improve msg_control kernel vs user pointer handling

improve msg_control kernel vs user pointer handling

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Dave,

this series replace the msg_control in the kernel msghdr structure
with an anonymous union and separate fields for kernel vs user
pointers.  In addition to helping a bit with type safety and reducing
sparse warnings, this also allows to remove the set_fs() in
kernel_recvmsg, helping with an eventual entire removal of set_fs().

[PATCH 1/3] net: add a CMSG_USER_DATA macro

[Christoph Hellwig]

Add a variant of CMSG_DATA that operates on user pointer to avoid
sparse warnings about casting to/from user pointers.  Also fix up
CMSG_DATA to rely on the gcc extension that allows void pointer
arithmetics to cut down on the amount of casts.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/linux/socket.h | 5 ++++-
 net/core/scm.c         | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
index 54338fac45cb7..4cc64d611cf49 100644
--- a/include/linux/socket.h
+++ b/include/linux/socket.h
@@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ struct cmsghdr {
 
 #define CMSG_ALIGN(len) ( ((len)+sizeof(long)-1) & ~(sizeof(long)-1) )
 
-#define CMSG_DATA(cmsg)	((void *)((char *)(cmsg) + sizeof(struct cmsghdr)))
+#define CMSG_DATA(cmsg) \
+	((void *)(cmsg) + sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
+#define CMSG_USER_DATA(cmsg) \
+	((void __user *)(cmsg) + sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
 #define CMSG_SPACE(len) (sizeof(struct cmsghdr) + CMSG_ALIGN(len))
 #define CMSG_LEN(len) (sizeof(struct cmsghdr) + (len))
 
diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index dc6fed1f221c4..abfdc85a64c1b 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int put_cmsg(struct msghdr * msg, int level, int type, int len, void *data)
 	err = -EFAULT;
 	if (copy_to_user(cm, &cmhdr, sizeof cmhdr))
 		goto out;
-	if (copy_to_user(CMSG_DATA(cm), data, cmlen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)))
+	if (copy_to_user(CMSG_USER_DATA(cm), data, cmlen - sizeof(*cm)))
 		goto out;
 	cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(len);
 	if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
 	if (fdnum < fdmax)
 		fdmax = fdnum;
 
-	for (i=0, cmfptr=(__force int __user *)CMSG_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
+	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
 	     i++, cmfptr++)
 	{
 		struct socket *sock;
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: add a CMSG_USER_DATA macro

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello!

On 11.05.2020 14:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Add a variant of CMSG_DATA that operates on user pointer to avoid
> sparse warnings about casting to/from user pointers.  Also fix up
> CMSG_DATA to rely on the gcc extension that allows void pointer
> arithmetics to cut down on the amount of casts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
[...]
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index dc6fed1f221c4..abfdc85a64c1b 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
[...]
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>   	if (fdnum < fdmax)
>   		fdmax = fdnum;
>   
> -	for (i=0, cmfptr=(__force int __user *)CMSG_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
> +	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;

    Perhaps it's time to add missing spaces consistently, not just one that 
you added?

>   	     i++, cmfptr++)
>   	{
>   		struct socket *sock;

MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: add a CMSG_USER_DATA macro

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:28:08AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>    Perhaps it's time to add missing spaces consistently, not just one that 
> you added?

That is all fixed up in the next patch.

[PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Christoph Hellwig]

Factor out two helpes to keep the code tidy.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 net/core/scm.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index abfdc85a64c1b..168b006a52ff9 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -277,78 +277,86 @@ void put_cmsg_scm_timestamping(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_timestamping_inter
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_cmsg_scm_timestamping);
 
+static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
+{
+	struct socket *sock;
+	int new_fd;
+	int error;
+
+	error = security_file_receive(file);
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
+	new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
+	if (new_fd < 0)
+		return new_fd;
+
+	error = put_user(new_fd, ufd);
+	if (error) {
+		put_unused_fd(new_fd);
+		return error;
+	}
+
+	/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
+	sock = sock_from_file(file, &error);
+	if (sock) {
+		sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
+		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
+	}
+	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
+	return error;
+}
+
+static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
+{
+	if (msg->msg_controllen <= sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
+		return 0;
+	return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
+}
+
 void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
 {
 	struct cmsghdr __user *cm
 		= (__force struct cmsghdr __user*)msg->msg_control;
-
-	int fdmax = 0;
-	int fdnum = scm->fp->count;
-	struct file **fp = scm->fp->fp;
-	int __user *cmfptr;
+	int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
+	int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
+	int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
 	int err = 0, i;
 
