From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paulb@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] act_ct: support asymmetric conntrack
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:21:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7to8x8yj6k.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114162949.GB3419@localhost.localdomain> (Marcelo Ricardo Leitner's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:29:49 -0300")
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:07:14PM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> The act_ct TC module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure
>> exposed via netfilter. It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and
>> DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision. Netfilter can support
>> this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and
>> again after egress. The act_ct action doesn't have such capability.
>>
>> Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to
>> keep the symmetry.
>>
>> Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> net/sched/act_ct.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> index fcc46025e790..f3232a00970f 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> bool commit)
>> {
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
>> + int err;
>> enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
>>
>> if (!(ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT))
>> @@ -359,7 +360,17 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> return NF_ACCEPT;
>> }
>>
>> - return ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>> + err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>> + if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
>> + ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
>> + if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
>> + maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
>> + else
>> + maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
>> +
>> + err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>> + }
>
> I keep thinking about this and I'm not entirely convinced that this
> shouldn't be simpler. More like:
>
> if (DNAT)
> DNAT
> if (SNAT)
> SNAT
>
> So it always does DNAT before SNAT, similarly to what iptables would
> do on PRE/POSTROUTING chains.
I can rewrite the whole function, but I wanted to start with the smaller
fix that worked. I also think it needs more testing then (since it's
something of a rewrite of the function).
I guess it's not too important - do you think it gives any readability
to do it this way? If so, I can respin the patch changing it like you
describe.
>> + return err;
>> #else
>> return NF_ACCEPT;
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 21:07 [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: support asymmetric conntrack Aaron Conole
2019-11-08 21:07 ` [PATCH net 2/2] act_ct: " Aaron Conole
2019-11-14 14:22 ` Roi Dayan
2019-11-14 14:24 ` Paul Blakey
2019-11-18 21:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-14 16:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2019-11-18 21:21 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-11-18 22:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2019-11-22 20:39 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-22 20:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2019-11-09 22:15 ` [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: " Pravin Shelar
2019-11-18 20:39 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-25 15:38 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-26 4:07 ` Pravin Shelar
2019-11-12 8:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2019-11-18 21:19 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-28 8:22 ` Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7to8x8yj6k.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulb@mellanox.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).