From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2B9C432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7110207FD for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eWGt2oNT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728613AbfKYPjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:39:05 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:25392 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728525AbfKYPjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:39:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1574696343; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dneEZm6PaWRTyfChWz3XoPps5h37w7jv4igTylbUPX0=; b=eWGt2oNT4vGAOSIthrtnNifYzMnwNn6hTBCVWXLnyPNyNR9M07JAtmMqOJq4Z3kucXFFYT 7rwecUoCZkRZbLA/RgTPykYhpg4p1kk445QdXyFjBjyFHJWUB42fKdY5Wem6ba2vPGOdnj V5MyGtIER8EN+tfbJyArQnOzgYC0giU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-377-820Ckze9PraQlY4AioAdBA-1; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:39:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1AC1010B29; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D23F60C81; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:38:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Pravin Shelar Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , "David S . Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko , ovs dev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: support asymmetric conntrack References: <20191108210714.12426-1-aconole@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:38:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Aaron Conole's message of "Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:39:20 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: 820Ckze9PraQlY4AioAdBA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Aaron Conole writes: > Pravin Shelar writes: > >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Aaron Conole wrote: >>> >>> The openvswitch module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure >>> exposed via netfilter. It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and >>> DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision. Netfilter can support >>> this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and >>> again after egress. The openvswitch module doesn't have such capabilit= y. >>> >>> Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to >>> keep the symmetry. >>> >>> Fixes: 05752523e565 ("openvswitch: Interface with NAT.") >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole >> >> The patch looks ok. But I am not able apply it. can you fix the encoding= . > > Hrrm. I didn't make any special changes (just used git send-email). I > will look at spinning a second patch. Pravin, I tried the following: 10:36:59 aconole@dhcp-25 {(312434617cb1...)} ~/git/linux$ curl http://pat= chwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1192219/mbox/ > test.patch % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time C= urrent Dload Upload Total Spent Left S= peed 100 4827 100 4827 0 0 8824 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- = 8808 10:37:21 aconole@dhcp-25 {(312434617cb1...)} ~/git/linux$ git am test.pat= ch Applying: openvswitch: support asymmetric conntrack 10:37:24 aconole@dhcp-25 {(f759cc2b7323...)} ~/git/linux$=20 Can you check your mailer settings? The patchwork mbox worked fine, and I was able to apply from my own mbox as well. -Aaron