-	if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & msg->msg_flags) {
+	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
 		scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (msg->msg_controllen > sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
-		fdmax = ((msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
-			 / sizeof(int));
-
-	if (fdnum < fdmax)
-		fdmax = fdnum;
-
-	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
-	     i++, cmfptr++)
-	{
-		struct socket *sock;
-		int new_fd;
-		err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
+	for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
+		err = __scm_install_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
 		if (err)
 			break;
-		err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & msg->msg_flags
-					  ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
-		if (err < 0)
-			break;
-		new_fd = err;
-		err = put_user(new_fd, cmfptr);
-		if (err) {
-			put_unused_fd(new_fd);
-			break;
-		}
-		/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
-		sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
-		if (sock) {
-			sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
-			sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
-		}
-		fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
 	}
 
-	if (i > 0)
-	{
-		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i*sizeof(int));
+	if (i > 0)  {
+		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i * sizeof(int));
+
 		err = put_user(SOL_SOCKET, &cm->cmsg_level);
 		if (!err)
 			err = put_user(SCM_RIGHTS, &cm->cmsg_type);
 		if (!err)
 			err = put_user(cmlen, &cm->cmsg_len);
 		if (!err) {
-			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i*sizeof(int));
+			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
 			if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
 				cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
 			msg->msg_control += cmlen;
 			msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
 		}
 	}
-	if (i < fdnum || (fdnum && fdmax <= 0))
+
+	if (i < scm->fp->count || (scm->fp->count && fdmax <= 0))
 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
 
 	/*
-	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their
-	 * usage counts incremented, so we just free the list.
+	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their usage counts
+	 * incremented, so we just free the list.
 	 */
 	__scm_destroy(scm);
 }
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Ido Schimmel]

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Factor out two helpes to keep the code tidy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Christoph,

After installing net-next (fb9f2e92864f) on a Fedora 32 machine I cannot
ssh to it. Bisected it to this commit [1].

When trying to connect I see these error messages in journal:

sshd[1029]: error: mm_receive_fd: no message header
sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_pty_allocate: receive fds failed
sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_request_receive_expect: buffer error: incomplete message
sshd[1018]: fatal: mm_request_receive: read: Connection reset by peer

Please let me know if more info is required. I can easily test a patch
if you need me to try something.

Thanks

[1]
git bisect start
# bad: [fb9f2e92864f51d25e790947cca2ac4426a12f9c] net: dsa: tag_sja1105: appease sparse checks for ethertype accessors
git bisect bad fb9f2e92864f51d25e790947cca2ac4426a12f9c
# good: [3242956bd610af40e884b530b6c6f76f5bf85f3b] Merge branch 'net-dsa-Constify-two-tagger-ops'
git bisect good 3242956bd610af40e884b530b6c6f76f5bf85f3b
# bad: [1b0cde4091877cd7fe4b29f67645cc391b86c9ca] sfc: siena_check_caps() can be static
git bisect bad 1b0cde4091877cd7fe4b29f67645cc391b86c9ca
# bad: [cba155d591aa28689332bc568632d2f868690be1] ionic: add support for more xcvr types
git bisect bad cba155d591aa28689332bc568632d2f868690be1
# bad: [97cf0ef9305bba857f04b914fd59e83813f1eae2] Merge branch 'improve-msg_control-kernel-vs-user-pointer-handling'
git bisect bad 97cf0ef9305bba857f04b914fd59e83813f1eae2
# bad: [2618d530dd8b7ac0fdcb83f4c95b88f7b0d37ce6] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds
git bisect bad 2618d530dd8b7ac0fdcb83f4c95b88f7b0d37ce6
# good: [0462b6bdb6445b887b8896f28be92e0d94c92e7b] net: add a CMSG_USER_DATA macro
git bisect good 0462b6bdb6445b887b8896f28be92e0d94c92e7b
# first bad commit: [2618d530dd8b7ac0fdcb83f4c95b88f7b0d37ce6] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

