:25 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1582286245; bh=Ca1Ao9NtXuhmJPeqJptGJBStA1MND4WCzKzNh1qZtpg=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Oh4yKSqGkFTzIqFMzqY9N/dImJirRcjrlWjGYeJV2FP2ENhKbHcnC76WYzeLaORft xarnHFZd1UCzwbOgBwrHHzCW5GlfZR70ed2krU9TFdirYwAO/tDno457gPvQxLn1lU ugZ0V9Pme09X4wFs2Q8jd+yJeEDT8QwxIY/xHFZU= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01LBvPb3119241 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:57:25 -0600 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:57:24 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:57:25 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01LBvLDj075165; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:57:21 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/344] 5.4.22-stable review To: Naresh Kamboju , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "tony@atomide.com" CC: open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , , Ben Hutchings , , linux- stable , linux-tegra , Arnd Bergmann , Jon Hunter References: <20200221072349.335551332@linuxfoundation.org> <529a5a4a-974e-995a-9556-c2a14d09bb5d@nvidia.com> From: Tero Kristo Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:57:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/02/2020 13:17, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 15:34, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> >> On 21/02/2020 07:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.22 release. >>> There are 344 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun, 23 Feb 2020 07:19:49 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.22-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >>> ------------- >>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: >> >> ... >> >>> Tero Kristo >>> ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support >> >> >> The above commit is generating the following build error on ARM systems ... >> >> dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error: linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory >> #include >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > build error: > > ../arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error: > linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory > 27 | #include > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > compilation terminated. > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:265: > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.o] Error 1 > > With these below three patches, it applies cleanly and builds. > But I'm not sure these are not expected to get into stable rc 5.4 branch. Yeah, without PRM driver the pdata-quirk patch should not have been picked up. I wonder why it ended up in stable. Tony, any ideas? -Tero > > 3e99cb214f03 ("soc: ti: add initial PRM driver with reset control support") > c5117a78dd88 ("soc: ti: omap-prm: poll for reset complete during de-assert") > d30cd83f6853 ("soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for > reset clockdomain") > > However, it's only patch > d30cd83f6853 ("soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for > reset clockdomain") > that introduces file linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h > > -- > Linaro LKFT > https://lkft.linaro.org > -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki