From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752546AbdK1Oox (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:44:53 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:59441 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752302AbdK1Oov (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:44:51 -0500 Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <24f8c777-1eb4-e7e7-9371-79f32700c9dc@users.sourceforge.net> <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net> <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net> <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net> <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net> <3b7b24bd-4bdf-752e-1a62-cc71e9152acc@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:44:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LkN3tF4fsppC42Uk4VMcB7wcf+F9EMzHccLQLV08cJJgRMsp4ep WlHgaaQ/wyoswPkTzFD7yEdyMYcI8tqiPFflx5WNCOCPaMyDbAgruav/rUj07TAgn2K9TEK ufBF8Tyh2ytwi/I/MDIapLxv0Ni2voQNjqKnHjpGjUD4mFGPYZci3ukAJOg4Auzbu4L4J/Z ekmqLDeRzPJcfWgh3/P1w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QWIF+hJy4P4=:oou+KM4MSkc+jaOzi70MmQ r8cZ7gGGfLBcyWzAYqjS3fdzMKDsOdXn9AuY6yGj+SMJZIbgYx+fMCFauIkQ9ISPy4dQqEDp0 1cMD9DzAi4PPash8T+REHtIw+IBi6l/NpG5BEQZ7fEO0HFnZr+64QpLtkigfRkrf1xQEzoAHB 8bY0xqv/ZIMlQVNWd6+wTGIFk6lVQIiZFuqPSkQ2MBApVwgl/Ecoz/WrZAH0I1sKaz5FT2ZTb NsHv6GEn7KkTf5wF3FRvwUzadfB9dp10cMTY2vi0b+JN6mZFm3wykUCRPDKX+8NXOoO8YKYqQ OtrHuWbYY2BeKf7Rw2+GobkoZ6HQ9qGxTpNDR+adxrEe3rMqiQgq9W2I24P53Vqp1ppnh4+q2 Zwo6JpIypAkEVpI/P9eoFraakZIqlJ+sjoza110x5Ucgj/YEG+sBBR7GaIAtlcFnioDW+1rph 8X7MR80Td+7AxRXann1pjG0GVAU6nrKpITs/kOnIwJgRDdlV9vPFXz0Lk6J2rVD86J1ENudd5 KIPhbtuk+OdGR2BY9BMcgwojbjjvhWt0HOut7ZxPaEH5AeWVMso4XlSjGXnKpM8EgBd4NquKr r/Usgea+3BPNvQldvUVo424CEk1BkAg9vd2BfPYTUrDbyXfdSrEdoxk62l7DROIdOr0b8PDtf s0IVVlMkirwyPJAG80HVTjfUbZQMfkyLMm/uRJvgYl8kgNpyNawyQ6AbiV+KtWdTf0zibQ+OK Mn/YdowiDiR8PhKwNJ1s59kPqIdfMwJ3PCJG2GE9UdpKmN+bskWvq/SQYkPhOv2tZpjL7RLD1 m8+ySRtHQeJrfjW55NoWbkpQOBF9h3ZNzoNXzB0VQS+HvFlm2I= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> How would such a setting influence my trust level for your subsystem maintenance? > > Give the test result before speaking too much. Which concrete data do you expect here? > It's already way too contra-productive, just chatting. I got an other view. I hope that we can achieve a better common understanding also in this case. > Show the result at first. Which one would you like to compare exactly? Regards, Markus