> ---
>  net/core/scm.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index abfdc85a64c1b..168b006a52ff9 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
> @@ -277,78 +277,86 @@ void put_cmsg_scm_timestamping(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_timestamping_inter
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_cmsg_scm_timestamping);
>  
> +static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
> +{
> +	struct socket *sock;
> +	int new_fd;
> +	int error;
> +
> +	error = security_file_receive(file);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
> +	if (new_fd < 0)
> +		return new_fd;
> +
> +	error = put_user(new_fd, ufd);
> +	if (error) {
> +		put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> +		return error;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> +	sock = sock_from_file(file, &error);
> +	if (sock) {
> +		sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> +		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> +	}
> +	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
> +	return error;
> +}
> +
> +static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
> +{
> +	if (msg->msg_controllen <= sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> +		return 0;
> +	return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
> +}
> +
>  void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>  {
>  	struct cmsghdr __user *cm
>  		= (__force struct cmsghdr __user*)msg->msg_control;
> -
> -	int fdmax = 0;
> -	int fdnum = scm->fp->count;
> -	struct file **fp = scm->fp->fp;
> -	int __user *cmfptr;
> +	int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
> +	int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
> +	int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
>  	int err = 0, i;
>  
> -	if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & msg->msg_flags) {
> +	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
>  		scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (msg->msg_controllen > sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> -		fdmax = ((msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> -			 / sizeof(int));
> -
> -	if (fdnum < fdmax)
> -		fdmax = fdnum;
> -
> -	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
> -	     i++, cmfptr++)
> -	{
> -		struct socket *sock;
> -		int new_fd;
> -		err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
> +	for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
> +		err = __scm_install_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
>  		if (err)
>  			break;
> -		err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & msg->msg_flags
> -					  ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
> -		if (err < 0)
> -			break;
> -		new_fd = err;
> -		err = put_user(new_fd, cmfptr);
> -		if (err) {
> -			put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> -		sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
> -		if (sock) {
> -			sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> -			sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> -		}
> -		fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
>  	}
>  
> -	if (i > 0)
> -	{
> -		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i*sizeof(int));
> +	if (i > 0)  {
> +		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i * sizeof(int));
> +
>  		err = put_user(SOL_SOCKET, &cm->cmsg_level);
>  		if (!err)
>  			err = put_user(SCM_RIGHTS, &cm->cmsg_type);
>  		if (!err)
>  			err = put_user(cmlen, &cm->cmsg_len);
>  		if (!err) {
> -			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i*sizeof(int));
> +			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
>  			if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
>  				cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
>  			msg->msg_control += cmlen;
>  			msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	if (i < fdnum || (fdnum && fdmax <= 0))
> +
> +	if (i < scm->fp->count || (scm->fp->count && fdmax <= 0))
>  		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their
> -	 * usage counts incremented, so we just free the list.
> +	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their usage counts
> +	 * incremented, so we just free the list.
>  	 */
>  	__scm_destroy(scm);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:29:18PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Factor out two helpes to keep the code tidy.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Christoph,
> 
> After installing net-next (fb9f2e92864f) on a Fedora 32 machine I cannot
> ssh to it. Bisected it to this commit [1].
> 
> When trying to connect I see these error messages in journal:
> 
> sshd[1029]: error: mm_receive_fd: no message header
> sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_pty_allocate: receive fds failed
> sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_request_receive_expect: buffer error: incomplete message
> sshd[1018]: fatal: mm_request_receive: read: Connection reset by peer
> 
> Please let me know if more info is required. I can easily test a patch
> if you need me to try something.

To start we can try reverting just this commit, which requires a
little manual work.  Patch below:

---
From fe4f53219b42aeded3c1464dbe2bbc9365f6a853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:48:33 +0200
Subject: Revert "net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds"

This reverts commit 2618d530dd8b7ac0fdcb83f4c95b88f7b0d37ce6.
---
 net/core/scm.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index a75cd637a71ff..2d9aa5682bed2 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -280,53 +280,18 @@ void put_cmsg_scm_timestamping(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_timestamping_inter
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_cmsg_scm_timestamping);
 
-static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
-{
-	struct socket *sock;
-	int new_fd;
-	int error;
-
-	error = security_file_receive(file);
-	if (error)
-		return error;
-
-	new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
-	if (new_fd < 0)
-		return new_fd;
-
-	error = put_user(new_fd, ufd);
-	if (error) {
-		put_unused_fd(new_fd);
-		return error;
-	}
-
-	/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
-	sock = sock_from_file(file, &error);
-	if (sock) {
-		sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
-		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
-	}
-	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
-	return error;
-}
-
-static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
-{
-	if (msg->msg_controllen <= sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
-		return 0;
-	return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
-}
-
 void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
 {
 	struct cmsghdr __user *cm
 		= (__force struct cmsghdr __user*)msg->msg_control;
-	int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
-	int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
-	int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
+
+	int fdmax = 0;
+	int fdnum = scm->fp->count;
+	struct file **fp = scm->fp->fp;
+	int __user *cmfptr;
 	int err = 0, i;
 
