From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F64C433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47E32080C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="qD/yDq3D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727893AbgIIUEl (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:04:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725772AbgIIUEk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:04:40 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9903AC061573; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Jvm77/90HJwYlfYPmRWddMCR1SEU0mTsLpsMQ1Ko468=; b=qD/yDq3DH2haYhqEJ+5QHtsEP9 ad4v7Ils7MwCrW3lZqFPjpk8dNcZWVDqGuNfwwjFzlI3aAztH+dHxVoR4WMVGVjAvKrCqKcXGyaF2 KalLAJbKAvE45F8oVW8szWLyVl0Hz07dsINhg7Ut4LHR2enTGbg8aszl1U8TpJdQ9OXtC8ygbB+vM 8rQJIZi0WLpt1q9LzfHCZSQZoUydYfN8SQQ/TCf4dDh/++G7Tp89QtTcSfCqjtpdgNrx30xw/QPT2 PDQD3kl+D/f2CUKABTtW/JzWgackM6lmfvKgaOnE5BFSKUqFPZxqbz5WnR6LpIwdV3G4koMFzofQx ev5ED+zQ==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::19c2] by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kG6KS-0001V9-Aq; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:04:28 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos) To: Alim Akhtar , 'Stephen Rothwell' , 'Linux Next Mailing List' Cc: 'Linux Kernel Mailing List' , 'linux-scsi' , 'Santosh Yaraganavi' , 'Vinayak Holikatti' , 'Seungwon Jeon' References: <20200720194225.17de9962@canb.auug.org.au> <06a601d65f86$3d8aeee0$b8a0cca0$@samsung.com> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:04:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06a601d65f86$3d8aeee0$b8a0cca0$@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/21/20 10:41 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Randy, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Randy Dunlap >> Sent: 20 July 2020 22:11 >> To: Stephen Rothwell ; Linux Next Mailing List > next@vger.kernel.org> >> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List ; linux-scsi > scsi@vger.kernel.org>; Santosh Yaraganavi ; >> Vinayak Holikatti ; Alim Akhtar >> ; Seungwon Jeon >> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos) >> >> On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200717: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PHY_SAMSUNG_UFS >> Depends on [n]: OF [=n] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> Selected by [y]: >> - SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS [=y] && SCSI_LOWLEVEL [=y] && SCSI [=y] && >> SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM [=y] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> > Thanks, will post a patch shortly. Hi Alim, I am still seeing this in linux-next of 20200909. Was there a patch posted that I missed and is not applied anywhere yet? >> There are no build errors since provides stubs for functions when >> CONFIG_OF is not enabled. >> >> But new warnings are not OK. >> >> thanks. >> -- >> ~Randy >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap > thanks. -- ~Randy