From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752387AbcL3Q5E (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:57:04 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59389 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280AbcL3Q5C (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:57:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/54] bcache: comment on direct access to bvec table To: Ming Lei References: <1482854250-13481-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <1482854250-13481-8-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Kent Overstreet , Shaohua Li , Guoqing Jiang , Zheng Liu , Mike Christie , Jiri Kosina , Eric Wheeler , Yijing Wang , Al Viro , "open list:BCACHE (BLOCK LAYER CACHE)" , "open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT" From: Coly Li Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:56:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1482854250-13481-8-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016/12/27 下午11:55, Ming Lei wrote: > Looks all are safe after multipage bvec is supported. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > --- > drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + > drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 6 ++++++ > drivers/md/bcache/util.c | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c > index a43eedd5804d..fc35cfb4d0f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c > @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static void do_btree_node_write(struct btree *b) > > continue_at(cl, btree_node_write_done, NULL); > } else { > + /* No harm for multipage bvec since the new is just allocated */ > b->bio->bi_vcnt = 0; > bch_bio_map(b->bio, i); > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > index 3a19cbc8b230..607b022259dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static void write_bdev_super_endio(struct bio *bio) > > static void __write_super(struct cache_sb *sb, struct bio *bio) > { > + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */ > struct cache_sb *out = page_address(bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page); > unsigned i; > > @@ -1156,6 +1157,8 @@ static void register_bdev(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page, > dc->bdev->bd_holder = dc; > > bio_init(&dc->sb_bio, dc->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs, 1); > + > + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */ > dc->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = sb_page; > get_page(sb_page); > > @@ -1799,6 +1802,7 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj) > for (i = 0; i < RESERVE_NR; i++) > free_fifo(&ca->free[i]); > > + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */ > if (ca->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs[0].bv_page) > put_page(ca->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page); > > @@ -1854,6 +1858,8 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page, > ca->bdev->bd_holder = ca; > > bio_init(&ca->sb_bio, ca->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs, 1); > + > + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */ > ca->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = sb_page; > get_page(sb_page); > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c > index dde6172f3f10..5cc0b49a65fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c > @@ -222,6 +222,13 @@ uint64_t bch_next_delay(struct bch_ratelimit *d, uint64_t done) > : 0; > } > > +/* > + * Generally it isn't good to access .bi_io_vec and .bi_vcnt > + * directly, the preferred way is bio_add_page, but in > + * this case, bch_bio_map() supposes that the bvec table > + * is empty, so it is safe to access .bi_vcnt & .bi_io_vec > + * in this way even after multipage bvec is supported. > + */ > void bch_bio_map(struct bio *bio, void *base) > { > size_t size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size; > Acked-by: Coly Li