-	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
+	if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & msg->msg_flags) {
 		scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -335,35 +300,62 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!msg->msg_control_is_user))
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
-		err = __scm_install_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
+	if (msg->msg_controllen > sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
+		fdmax = ((msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
+			 / sizeof(int));
+
+	if (fdnum < fdmax)
+		fdmax = fdnum;
+
+	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
+	     i++, cmfptr++)
+	{
+		struct socket *sock;
+		int new_fd;
+		err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
 		if (err)
 			break;
+		err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & msg->msg_flags
+					  ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
+		if (err < 0)
+			break;
+		new_fd = err;
+		err = put_user(new_fd, cmfptr);
+		if (err) {
+			put_unused_fd(new_fd);
+			break;
+		}
+		/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
+		sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
+		if (sock) {
+			sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
+			sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
+		}
+		fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
 	}
 
-	if (i > 0)  {
-		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i * sizeof(int));
-
+	if (i > 0)
+	{
+		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i*sizeof(int));
 		err = put_user(SOL_SOCKET, &cm->cmsg_level);
 		if (!err)
 			err = put_user(SCM_RIGHTS, &cm->cmsg_type);
 		if (!err)
 			err = put_user(cmlen, &cm->cmsg_len);
 		if (!err) {
-			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
+			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i*sizeof(int));
 			if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
 				cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
 			msg->msg_control += cmlen;
 			msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
 		}
 	}
-
-	if (i < scm->fp->count || (scm->fp->count && fdmax <= 0))
+	if (i < fdnum || (fdnum && fdmax <= 0))
 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
 
 	/*
-	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their usage counts
-	 * incremented, so we just free the list.
+	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their
+	 * usage counts incremented, so we just free the list.
 	 */
 	__scm_destroy(scm);
 }
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Ido Schimmel]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:49:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:29:18PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Factor out two helpes to keep the code tidy.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > 
> > Christoph,
> > 
> > After installing net-next (fb9f2e92864f) on a Fedora 32 machine I cannot
> > ssh to it. Bisected it to this commit [1].
> > 
> > When trying to connect I see these error messages in journal:
> > 
> > sshd[1029]: error: mm_receive_fd: no message header
> > sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_pty_allocate: receive fds failed
> > sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_request_receive_expect: buffer error: incomplete message
> > sshd[1018]: fatal: mm_request_receive: read: Connection reset by peer
> > 
> > Please let me know if more info is required. I can easily test a patch
> > if you need me to try something.
> 
> To start we can try reverting just this commit, which requires a
> little manual work.  Patch below:

Thanks for the quick reply. With the below patch ssh is working again.

> 
> ---
> From fe4f53219b42aeded3c1464dbe2bbc9365f6a853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:48:33 +0200
> Subject: Revert "net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds"
> 
> This reverts commit 2618d530dd8b7ac0fdcb83f4c95b88f7b0d37ce6.
> ---
>  net/core/scm.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index a75cd637a71ff..2d9aa5682bed2 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
> @@ -280,53 +280,18 @@ void put_cmsg_scm_timestamping(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_timestamping_inter
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_cmsg_scm_timestamping);
>  
> -static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
> -{
> -	struct socket *sock;
> -	int new_fd;
> -	int error;
> -
> -	error = security_file_receive(file);
> -	if (error)
> -		return error;
> -
> -	new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
> -	if (new_fd < 0)
> -		return new_fd;
> -
> -	error = put_user(new_fd, ufd);
> -	if (error) {
> -		put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> -		return error;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> -	sock = sock_from_file(file, &error);
> -	if (sock) {
> -		sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> -		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> -	}
> -	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
> -	return error;
> -}
> -
> -static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)
> -{
> -	if (msg->msg_controllen <= sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> -		return 0;
> -	return (msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) / sizeof(int);
> -}
> -
>  void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>  {
>  	struct cmsghdr __user *cm
>  		= (__force struct cmsghdr __user*)msg->msg_control;
> -	int o_flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0;
> -	int fdmax = min_t(int, scm_max_fds(msg), scm->fp->count);
> -	int __user *cmsg_data = CMSG_USER_DATA(cm);
> +
> +	int fdmax = 0;
> +	int fdnum = scm->fp->count;
> +	struct file **fp = scm->fp->fp;
> +	int __user *cmfptr;
>  	int err = 0, i;
>  
> -	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT) {
> +	if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & msg->msg_flags) {
>  		scm_detach_fds_compat(msg, scm);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -335,35 +300,62 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!msg->msg_control_is_user))
>  		return;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
> -		err = __scm_install_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
> +	if (msg->msg_controllen > sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> +		fdmax = ((msg->msg_controllen - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))
> +			 / sizeof(int));
> +
> +	if (fdnum < fdmax)
> +		fdmax = fdnum;
> +
> +	for (i=0, cmfptr =(int __user *)CMSG_USER_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
> +	     i++, cmfptr++)
> +	{
> +		struct socket *sock;
> +		int new_fd;
> +		err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
>  		if (err)
>  			break;
> +		err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & msg->msg_flags
> +					  ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			break;
> +		new_fd = err;
> +		err = put_user(new_fd, cmfptr);
> +		if (err) {
> +			put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		/* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> +		sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
> +		if (sock) {
> +			sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> +			sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> +		}
> +		fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
>  	}
>  
> -	if (i > 0)  {
> -		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i * sizeof(int));
> -
> +	if (i > 0)
> +	{
> +		int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(i*sizeof(int));
>  		err = put_user(SOL_SOCKET, &cm->cmsg_level);
>  		if (!err)
>  			err = put_user(SCM_RIGHTS, &cm->cmsg_type);
>  		if (!err)
>  			err = put_user(cmlen, &cm->cmsg_len);
>  		if (!err) {
> -			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i * sizeof(int));
> +			cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(i*sizeof(int));
>  			if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
>  				cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
>  			msg->msg_control += cmlen;
>  			msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
>  		}
>  	}
> -
> -	if (i < scm->fp->count || (scm->fp->count && fdmax <= 0))
> +	if (i < fdnum || (fdnum && fdmax <= 0))
>  		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their usage counts
> -	 * incremented, so we just free the list.
> +	 * All of the files that fit in the message have had their
> +	 * usage counts incremented, so we just free the list.
>  	 */
>  	__scm_destroy(scm);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:58:11PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:49:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:29:18PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Factor out two helpes to keep the code tidy.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > 
> > > Christoph,
> > > 
> > > After installing net-next (fb9f2e92864f) on a Fedora 32 machine I cannot
> > > ssh to it. Bisected it to this commit [1].
> > > 
> > > When trying to connect I see these error messages in journal:
> > > 
> > > sshd[1029]: error: mm_receive_fd: no message header
> > > sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_pty_allocate: receive fds failed
> > > sshd[1029]: fatal: mm_request_receive_expect: buffer error: incomplete message
> > > sshd[1018]: fatal: mm_request_receive: read: Connection reset by peer
> > > 
> > > Please let me know if more info is required. I can easily test a patch
> > > if you need me to try something.
> > 
> > To start we can try reverting just this commit, which requires a
> > little manual work.  Patch below:
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply. With the below patch ssh is working again.

Ok.  I'll see what went wrong for real and will hopefully have a
different patch for you in a bit.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:10:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Ok.  I'll see what went wrong for real and will hopefully have a
> different patch for you in a bit.

Can you try this patch instead of the previous one?

diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index a75cd637a71ff..875df1c2989db 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
 		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
 	}
 	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
-	return error;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds

[Ido Schimmel]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:17:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:10:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Ok.  I'll see what went wrong for real and will hopefully have a
> > different patch for you in a bit.
> 
> Can you try this patch instead of the previous one?

Works. Thanks a lot!

> 
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index a75cd637a71ff..875df1c2989db 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int __scm_install_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, int o_flags)
>  		sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
>  	}
>  	fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
> -	return error;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int scm_max_fds(struct msghdr *msg)

[PATCH 3/3] net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for ->msg_control

[Christoph Hellwig]

The msg_control field in struct msghdr can either contain a user
pointer when used with the recvmsg system call, or a kernel pointer
when used with sendmsg.  To complicate things further kernel_recvmsg
can stuff a kernel pointer in and then use set_fs to make the uaccess
helpers accept it.

Replace it with a union of a kernel pointer msg_control field, and
a user pointer msg_control_user one, and allow kernel_recvmsg operate
on a proper kernel pointer using a bitfield to override the normal
choice of a user pointer for recvmsg.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/linux/socket.h | 12 ++++++++++-
 net/compat.c           |  5 +++--
 net/core/scm.c         | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c |  3 ++-
 net/socket.c           | 22 ++++++-------------
 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
index 4cc64d611cf49..04d2bc97f497d 100644
--- a/include/linux/socket.h
+++ b/include/linux/socket.h
@@ -50,7 +50,17 @@ struct msghdr {
 	void		*msg_name;	/* ptr to socket address structure */
 	int		msg_namelen;	/* size of socket address structure */
 	struct iov_iter	msg_iter;	/* data */
-	void		*msg_control;	/* ancillary data */
+
+	/*
+	 * Ancillary data. msg_control_user is the user buffer used for the
+	 * recv* side when msg_control_is_user is set, msg_control is the kernel
+	 * buffer used for all other cases.
+	 */
+	union {
+		void		*msg_control;
+		void __user	*msg_control_user;
+	};
+	bool		msg_control_is_user : 1;
 	__kernel_size_t	msg_controllen;	/* ancillary data buffer length */
 	unsigned int	msg_flags;	/* flags on received message */
 	struct kiocb	*msg_iocb;	/* ptr to iocb for async requests */
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
index 4bed96e84d9a6..69fc6d1e4e6e9 100644
--- a/net/compat.c
+++ b/net/compat.c
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ int __get_compat_msghdr(struct msghdr *kmsg,
 	if (kmsg->msg_namelen > sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage))
 		kmsg->msg_namelen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage);
 
-	kmsg->msg_control = compat_ptr(msg.msg_control);
+	kmsg->msg_control_is_user = true;
+	kmsg->msg_control_user = compat_ptr(msg.msg_control);
 	kmsg->msg_controllen = msg.msg_controllen;
 
 	if (save_addr)
@@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ int get_compat_msghdr(struct msghdr *kmsg,
 	((ucmlen) >= sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr) && \
 	 (ucmlen) <= (unsigned long) \
 	 ((mhdr)->msg_controllen - \
-	  ((char *)(ucmsg) - (char *)(mhdr)->msg_control)))
+	  ((char __user *)(ucmsg) - (char __user *)(mhdr)->msg_control_user)))
 
 static inline struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cmsg_compat_nxthdr(struct msghdr *msg,
 		struct compat_cmsghdr __user *cmsg, int cmsg_len)
diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index 168b006a52ff9..a75cd637a71ff 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -212,16 +212,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__scm_send);
 
 int put_cmsg(struct msghdr * msg, int level, int type, int len, void *data)
 {
-	struct cmsghdr __user *cm
-		= (__force struct cmsghdr __user *)msg->msg_control;
-	struct cmsghdr cmhdr;
 	int cmlen = CMSG_LEN(len);
-	int err;
 
-	if (MSG_CMSG_COMPAT & msg->msg_flags)
+	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CMSG_COMPAT)
 		return put_cmsg_compat(msg, level, type, len, data);
 
-	if (cm==NULL || msg->msg_controllen < sizeof(*cm)) {
+	if (!msg->msg_control || msg->msg_controllen < sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) {
 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
 		return 0; /* XXX: return error? check spec. */
 	}
@@ -229,23 +225,30 @@ int put_cmsg(struct msghdr * msg, int level, int type, int len, void *data)
 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
 		cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
 	}
-	cmhdr.cmsg_level = level;
-	cmhdr.cmsg_type = type;
-	cmhdr.cmsg_len = cmlen;
-
-	err = -EFAULT;
-	if (copy_to_user(cm, &cmhdr, sizeof cmhdr))
-		goto out;
-	if (copy_to_user(CMSG_USER_DATA(cm), data, cmlen - sizeof(*cm)))
-		goto out;
-	cmlen = CMSG_SPACE(len);
-	if (msg->msg_controllen < cmlen)
-		cmlen = msg->msg_controllen;
+
+	if (msg->msg_control_is_user) {
+		struct cmsghdr __user *cm = msg->msg_control_user;
+		struct cmsghdr cmhdr;
+
+		cmhdr.cmsg_level = level;
+		cmhdr.cmsg_type = type;
+		cmhdr.cmsg_len = cmlen;
+		if (copy_to_user(cm, &cmhdr, sizeof cmhdr) ||
+		    copy_to_user(CMSG_USER_DATA(cm), data, cmlen - sizeof(*cm)))
+			return -EFAULT;
+	} else {
+		struct cmsghdr *cm = msg->msg_control;
+
+		cm->cmsg_level = level;
+		cm->cmsg_type = type;
+		cm->cmsg_len = cmlen;
+		memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cm), data, cmlen - sizeof(*cm));
+	}
+
+	cmlen = min(CMSG_SPACE(len), msg->msg_controllen);
 	msg->msg_control += cmlen;
 	msg->msg_controllen -= cmlen;
-	err = 0;
-out:
-	return err;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_cmsg);
 
@@ -328,6 +331,10 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/* no use for FD passing from kernel space callers */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!msg->msg_control_is_user))
+		return;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < fdmax; i++) {
 		err = __scm_install_fd(scm->fp->fp[i], cmsg_data + i, o_flags);
 		if (err)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index aa3fd61818c47..8206047d70b6b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -1492,7 +1492,8 @@ static int do_ip_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM)
 			return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 
-		msg.msg_control = (__force void *) optval;
+		msg.msg_control_is_user = true;
+		msg.msg_control_user = optval;
 		msg.msg_controllen = len;
 		msg.msg_flags = flags;
 
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 2dd739fba866e..1c9a7260a41de 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -924,14 +924,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_recvmsg);
 int kernel_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		   struct kvec *vec, size_t num, size_t size, int flags)
 {
-	mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
-	int result;
-
+	msg->msg_control_is_user = false;
 	iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, READ, vec, num, size);
-	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
-	result = sock_recvmsg(sock, msg, flags);
-	set_fs(oldfs);
-	return result;
+	return sock_recvmsg(sock, msg, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_recvmsg);
 
@@ -2239,7 +2234,8 @@ int __copy_msghdr_from_user(struct msghdr *kmsg,
 	if (copy_from_user(&msg, umsg, sizeof(*umsg)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	kmsg->msg_control = (void __force *)msg.msg_control;
+	kmsg->msg_control_is_user = true;
+	kmsg->msg_control_user = msg.msg_control;
 	kmsg->msg_controllen = msg.msg_controllen;
 	kmsg->msg_flags = msg.msg_flags;
 
@@ -2331,16 +2327,10 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
 				goto out;
 		}
 		err = -EFAULT;
-		/*
-		 * Careful! Before this, msg_sys->msg_control contains a user pointer.
-		 * Afterwards, it will be a kernel pointer. Thus the compiler-assisted
-		 * checking falls down on this.
-		 */
-		if (copy_from_user(ctl_buf,
-				   (void __user __force *)msg_sys->msg_control,
-				   ctl_len))
+		if (copy_from_user(ctl_buf, msg_sys->msg_control_user, ctl_len))
 			goto out_freectl;
 		msg_sys->msg_control = ctl_buf;
+		msg_sys->msg_control_is_user = false;
 	}
 	msg_sys->msg_flags = flags;
 
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for ->msg_control

[Eric Dumazet]

On 5/11/20 4:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The msg_control field in struct msghdr can either contain a user
> pointer when used with the recvmsg system call, or a kernel pointer
> when used with sendmsg.  To complicate things further kernel_recvmsg
> can stuff a kernel pointer in and then use set_fs to make the uaccess
> helpers accept it.
> 
> Replace it with a union of a kernel pointer msg_control field, and
> a user pointer msg_control_user one, and allow kernel_recvmsg operate
> on a proper kernel pointer using a bitfield to override the normal
> choice of a user pointer for recvmsg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/socket.h | 12 ++++++++++-
>  net/compat.c           |  5 +++--
>  net/core/scm.c         | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c |  3 ++-
>  net/socket.c           | 22 ++++++-------------
>  5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
> index 4cc64d611cf49..04d2bc97f497d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/socket.h
> +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,17 @@ struct msghdr {
>  	void		*msg_name;	/* ptr to socket address structure */
>  	int		msg_namelen;	/* size of socket address structure */
>  	struct iov_iter	msg_iter;	/* data */
> -	void		*msg_control;	/* ancillary data */
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ancillary data. msg_control_user is the user buffer used for the
> +	 * recv* side when msg_control_is_user is set, msg_control is the kernel
> +	 * buffer used for all other cases.
> +	 */
> +	union {
> +		void		*msg_control;
> +		void __user	*msg_control_user;
> +	};
> +	bool		msg_control_is_user : 1;

Adding a field in this structure seems dangerous.

Some users of 'struct msghdr '  define their own struct on the stack,
and are unaware of this new mandatory field.

This bit contains garbage, crashes are likely to happen ?

Look at IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS for example.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for ->msg_control

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:41:57AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > +	 * recv* side when msg_control_is_user is set, msg_control is the kernel
> > +	 * buffer used for all other cases.
> > +	 */
> > +	union {
> > +		void		*msg_control;
> > +		void __user	*msg_control_user;
> > +	};
> > +	bool		msg_control_is_user : 1;
> 
> Adding a field in this structure seems dangerous.
> 
> Some users of 'struct msghdr '  define their own struct on the stack,
> and are unaware of this new mandatory field.
> 
> This bit contains garbage, crashes are likely to happen ?
> 
> Look at IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS for example.

I though of that, an that is why the field is structured as-is.  The idea
is that the field only matters if:

 (1) we are in the recvmsg and friends path, and
 (2) msg_control is non-zero

I went through the places that initialize msg_control to find any spot
that would need an annotation.  The IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS sockopt doesn't
need one as it is using the msghdr in sendmsg-like context.

That being said while I did the audit I'd appreciate another look from
people that know the networking code better than me of course.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for ->msg_control

[Eric Dumazet]

On 5/13/20 9:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:41:57AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> +	 * recv* side when msg_control_is_user is set, msg_control is the kernel
>>> +	 * buffer used for all other cases.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	union {
>>> +		void		*msg_control;
>>> +		void __user	*msg_control_user;
>>> +	};
>>> +	bool		msg_control_is_user : 1;
>>
>> Adding a field in this structure seems dangerous.
>>
>> Some users of 'struct msghdr '  define their own struct on the stack,
>> and are unaware of this new mandatory field.
>>
>> This bit contains garbage, crashes are likely to happen ?
>>
>> Look at IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS for example.
> 
> I though of that, an that is why the field is structured as-is.  The idea
> is that the field only matters if:
> 
>  (1) we are in the recvmsg and friends path, and
>  (2) msg_control is non-zero
> 
> I went through the places that initialize msg_control to find any spot
> that would need an annotation.  The IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS sockopt doesn't
> need one as it is using the msghdr in sendmsg-like context.
> 
> That being said while I did the audit I'd appreciate another look from
> people that know the networking code better than me of course.
> 

Please try the following syzbot repro, since it crashes after your patch.

// autogenerated by syzkaller (https://github.com/google/syzkaller)

#define _GNU_SOURCE

#include <endian.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>

uint64_t r[1] = {0xffffffffffffffff};

int main(void)
{
  syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x1ffff000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
  syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
  syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x21000000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
  intptr_t res = 0;

  // socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
  res = syscall(__NR_socket, 0xaul, 1ul, 0);
  if (res != -1)
    r[0] = res;

  *(uint32_t*)0x20000080 = 7;
  // setsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_2292HOPLIMIT, [7], 4) = 0
  syscall(__NR_setsockopt, r[0], 0x29, 8, 0x20000080ul, 4ul);

  *(uint32_t*)0x20000040 = 0x18ff8;
  // getsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_2292PKTOPTIONS, "\24\0\0\0\0\0\0\0)\0\0\0\10\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", [102392->24]) = 0
  syscall(__NR_getsockopt, r[0], 0x29, 6, 0x20004040ul, 0x20000040ul);

  return 0;
}

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: cleanly handle kernel vs user buffers for ->msg_control

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:18:36AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Please try the following syzbot repro, since it crashes after your patch.

Doesn't crash here, but I could totally see why it could depending
in the stack initialization.  Please try the patch below - these
msghdr intance were something I missed because they weren't using
any highlevel recvmsg interfaces.  I'll do another round of audits
to see if there is anything else.


diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
index 18d05403d3b52..a0e50cc57e545 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
@@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ static int do_ipv6_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		msg.msg_control = optval;
 		msg.msg_controllen = len;
 		msg.msg_flags = flags;
+		msg.msg_control_is_user = true;
 
 		lock_sock(sk);
 		skb = np->pktoptions;

Re: improve msg_control kernel vs user pointer handling

[David Miller]

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:59:10 +0200

> this series replace the msg_control in the kernel msghdr structure
> with an anonymous union and separate fields for kernel vs user
> pointers.  In addition to helping a bit with type safety and reducing
> sparse warnings, this also allows to remove the set_fs() in
> kernel_recvmsg, helping with an eventual entire removal of set_fs().

Looks good.  Things actually used to be a lot worse in the original
compat code but Al Viro cleaned it up into the state it is in right
now.

Series applied to net-next, thanks!